Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
A Heuristic Based Conceptual Framework for Product Innovation
Authors: Amalia Suzianti
Abstract:
This research elaborates decision models for product innovation in the early phases, focusing on one of the most widely implemented method in marketing research: conjoint analysis and the related conjoint-based models with special focus on heuristics programming techniques for the development of optimal product innovation. The concept, potential, requirements and limitations of conjoint analysis and its conjoint-based heuristics successors are analysed and the development of conceptual framework of Genetic Algorithm (GA) as one of the most widely implemented heuristic methods for developing product innovations are discussed.Keywords: Product Innovation, Conjoint Analysis, Heuristic Model, Genetic Algorithm
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1077175
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1612References:
[1] AARTS, E., KORST, J., VAN LAARHOVEN, P. ÔÇ×Simulated Annealing, in: Local Search in Combinatorial Optimisation", Aarts and Lenstra Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1997, pp. 91-120.
[2] ALBERS, S., GASSMANN, O. ÔÇ×Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement". in: Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement: Strategie - Umsetzung - Controlling, 2005, Vol. 1, p. 3-22.
[3] ALEXOUDA, G., PAPARRIZOS, K. "A Genetic Algorithm Approach to the Product Line Design Problem Using The Seller-s Return Criterion: An Extensive Comparative Computational Study", in 2001 European Journal of Operation Research, Vol.134 (1), pp.165-178.
[4] ALLEN, F., KARJALAINEN, R. ."Using Genetic Algorithms to Find Technical Trading Rules", in 1999 Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 51, pp. 245-271.
[5] ANDERSSON, J. " Multiobjective Optimization in Engineering Design, Linköping Studies" in 2001 Science and Technology, No.675.
[6] ATUAHENE-GIMA, K." An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance - A Contingency Approach", in 1995 Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.12 (4), pp. 275-293.
[7] ATUAHENE-GIMA, K. "Market Orientation and Innovation", in 1996Journal of Business Research, Vol.35 (1), pp.93-103.
[8] BALAKRISHNAN, P.V., JACOB, V.S. (1995). Triangulation in decision support systems: algorithms for product design, in Decision Support Systems, Vol.14, pp. 313-327.
[9] BALAKRISHNAN, P.V., JACOB, V.S. "Genetic Algorithms for Product Design", in 1996 Management Science, Vol. 42 (8), pp.1105- 1117.
[10] BALAKRISHNAN, P.V., GUPTA, R., JACOB, V.S. "Development of Hybrid Genetic Algorithms for Product Line Designs" , in 2004 IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 34 (1), pp.468-483.
[11] BALAKRISHNAN, P.V., GUPTA, R., JACOB, V.S. "An investigation of mating and population maintenance strategies in hybrid genetic heuristics for product line designs", in 2006 Computers and Operations Research, Vol.33, pp.639-659.
[12] BELLONI, A., FREUND, R.M., et al."Optimizing Product Line Design: Efficient Methods and Comparisons", Working Paper OR 373-05, MIT Operation Research Center, February 2005.
[13] BELLONI, A., FREUND, R.M., et al. ÔÇ×Optimizing Product Line Design: Efficient Methods and Comparisons", Working Paper OR 373-05, 2nd Revision, MIT Operation Research Center, December 2007.
[14] CALANTONE, R.J., GARCIA, R., DROGE, C. "The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning", in 2003 Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.20 (2), pp.90-103.
[15] COOPER, R. G., KLEINSCHMIDT, E. J. ÔÇ×Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors", in 1996 Research Technology Management, Vol.39 (4), pp.18-29.
[16] DAMANPOUR, F., GOPALAKRISHNAN, S. "The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations", in: 2001Journal of Management Studies, Vol.38 (1), pp.45-65.
[17] DODGSON, M. "The Management of Technological Innovation - An International and Strategic Approach", Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
[18] FILIPPINI, R., SALMASO, L., TESSAROLO, P. "Product Development Time Performance: Investigating the Effect of Interactions between Drivers", in 2001 Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.21 (3), pp.199-214.
[19] GARCIA, R. "Uses of Agent-based Modeling in Innovation / New Product Development Research", in: 2005 Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, pp. 380-398.
[20] GOLDBERG, D.E.. "Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning", Massachusetts, 1989.
[21] GOLDBERG, D.E. " The Design of Innovation: Lessons from Genetic Algorithms, Lessons for the Real World", in: 2000 Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.64, pp. 7-12.
[22] GOLDBERG, D.E. (2002). "The Design of Innovation: Lessons from and for Competent Genetic Algorithms", Massachusetts.
[23] GREEN, P.E., CARROLL, J.D., GOLDBERG, S.M. "A General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint Analysis", in: 1981, Journal of Marketing, Vol.45 (1), pp. 17-37.
[24] GREEN, P.E., KRIEGER, A.M. (1985). "Models and Heuristics for Product Line Selection", in: 1985 Marketing Science, Vol. 4 (1), pp. 1- 19.
[25] GREEN, P.E., KRIEGER, A.M. " A Consumer-based Approach to designing Product Line Extensions," in 1987Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.4, pp.21-32.
[26] GREEN, P.E., KRIEGER, A.M. ÔÇ×A Simple Heuristics for Selecting ÔÇÿgood- Products in Conjoint Analysis", in 1987 Application of Management Science, Vol.5, pp.131-153.
[27] GREEN, P.E., KRIEGER, A.M "Conjoint Analysis with Product- Positioning Applications", in: Handbooks in OR and MS, J. Eliashberg and G.L.Lilien (Eds), Elsevier Science B.V, 1993Vol. 5, pp. 467-515.
[28] GRUCA, T.S., KLEMZ, B.R. "Optimal New Product Positioning: A Genetic Algorithm Approach", in 2003 European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 146, pp.621-633.
[29] JIAO, J., ZHANG, Y., WANG, Y. ÔÇ× A Heuristic Genetic Algorithm for Product Portfolio Planning", in 2007 Computers & Operations Research, Vol.34, pp.1777-1799.
[30] LIN, S.-J., DR. WEI, C.-C. (2005). ÔÇ×Using Genetic Algorithm to Facilitate Time-Cost Optimization in Product Development". In 2005 Journal of American Academy of Business, Vol. 7, pp. 168-175.
[31] LOUVIERE, J., HENSHER, D., SWAIT, J. "Conjoint Preference Elicitation Methods in the Broader Context of Random Utility Theory Preference Elicitation Methods". In: GUSTAFSSON, A., HERRMANN, A., HUBER, F. (Hrsg), Conjoint Measurement - Methods and Applications, Berlin, 2000, pp. 279-318.
[32] LUCE, R.D, TUKEY, J.W. "Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement", in 1964 Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol.1, pp.1-27.
[33] MC.FADDEN, D. "Conditional Logit Analysis of qualitative choice behaviour," in Zarembka P., Frontier of Economics, Academic Press, New York, 1974 pp.105-142.
[34] MC.FADDEN, D. "The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research", in 1986 Marketing Science, Vol.5 (4), pp.275-297.
[35] METAXIOTIS, K., PSARRAS, J. "The contribution of neural networks and genetic algorithms to business decision support - Academic myth or practical solution", in 2004 Management Decision, Vol.42 (2), pp.229- 242.
[36] MITSUO, G., RUNWEI, C. "Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design", New York, 1997.
[37] MITSUO, G., RUNWEI, C. "Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Optimisation", New York, 2000.
[38] STEINER, W., HRUSCHKA, H. "Genetic Algorithms for product design: how well do they really work?" , in 2003 International Journal of Market Research, Vol.45, Quarter 2.
[39] ZUFRYDEN, F. S. "A Conjoint-Measurement-Based Approach for Optimal New Product Design and Market Segmentation", in Schocker, A.D.(ed.), Analytic Approaches to Product and Market Planning, Cambridge, MA, 1977 pp.100-114.
[40] ZUFRYDEN, F. S. "A Zero-One Integer Programming Model for Market Segmentation and Product Positioning", in1979Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.30 (1), pp.63-76.
[41] ZHOU, K.Z., YIM, C.K., TSE, D.K. "The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations", in 2005 Journal of Marketing, Vol.69 (2), pp.42-60.