Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30121
Investigation of Different Stimulation Patterns to Reduce Muscle Fatigue during Functional Electrical Stimulation

Authors: R. Ruslee, H. Gollee

Abstract:

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a commonly used technique in rehabilitation and often associated with rapid muscle fatigue which becomes the limiting factor in its applications. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects on the onset of fatigue of conventional synchronous stimulation, as well as asynchronous stimulation that mimic voluntary muscle activation targeting different motor units which are activated sequentially or randomly via multiple pairs of stimulation electrodes. We investigate three different approaches with various electrode configurations, as well as different patterns of stimulation applied to the gastrocnemius muscle: Conventional Synchronous Stimulation (CSS), Asynchronous Sequential Stimulation (ASS) and Asynchronous Random Stimulation (ARS). Stimulation was applied repeatedly for 300 ms followed by 700 ms of no-stimulation with 40 Hz effective frequency for all protocols. Ten able-bodied volunteers (28±3 years old) participated in this study. As fatigue indicators, we focused on the analysis of Normalized Fatigue Index (NFI), Fatigue Time Interval (FTI) and pre-post Twitch-Tetanus Ratio (ΔTTR). The results demonstrated that ASS and ARS give higher NFI and longer FTI confirming less fatigue for asynchronous stimulation. In addition, ASS and ARS resulted in higher ΔTTR than conventional CSS. In this study, we proposed a randomly distributed stimulation method for the application of FES and investigated its suitability for reducing muscle fatigue compared to previously applied methods. The results validated that asynchronous stimulation reduces fatigue, and indicates that random stimulation may improve fatigue resistance in some conditions.

Keywords: Asynchronous stimulation, electrode configuration, functional electrical stimulation, muscle fatigue, pattern stimulation, random stimulation, sequential stimulation, synchronous stimulation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1125377

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 886

References:


[1] N. R. Glaviano, W. T. Langston, J. M. Hart, and S. Saliba, “Influence of patterned electrical neuromuscular stimulation on quadriceps activation in individuals with knee joint injury.,” Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 915–23, Dec. 2014.
[2] G. M. Graham, T. A. Thrasher, and M. R. Popovic, “The effect of random modulation of functional electrical stimulation parameters on muscle fatigue,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 38–45, 2006.
[3] A. Thrasher, G. M. Graham, and M. R. Popovic, “Reducing muscle fatigue due to functional electrical stimulation using random modulation of stimulation parameters,” in Artificial Organs, 2005, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 453–458.
[4] T. Kesar, L. Chou, and S. A. Binder-Macleod, “Effects of stimulation frequency versus pulse duration modulation on muscle fatigue,” J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 662–671, Aug. 2008.
[5] E. M. Schereen, G. N. Nogueira-Neto, E. Krueger-beck, V. L. S. N. Button, and P. Nohama, “Investigation of muscle behavior during different functional electrical stimulation profiles using mechanomyography,” in 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2010, pp. 3970–3973.
[6] D. G. Sayenko, R. Nguyen, T. Hirabayashi, M. R. Popovic, and K. Masani, “Method to reduce muscle fatigue during transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in major knee and ankle muscle groups.,” Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, Dec. 2014.
[7] N. M. Malesevic, L. Z. Popovic, L. Schwirtlich, and D. B. Popovic, “Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation,” Muscle and Nerve, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 556–562, 2010.
[8] R. J. Downey, M. J. Bellman, H. Kawai, C. M. Gregory, and W. E. Dixon, “Comparing the induced muscle fatigue between asynchronous and synchronous electrical stimulation in able-bodied and spinal cord injured populations,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 964–972, 2015.
[9] L. Z. P. Maneski, N. M. Malešević, A. M. Savić, T. Keller, and D. B. Popović, “Surface-distributed low-frequency ssynchronous stimulation delays fatigue of stimulated muscles,” Muscle and Nerve, no. December, 2013.
[10] N. M. Malesevic, L. Z. Popovic Maneski, V. Ilic, N. Jorgovanovic, G. Bijelic, T. Keller, and D. B. Popovic, “A multi-pad electrode based functional electrical stimulation system for restoration of grasp,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 66, 2012.
[11] L. Z. Popovic and N. M. Malesevic, “Muscle fatigue of quadriceps in paraplegics: comparison between single vs. multi-pad electrode surface stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Engineering the Future of Biomedicine, EMBC 2009, 2009, pp. 6785–6788.
[12] B. Dreibati, C. Lavet, A. Pinti, and G. Poumarat, “Influence of electrical stimulation frequency on skeletal muscle force and fatigue,” Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 266–277, 2010.
[13] D. G. Sayenko, R. Nguyen, M. R. Popovic, and K. Masani, “Reducing muscle fatigue during transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation by spatially and sequentially distributing electrical stimulation sources,” Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 793–804, 2014.