Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30172
Damage Evaluation of Curved Steel Bridges Upgraded with Isolation Bearings and Unseating Prevention Cable Restrainers

Authors: Carlos Mendez Galindo, Toshiro Hayashikawa, Javier Gil Belda

Abstract:

This paper investigates the effectiveness of the use of seismic isolation devices on the overall 3D seismic response of curved highway viaducts with an emphasis on expansion joints. Furthermore, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of cable restrainers is presented. For this purpose, the bridge seismic performance has been evaluated on four different radii of curvature, considering two cases: restrained and unrestrained curved viaducts. Depending on the radius of curvature, three-dimensional non-linear dynamic analysis shows the vulnerability of curved viaducts to pounding and deck unseating damage. In this study, the efficiency of using LRB supports combined with cable restrainers on curved viaducts is demonstrated, not only by reducing in all cases the possible damage, but also by providing a similar behavior in the viaducts despite of curvature radius.

Keywords: Nonlinear dynamic response, seismic design, seismic isolation, unseating prevention system.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1059655

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1420

References:


[1] Japan Road Association (JRA), Specifications for Highway Bridges - Part V Seismic Design, Maruzen, Tokyo, 2002.
[2] Robinson, W. H., "Lead-rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes", Earthquake Engineering Structures, Vol. 10, pp. 593-604, 1982.
[3] Maleki, S., "Effect of deck and support stiffness on seismic response of slab-girder bridges", Engineering Structures, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 219- 226, 2002.
[4] Mendez Galindo C., Hayashikawa T., Ruiz Julian F.D., "Effects of curvature radius on nonlinear seismic response of curved highway viaducts equipped with unseating prevention cable restrainers", Journal of Constructional Steel, JSSC, Vol. 14, pp. 91-98, 2006.
[5] DesRoches, R., Pfeifer, T., Leon, R. T., and Lam, T., "Full-scale tests of seismic cable restrainer retrofits for simply supported bridges", Journal of Bridge Engineering ASCE, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 191-198, 2003.
[6] Saiidi, M., Maragakis, E.A., and Feng, S., "An evaluation of the current Caltrans seismic restrainer design method", Rep. No. CCEER-92-8, Civil Engineering Department, University of Nevada, Reno, 1992.
[7] Saiidi, M., Maragakis, E., and Feng, S., "Parameters in bridge restrainer design for seismic retrofit", Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 1, pp. 61-68, 1996.
[8] Fenves, G., and DesRoches, R., "Response of the Northwest Connector in the Landers and Big Bear earthquakes", Rep. No. UCB/EERC-94/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1994.
[9] Yang, Y. S., Priestley, M.J. N., and Ricles, J. M., "Longitudinal seismic response of bridge frames connected by restrainers", Rep. No. SSRP- 94/09, Structural System Research, University of California, San Diego, 1994.
[10] Trochalakis, P., Eberhard, M.O., and Stanton, J. F., "Evaluation and design of seismic restrainers for in-span hinges", Rep. No. WA-RD 387.1, Washington State Transportation Center, Seattle, 1995.
[11] Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, M., "Seismic design and retrofit of bridges", Wiley, New York, 1996.
[12] Yashinsky, M., "Chapter 30: Earthquake damage to structures". In: Chen, W. F., editor. Structural Engineering Handbook, Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1999.
[13] Duan, L., and Chen, W. F., "Chapter 18: Bridges". In: Chen, W. F., and Scawthorn, C., editors. Earthquake Engineering Handbook, Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1999.
[14] Takeno, S., Ohno, H., and Izuno, K., "Velocity-based design of seismic unseating prevention cable and shock absorber for bridges", Structural Engineering and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 175-188, 2004.
[15] Ali HM, Abdel-Ghaffar AM. "Modeling the nonlinear seismic behavior of cable-stayed bridges with passive control bearings". Computer & Structures, Vol. 54, No.3, pp. 461-92, 1995.
[16] Somerville P.G., "Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 137, pp. 201- 12, 2003.
[17] Zhu P., Abe M., Fujino Y., "Evaluation of pounding countermeasures and serviceability of elevated bridges during seismic excitation using 3D modeling". Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol.33, No.5, pp.591-609, 2004.
[18] Mendez Galindo C., Hayashikawa T., Ruiz Julian F.D., "Pounding and deck unseating damage of curved highway viaducts with piers of unequal heights", Journal of Constructional Steel, JSSC, Vol. 15, pp. 285-292, 2007.
[19] Kawashima, K., and Shoji, G., "Effect of restrainers to mitigate pounding between adjacent decks subjected to a strong ground motion", 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1435, 2000.