Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30172
The Organizational Innovativeness of Public Listed Housing Developers in Malaysia

Authors: Nor'Aini Yusof, Ismael Younis Abu-Jarad

Abstract:

This paper investigated the organizational innovativeness of public listed housing developers in Malaysia. We conceptualized organizational innovativeness as a multi-dimensional construct consisting of 5 dimensions: market innovativeness, product innovativeness, process innovativeness, behavior innovativeness and strategic innovativeness. We carried out questionnaire survey with all accessible public listed developers in Malaysia and received a 56 percent response. We found that the innovativeness of public listed housing developers is low. The paper ends by providing some explanations for the results.

Keywords: innovativeness, housing industry, measurement of innovativeness, public listed housing developers

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1328438

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1052

References:


[1] Naim, M. and J. Barlow, An innovative supply chain strategy for customized housing. Construction Management & Economics, 2003. 21: p. 593-610.
[2] Naim, M.M. and J. Gosling, On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010. In Press, Corrected Proof.
[3] Pan, W., A.G.F. Gibb, and A.R.J. Dainty, Leading UK housebuilders' utilization of offsite construction methods. Building Research & Information, 2008. 36(1): p. 56-67.
[4] Arif, M. and C. Egbu, Making a case for offsite construction in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2010. 17(6): p. 536-548.
[5] Barlow, J. and R. Ozaki, Achieving ÔÇÿcustomer focus- in private house building: current practice and lessons from other industries. Housing Studies, 2003. 18: p. 87-101.
[6] Barlow, J., et al., Choice and delivery in housebuilding: lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders. Building Research & Information, 2003. 31(2): p. 134 - 145.
[7] Malaysian Government, Tenth Malaysia Plan 2011-2015 2010: Kuala Lumpur.
[8] Dulaimi, M.F., Y.Y. Ling, and A. Bajracharya, Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. . Building Research and Information, 2002. 30(4): p. 237 - 247.
[9] Fitzgerald, E. and A. Wankerl (2011) Why government needs to invest in innovation.
[10] Reichstein, T., A.J. Salter, and D.M. Gann, Break on Through: Sources and Determinants of Product and Process Innovation among UK Construction Firms. Industry & Innovation, 2008. 15(6): p. 601-625.
[11] Egan, J., Rethinking construction: report of the construction task force on the scope for improving the quality and efficiency of UK construction. 1998, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: London.
[12] Das, S.R. and M.P. Joshi, Process innovativeness in technology services organizations: Roles of differentiation strategy, operational autonomy and risk-taking propensity. Journal of Operations Management, 2007. 25(3): p. 643-660.
[13] Jun, K.-N. and C. Weare, Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2010. 9(June).
[14] Holmen Entreprise Ltd, Innovation in the Housing Industry. 2002, National Research Council of Canada.
[15] Rangarajan, D., et al., Organizational variables, sales force perceptions of readiness for change, learning, and performance among boundaryspanning teams: A conceptual framework and propositions for research. Industrial Marketing Management, 2004. 33(4): p. 289-305.
[16] Domínguez, L. and F. Brown, Measuring technological capabilities in Mexican industry. Cepal Review, 2004. 83(August): p. 129-144.
[17] Laursen, K. and A. Salter, Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2006. 27(2): p. 131-150.
[18] Miller, T.L. and C.L. Wesley, Assessing mission and resources for social change: An organizational identity perspective on social venture capitalists' decision criteria. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 2010. 34(4): p. 705-733.
[19] Barlow, J. and M. Koberle-Gaiser, Delivering innovation in hospital construction. California Management Review, 2008. 51(2).
[20] Drejer, I. and A.L. Vinding, Organisation ÔÇÿanchoring- of knowledge, and innovative activity in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 2006. 24(9): p. 921-931.
[21] Yusof, N.A., M.W.M. Shafiei, and I. Said. Dimensions of Housing Developers' Readiness for Innovation: The Case of the Build-Then-Sell System in Malaysia. . in Proceeding of 2010 International Conference on Innovation, Management and Service (ICIMS 2010). 2010. Singapore.
[22] Wang, C.L. and P.K. Ahmed, The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2004. 7(4): p. 303-313.
[23] Avlonitis, G.J. and H.E. Salavou, Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 2007. 60(5): p. 566-575.
[24] Avlonitis, G.J., A. Kouremenos, and N. Tzokas, Assessing the Innovativeness of Organizations and its Antecedents: Project Innovstrat. European Journal of Marketing, 1994. 28(11): p. 5-28.
[25] Lumpkin, G.T. and G.G. Dess, Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 1996. 21(1): p. 135-172.
[26] Danneels, E. and E.J. Kleinschmidt, Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2001. 18(6): p. 357-373.
[27] Sandvik, I.L. and K. Sandvik, The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and business performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2003. 20(4): p. 355-376.
[28] Lam, P.T.I., F.K.W. Wong, and F.W.H. Wong, Building features and site-specific factors affecting buildability in Hong Kong. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 2007. 5(2): p. 129-147.
[29] Johne, A., Successful Market Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1999. 2(1): p. 6-11.
[30] Baer, M. and M. Frese, Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2003. 24(1): p. 45-68.
[31] Soutar, G.N. and S. Ward, Looking at behavioral innovativeness: a Rasch analysis. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 2008(October).
[32] Besanko, D., D. Dranove, and M. Shanley, The Economics of Strategy. 1996, New York, NY.: John Wiley & Sons.
[33] Johnstone, M., Conventional housing provision in Peninsular Malaysia: spatial distortions in a developing economy. Habitat International, 1980. 5(3/4): p. 337-359.
[34] Krejcie, R.V. and D.W. Morgan, Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970. 30: p. 607-610.
[35] Covin, J.G. and D.P. Slevin, Entrepreneur versus conservative firms: a comparison of strategies and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 1991. 28(5): p. 439-462.
[36] Hurley, R.F., G.T.M. Hult, and G.A. Knight, Innovativeness and capacity to innovate in a complexity of firm-level relationships: A response to Woodside (2004). Industrial Marketing Management, 2005. 34(3): p. 281-283.
[37] Hair, J.F., et al., Multivariate Data Analysis. 6 ed. 2006, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education Inc.