Comparison and Characterization of Dyneema™ HB-210 and HB-212 for Accelerated UV Aging
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Comparison and Characterization of Dyneema™ HB-210 and HB-212 for Accelerated UV Aging

Authors: Jonmichael A. Weaver, David A. Miller

Abstract:

Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) presents several distinct advantages as a material with a high strength to weight ratio, durability, and neutron stability. Understanding the change in the mechanical performance of UHMWPE due to environmental exposure is key to safety for future applications. Dyneema® HB-210, a 15 µm diameter UHMWPE multi-filament fiber laid up in a polyurethane matrix in [0/ 90]2, with a thickness of 0.17 mm is compared to the same fiber and orientation system, HB-212, with a rubber-based matrix under UV aging conditions. UV aging tests according to ASTM-G154 were performed on both HB-210 and HB-212 to interrogate the change in mechanical properties, as measured through dynamic mechanical analysis and imaged using a scanning electron microscope. These results showed a decrease in both the storage modulus and loss modulus of the aged material compared to the unaged, even though the tan δ slightly increased. Material degradation occurred at a higher rate in Dyneema® HB-212 compared to HB-210. The HB-210 was characterized for the effects of 100 hours of UV aging via dynamic mechanical analysis. Scanning electron microscope images were taken of the HB-210 and HB-212 to identify the primary damage mechanisms in the matrix. Embrittlement and matrix spall were the products of prolonged UV exposure and erosion, resulting in decreased mechanical properties.

Keywords: Composite materials, material characterization, UV aging, UHMWPE.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 512

References:


[1] A. Fazal, “Polymer Fibre Composites: Investigation into Performance Enhancement Through Viscoelastically Generated Pre-Stress,” Thesis, no. May, 2014.
[2] L. Torrisi et al., “Radiation effects induced by MeV electron beams irradiating dense polyethylene (UHMWPE),” Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 259–271, 2004, doi: 10.1080/10420150410001711813.
[3] “Dyneema® Fiber.” https://www.dsm.com/dyneema/en_GB/our-products/dyneema-fiber.html (accessed Apr. 11, 2021).
[4] J. F. Rabek, Polymer Photodegradation: Mechanisms and Experimental Methods. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1994.
[5] E3-95, “Standard Practice for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens,” ASTM International, vol. 82, no. C, pp. 1–15, 2016, doi: 10.1520/D0638-14.1.
[6] “Radiation: Ultraviolet (UV) radiation.” https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/radiation-ultraviolet-(uv) (accessed Apr. 20, 2021).
[7] H. Zhang, M. Shi, J. Zhang, and S. Wang, “Effects of sunshine UV irradiation on the tensile properties and structure of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fiber,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 2757–2763, 2003, doi: 10.1002/app.12448.
[8] C. Rockett, “UV Degradation Effects in Materials – An Elementary Overview » UV Solutions,” Dec. 12, 2019. https://uvsolutionsmag.com/articles/2019/uv-degradation-effects-in-materials-an-elementary-overview/ (accessed Apr. 20, 2021).
[9] ASTM, “G154 Standard Practice for Operating Fluorescent Ultraviolet (UV) Lamp Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials 1,” Astm, pp. 1–12, 2014, doi: 10.1520/G0154-16.2.