Effect of Environmental Changes in Working Heart Rate among Industrial Workers: An Ergonomic Interpretation

Authors: P. Mukhopadhyay, N. C. Dey

Abstract:

Occupational health hazard is a very common term in every emerging country. Along with the unorganized sector, most organized sectors including government industries are suffering from this affliction. In addition to workload, the seasonal changes also have some impacts on working environment. With this focus in mind, one hundred male industrial workers, who are directly involved to the task of Periodic Overhauling (POH) in a fabricating workshop in the public domain are selected for this research work. They have been studied during work periods throughout different seasons in a year. For each and every season, the participants working heart rate (WHR) is measured and compared with the standards given by different national and internationally recognized agencies i.e., World Health Organization (WHO) and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) etc. The different environmental parameters i.e. dry bulb temperature (DBT), wet bulb temperature (WBT), globe temperature (GT), natural wet bulb temperature (NWB), relative humidity (RH), wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT), air velocity (AV), effective temperature (ET) are recorded throughout the seasons to critically observe the effect of seasonal changes on the WHR of the workers. The effect of changes in environment to the WHR of the workers is very much surprising. It is found that the percentages of workers who belong to the ‘very heavy’ workload category are 83.33%, 66.66% and 16.66% in the summer, rainy and winter seasons, respectively. Ongoing undertaking of this type of job profile forces the worker towards occupational disorders causing absenteeism. This occurrence results in lower production rates, and on the other hand, costs due to medical claims also weaken the industry’s economic condition. In this circumstance, the authors are trying to focus on some remedial measures from the ergonomic angle by proposing a new work/ rest regimen and introducing engineering controls along with management controls which may help the worker, and consequently, the management also.

Keywords: Environmental changes, industrial worker, working heart rate, workload, occupational health hazard.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2643579

References:

[1] Daniela Schoofs, Stephan Pabst, Matthias Brand and Oliver T. Wolfa, Working memory is differentially affected by stress in men and women, Behavioural Brain Research 241 (2013) 144– 153.
[2] Syed Saad Hussain Shah, Ahsan Raza Jaffari, Jabran Aziz, Wasiq Ejaz, Ihsan Ul-Haq, Syed Neiman Raza, Workload and Performance of Employees, Interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research in business, September 2011, Vol 3, no 5.
[3] Rajib Biswas, Amalendu Samanta, and Prasenjit Saha, Cardiac strain of confectionery worker in relation to heat exposure during regular work shift, Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Sep-Dec; 15(3): 120–126.
[4] Emma Lowe, Laura Pickup,Network Rail Signaler’s Workload Toolkit.
[5] M Canjuga, T Laubli, G F Bauer, Can the job demand control model explain back & neck pain? Cross- sectional study in a representative sample of Swiss working population, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 40(2010) 663-668.
[6] Kathi J. Lovelace, Charles C. Manz and José C. Alves, Work stress and leadership development: The role of self-leadership,shared leadership, physical fitness and flow in managing demandsand increasing job control, Human Resource Management Review 17 (2007) 374–387.
[7] Karolina Kazmierczak, Svend Erick Mathiassen, Patrick Neumann, Jorgen Winkel, Observer reliability of industrial activity analysis based on video recording, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36(2006) 275-282.
[8] Mika Kivimäki, Päivi Leino-Arjas, Ritva Luukkonen, Hilkka Riihimäi, Jussi Vahtera, Juhani Kirjonen, Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality: prospective cohort study of industrial employees, BMJ 2002; 325.
[9] R Wells, R Norman, P Neumann, D Andrews, J Frank, H Shannon, M Kerr, Assessment of physical work load in epidemiology studies: common measurement metrics for exposure assessment, Ergonomics, 1997, Vol: 40, No: 1, 51-61.
[10] David M Andrews, Robert W Norman, Richard P Wells, Patrick Neumann, The accuracy of self-report and trained observer methods for obtaining estimates of peak load information during industrial work, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19(1997) 445-455.
[11] Astrand, P.O.and Rodhal, K., Textbook of Work Physiology, McGraw-Hill Publication, New York; 1986.
[12] WHO, Health factors in working under conditions of heat stress, Geneva 412: WHO Tech. Rep. Series; 1969.
[13] ACGIH: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, 1992-93.
[14] TLVs, Threshold Limit Values for chemical substances and physical agents in the work room environment with intended changes (for 1981), Cincinnati, OH, USA; (ACGIH), 1981.
[15] Ayoub, M. M (1989). Technology and Engineering (google book). 21st ed. (ebook) CRC Press, pp.276-277. Available at: https://books.google.co.in>books.