Pension Plan Member’s Investment Strategies with Transaction Cost and Couple Risky Assets Modelled by the O-U Process
Authors: Udeme O. Ini, Edikan E. Akpanibah
Abstract:
This paper studies the optimal investment strategies for a plan member (PM) in a defined contribution (DC) pension scheme with transaction cost, taxes on invested funds and couple risky assets (stocks) under the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (O-U) process. The PM’s portfolio is assumed to consist of a risk-free asset and two risky assets where the two risky assets are driven by the O-U process. The Legendre transformation and dual theory is use to transform the resultant optimal control problem which is a nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE) into linear PDE and the resultant linear PDE is then solved for the explicit solutions of the optimal investment strategies for PM exhibiting constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) using change of variable technique. Furthermore, theoretical analysis is used to study the influences of some sensitive parameters on the optimal investment strategies with observations that the optimal investment strategies for the two risky assets increase with increase in the dividend and decreases with increase in tax on the invested funds, risk averse coefficient, initial fund size and the transaction cost.
Keywords: Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, portfolio management, Legendre transforms, CARA utility.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 487References:
[1] J. Xiao, Z. Hong, C. Qin. (2007). The constant elasticity of variance (CEV) model and the Legendre transform-dual solution for annuity contracts, Insurance, 40(2), 302–310.
[2] J. Gao (2009). Optimal portfolios for DC pension plan under a CEV model. Insurance Mathematics and Economics 44(3): 479-490.
[3] B. O. Osu, K. N. C. Njoku, B. I. Oruh. (2020). On the Investment Strategy, Effect of Inflation and Impact of Hedging on Pension Wealth during Accumulation and Distribution Phases. Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 2(3), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2020.62
[4] D. Li, X. Rong, H. Zhao, (2013). Optimal investment problem with taxes, dividends and transaction costs under the constant elasticity of variance model. Transaction on Mathematics, 12(3), 243-255.
[5] M. Gu, Y. Yang, S. Li, J. Zhang, (2010). Constant elasticity of variance model for proportional reinsurance and investment strategies, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics. 46(3), 580-587
[6] D. Li, X. Rong, H. Zhao, B. Yi. Equilibrium investment strategy for DC pension plan with default risk and return of premiums clauses under CEV model, Insurance 72(2017), 6-20.
[7] B. O.Osu, E. E. Akpanibah, C. Olunkwa (2018). Mean-Variance Optimization of portfolios with return of premium clauses in a DC pension plan with multiple contributors under constant elasticity of variance model, Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., 12, 85–90.
[8] J. F. Boulier, S. Huang, G. Taillard G. Optimal management under stochastic interest rates: the case of a protected defined contribution pension fund, Insurance 28(2) (2001), 173–189.
[9] G. Deelstra, M. Grasselli and. P. F. Koehl (2003). Optimal investment strategies in the presence of a minimum guarantee. Insurance, 33(1): 189–207.
[10] J. Gao (2008) “Stochastic optimal control of DC pension funds, Insurance, vol. 42(3), 1159–1164.
[11] P. Battocchio, F. Menoncin. Optimal pension management in a stochastic framework, Insurance34(1) (2004) 79–95.
[12] A. J. G. Cairns, D. Blake, K. Dowd. Stochastic life styling: optimal dynamic asset allocation for defined contribution pension plans, Journal of Economic Dynamics &Control 30(5) (2006) 843–877.
[13] C. Zhang, X Rong. (2013). Optimal investment strategies for DC pension with a stochastic salary under affine interest rate model. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, vol 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/297875,
[14] E. E. Akpanibah, B. O. Osu, K.N. C. Njoku, E. O. Akak. (2017) Optimization of Wealth Investment Strategies for a DC Pension Fund with Stochastic Salary and Extra Contributions. International Journal of Partial Diff. Equations and Application, 5(1): 33-41.
[15] E. E. Akpanibah, U. O. Ini (2020). Portfolio Strategy for an Investor with Logarithm Utility and Stochastic Interest Rate under Constant Elasticity of Variance Model. Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 2(3), 186-196.
[16] S. A. Ihedioha, N. T. Danat, A. Buba. (2020). Investor’s Optimal Strategy with and Without Transaction Cost Under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Models via Exponential Utility Maximization. Pure and Applied MathematicsJournal,9(3): 55-63.
[17] X. Xiao, K, Yonggui Kao. (2020). The optimal investment strategy of a DC pension plan under deposit loan spread and the O-U process. Preprint submitted to Elsevier.
[18] Jose, Luis, Menaldi. (2006). Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions 25.
[19] H, Zhao, X, Rong. (2012). Portfolio selection problem with multiple risky assets under the constant elasticity of variance model, Mathematics and Economics, 50, 179-190.
[20] M. Jonsson, R. Sircar (2002). Optimal investment problems and volatility homogenization approximations. in Modern Methods in Scientific Computing and Applications, 75(2): 255–281.