Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Electrical Resistivity of Subsurface: Field and Laboratory Assessment

Authors: Zulfadhli Hasan Adli, Mohd Hafiz Musa, M. N. Khairul Arifin

Abstract:

The objective of this paper is to study the electrical resistivity complexity between field and laboratory measurement, in order to improve the effectiveness of data interpretation for geophysical ground resistivity survey. The geological outcrop in Penang, Malaysia with an obvious layering contact was chosen as the study site. Two dimensional geoelectrical resistivity imaging were used in this study to maps the resistivity distribution of subsurface, whereas few subsurface sample were obtained for laboratory advance. In this study, resistivity of samples in original conditions is measured in laboratory by using time domain low-voltage technique, particularly for granite core sample and soil resistivity measuring set for soil sample. The experimentation results from both schemes are studied, analyzed, calibrated and verified, including basis and correlation, degree of tolerance and characteristics of substance. Consequently, the significant different between both schemes is explained comprehensively within this paper.

Keywords: Electrical Resistivity, Granite, Soil.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1061633

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 4517

References:


[1] Michael van Schoor, "Detection of sinkholes using 2D electrical resistivity imaging," Journal of Applied Geophysics 50 (2002),pp. 393- 399.
[2] Ettore Cardarelli, Michele Cercato, Antonio Cerreto and Gerardina Di Filippo, "Electrical resistivity and seismic refraction tomography to detect buried Cavities," Geophysical Prospecting, 2009, pp. 1-11
[3] I. B. Osazuwa and E. Chii Chii, "Two-dimensional electrical resistivity survey around the periphery of an artificial lake in the Precambrian basement complex of northern Nigeria," Journal of Physical Sciences Vol. 5(3), pp. 238-245, March 2010
[4] T. Dahlin," The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques," Computer & Geosciences 27 (2001), pp. 1019 - 1029.
[5] Vincenzo Compare, Marilena Cozzolino, "Resistivity probability tomography imaging at the Castle of Zena, Italy," EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, Volume 2009.
[6] F.Nguyen, S. Garambois, "Image processing of 2D resistivity data for imaging faults," Journal of Applied Geophysics 57 (2005), pp.260 - 277.
[7] P.H. Giao, S.G. Chung, " Electric imaging and laboratory resistivity testing for geotechnical investigation of Pusan clay deposits," Journal of Applied Geophysics 52 (2003), pp. 157 - 175.
[8] F.S. Grant, G.F. West, " Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics," Mcgraw-Hill Book Company (1965), pp. 393.
[9] Dr. M.H.Loke, Tutorial, " 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys"(2004), pp. 13.
[10] J.H. Schon, "Physical Properties of Rocks,Fundamentals And Principles of Petrophysics, Handbook of Geophysical Exploration" (1996), pp. 401.
[11] E.I.Parkhomenko, "Electrical Properties of Rocks," Plenum Press, (1967), pp. 121.
[12] Pazdîrek O. & Bláha V, "Examples of resistivity imaging using ME- 100 resistivity field acquisition system." 58th EAGE conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Extended Abstracts, P050(1996).
[13] M.H loke, Ian Acworth, T. dahlin, "A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys," Exploration geophysics (2003) 34, pp. 182 - 187