Optimal Control Strategy for High Performance EV Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

Authors: Mehdi Karbalaye Zadeh, Ehsan M. Siavashi

Abstract:

The controllable electrical loss which consists of the copper loss and iron loss can be minimized by the optimal control of the armature current vector. The control algorithm of current vector minimizing the electrical loss is proposed and the optimal current vector can be decided according to the operating speed and the load conditions. The proposed control algorithm is applied to the experimental PM motor drive system and this paper presents a modern approach of speed control for permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) applied for Electric Vehicle using a nonlinear control. The regulation algorithms are based on the feedback linearization technique. The direct component of the current is controlled to be zero which insures the maximum torque operation. The near unity power factor operation is also achieved. More over, among EV-s motor electric propulsion features, the energy efficiency is a basic characteristic that is influenced by vehicle dynamics and system architecture. For this reason, the EV dynamics are taken into account.

Keywords: PMSM, Electric Vehicle, Optimal control, Traction.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1055329

References:

[1] John M. Miller, Propulsion systems for hybrid vehicles, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 2004.
[2] Mohammad S. Islam, S. Mir, T. Sebastian, and S. Underwood, "Design consideration of sinusoidally excited permanent magnet machines for low torque ripple applications," in Conf. Rec. IEEE-IAS Annu. Meetings, 2004, CD-ROM.
[3] M. Sanada, K. Hiramoto, S. Morimoto, and Y. Takeda, "Torque ripple improvement for synchronous reluctance motor using an asymmetric flux barrier arrangement," IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1076-1082, July/August 2004.
[4] S. Morimoto, Y. Tong, Y. Takeda, and T. Hirasa, "Loss minimization control of permanent magnet synchronous motor drives," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 511-517, Oct. 1994.
[5] J. J. Lee, Y. K. Kim, H. Nam, K. H. Ha, J. P. Hong, and D. H. Hwang, "Loss distribution of three phase induction motor fed by pulsewidthmodulated inverter," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 762-765, Mar. 2004.
[6] S. Morimoto, Y. Takeda, and T. Hirasa, "Current phase control methods for permanent magnet synchronous motors," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 133-138, April 1990.
[7] S. Morimoto, and Y. Takeda, "Machine parameters and performance of interior permanent magnet synchronous motors with different permanent magnet volume," Elec. Eng. in Japan, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 1403-1408, 2000.
[8] Douglas C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
[9] Raymond H. Myers and Douglas C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Design Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
[10] J. T. Li, Z. J. Liu, M. A. Jabbar, and X. K. Gao, "Design optimization for cogging torque minimization using response surface methodology," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1176-1179, March 2004.