The Effects of T-Walls on Urban Landscape and Quality of Life and Anti-Terror Design Concept in Kabul, Afghanistan
Authors: Fakhrullah Sarwari, Hiroko Ono
Abstract:
Kabul city has suffered a lot in 40 years of conflict of civil war and “The war on terror”. After the invasion of Afghanistan by the United States of America and its allies in 2001, the Taliban was removed from operational power, but The Taliban and other terrorist groups remained in remote areas of the country, they started suicide attacks and bombings. Hence to protect from these attacks officials surrounded their office buildings and houses with concrete blast walls. It gives a bad landscape to the city and creates traffic congestions. Our research contains; questionnaire, reviewing Kabul Municipality documents and literature review. Questionnaires were distributed to Kabul citizens to find out how people feel by seeing the T-Walls on Kabul streets? And what problems they face with T-Walls. “The T-Walls pull down commission” of Kabul Municipality documents were reviewed to find out what caused the failure of this commission. A literature review has been done to compare Kabul with Washington D.C on how they designed the city against terrorism threat without turning the cities into lock down. Bogota city of Columbia urban happiness movement is reviewed and compared with Kabul. The finding of research revealed that citizens of Kabul want security but not at the expense of public realm and creating the architecture of fear. It also indicates that increasing the T-walls do not give secure feeling but instead; it increases terror, hatred and affect people’s optimism. At the end, a series of recommendation is suggested on the issue.
Keywords: Anti-terror design, Kabul, T-Walls, urban happiness.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2580950
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 849References:
[1] Schneider, Richard. “American Anti-Terrorism Planning and design strategies”, University of Florida Journal Law & Public Policy. 15 (2003) 129- 154.
[2] Coaffee, J., Wood, D. (2006). Security is coming home, International relations, 20(4), 501-517.
[3] Art after 9/11- Roland Bleiker, 2006, Alternatives 31(1): 77-99
[4] Charles Montgomery (2013). Happy City: Transforming Our Lives Through Urban Design, 8-12
[5] Charles Montgomery (2009), The Archipelago of Fear: Are fortification and foreign aid making Kabul more dangerous? The Walrus.
[6] Charles Montgomery (2007), Bogota’s urban happiness movement, The Globe and Mail
[7] Jon Coaffee, Paul O’hare & Marian Hawkesworth “Security Dialogue vol. 40, nos 4–5”, August/October 2009, 498
[8] Benton- Short, L. (2007). Bollards, bunkers, and barriers: securing the national mall in Washington, D.C. Environmental and planning D-society & space, 25(3), 424-446
[9] The National Capital Urban design and Security Plan (NCPC), 2002
[10] “The T-walls pull down commission” documents from Kabul Municipality.