Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32451
Empirical Analysis of Velocity Behavior for Collaborative Robots in Transient Contact Cases

Authors: C. Schneider, M. M. Seizmeir, T. Suchanek, M. Hutter-Mironovová, M. Bdiwi, M. Putz


In this paper, a suitable measurement setup is presented to conduct force and pressure measurements for transient contact cases at the example of lathe machine tending. Empirical measurements were executed on a selected collaborative robot’s behavior regarding allowable operating speeds under consideration of sensor- and workpiece-specific factors. Comparisons between the theoretic calculations proposed in ISO/TS 15066 and the practical measurement results reveal a basis for future research. With the created database, preliminary risk assessment and economic assessment procedures of collaborative machine tending cells can be facilitated.

Keywords: biomechanical thresholds, collaborative robots, force and pressure measurements, machine tending, transient contact

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 364


[1] P. Chemweno, L. Pintelon, and W. Decre, “Orienting safety assurance with outcomes of hazard analysis and risk assessment: A review of the ISO 15066 standard for collaborative robot systems,” Safety Science, vol. 129, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104832.
[2] P. A. Lasota, T. Fong, and J. A. Shah, “A Survey of Methods for Safe Human-Robot Interaction,” Foundations and Trends, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 261–349, 2014, doi: 10.1561/9781680832792.
[3] J. Marvel and R. Bostelman, “A Cross-domain Survey of Metrics for Modelling and Evaluating Collisions,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 11, 2014, doi: 10.5772/58846.
[4] S. Robla-Gómez, V. M. Becerra, J. R. Llata, E. González-Sarabia, C. Torre-Ferrero, and J. Pérez-Oria, “Working Together: A Review on Safe Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Environments,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 26754–26773, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2773127.
[5] V. Villani, F. Pini, F. Leali, and C. Secchi, “Survey on human–robot collaboration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications,” Mechatronics, vol. 55, pp. 248–266, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.02.009.
[6] Robots and robotic devices - Collaborative robots, ISO/TS 15066:2016, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2016.
[7] R. Behrens and G. Pliske, “Human-Robot Collaboration: Partial Supplementary Examination (of Pain Thresholds) for Their Suitability for Inclusion in Publications of the DGUV and Standardization,” Fraunhofer IFF, Otto von Guericke University Trauma Surgery Clinic, 2019.
[8] K. Eder, C. Harper, and Z. Leonards, Eds., Towards the Safety of Human-in-the-Loop Robotics: Challenges and Opportunities for Safety Assurance of Robotic Co-Workers: IEEE, 2014.
[9] P. Svarny, J. Rozlivek, L. Rustler, and M. Hoffmann, “3D Collision-Force-Map for Safe Human-Robot Collaboration (Preprint),” 2020.
[10] S. Haddadin, A. Albu-Schäffer, and G. Hirzinger, “Safe Physical Human-Robot Interaction: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights,” Robotics Research, pp. 395–407, 2011, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14743-2_33.
[11] B. Vemula, B. Matthias, and A. Ahmad, “A design metric for safety assessment of industrial robot design suitable for power‑ and force‑limited collaborative operation,” International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, vol. 2, pp. 226–234, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s41315-018-0055-9.
[12] R. Weitschat, “Industrial Human-Robot Collaboration: Maximizing Performance While Maintaining Safety,” Dissertation, Fakultät für Maschinenbau und Schiffstechnik, Universität Rostock, 2019.
[13] S. Haddadin, A. De Luca, and A. Albu-Schäffer, “Robot Collisions: A Survey on Detection, Isolation, and Identification,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1292–1312, 2017, doi: 10.1109/TRO.2017.2723903.
[14] M. Ganglbauer, M. Ikeda, M. Plasch, and A. Pichler, “Human in the loop online estimation of robotic speed limits for safe human robot collaboration,” 30th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing (FAIM2021), Procedia Manufacturing 51, pp. 88–94, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.014.
[15] N. Kovincic et al., “A model-based strategy for safety assessment of a robot arm interacting with humans,” Proceedings in Applied Mathematics & Mechanics, 2019, doi: 10.1002/pamm.201900247.
[16] H. Shin, S. Kim, K. Seo, and S. Rhim, Eds., A Real-Time Human-Robot Collision Safety Evaluation Method for Collaborative Robot: IEEE, 2019.
[17] S.-H. Yen, P.-C. Tang, Y.C. Lin, and C.-Y. Lin, “Development of a Virtual Force Sensor for a Low-Cost Collaborative Robot and Applications to Safety Control,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 11, 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19112603.
[18] C. Schneider, T. Suchanek, M. Klos, and M. Hutter-Mironovová, COVR Project RACOS: Risk Assessment Metamodel for Cobot Operating Speed Determination. (Online). Available: (accessed: Aug. 14 2021).
[19] DGUV, Collaborative robot systems: Design of systems with "Power and Force Limiting" function. (Online) Available: (accessed: Apr. 12 2019).