Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31515
Tool Damage and Adhesion Effects in Turning and Drilling of Hardened Steels

Authors: Chris M. Taylor, Ian Cook, Raul Alegre, Pedro Arrazola, Phil Spiers


Noteworthy results have been obtained in the turning and drilling of hardened high-strength steels using tungsten carbide based cutting tools. In a finish turning process, it was seen that surface roughness and tool flank wear followed very different trends against cutting time. The suggested explanation for this behaviour is that the profile cut into the workpiece surface is determined by the tool’s cutting edge profile. It is shown that the profile appearing on the cut surface changes rapidly over time, so the profile of the tool cutting edge should also be changing rapidly. Workpiece material adhered onto the cutting tool, which is also known as a built-up edge, is a phenomenon which could explain the observations made. In terms of tool damage modes, workpiece material adhesion is believed to have contributed to tool wear in examples provided from finish turning, thread turning and drilling. Additionally, evidence of tool fracture and tool abrasion were recorded.

Keywords: Turning, drilling, adhesion, wear, hard steels.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1054


[1] The A to Z of materials at, “Stainless steels- introduction to the grades and families”, accessed April 2016.
[2] J. Paro, H. Hanninen, V. Kauppinen, “Tool wear and machinability of X5 CrMnN 18 18 stainless steels,” Materials Processing Technology, vol. 119, pp. 14-20, 2001.
[3] I. Korkut, M. Kasap, I. Ciftci, U. Seker, “Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel”, Materials and Design, vol. 25, pp. 303-305, 2004.
[4] T. Ozel, Y. Karpat, L. Figueira, J.P. Davim, “Modelling of surface finish and tool flank wear in turning of AISI D2 steel with ceramic wiper inserts”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 189, pp. 192-198, 2007.
[5] D. Philip Selvaraj, P. Chandramohan, M. Moharanraj, “Optimization of surface roughness, cutting force and tool wear of nitrogen alloyed duplex stainless steel in a dry turning process using Taguchi method”, Measurement, vol. 49, pp. 205-215, 2014.
[6] S.R. Das, A. Kumar, D. Dhupal, “Effect of machining parameters on surface roughness in machining of hardened AISI 4340 steel using coated carbide inserts”, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 445-453, 2013.
[7] W. Chen, “Cutting forces and surface finish when machining medium hardness steel using CBN tools”, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 40, pp. 455-466, 2000.
[8] M. Hasegawa, M. Seireg, R. Lindberg, “Surface roughness model for turning”, Tribology International, vol. 9, pp. 285-289, 1976.
[9] W.B. Heginbotham, S.L. Gogia, “Metal cutting and the built-up nose”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 175, pp. 892–917, 1971.
[10] T.H.C. Childs, K. Sekiya, R. Tezuka, Y. Yamane, D. Dornfeld, D.-E. Lee, S. Min, P.K. Wright, “Surface finishes from turning and facing with round nosed tools”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, vol. 57, pp. 89-92, 2008.
[11] R. Pavel, I. Marinescu, M. Deis, J. Pillar, “Effect of tool wear on surface finish for a case of continuous and interrupted hard turning”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 170, iss. 1–2, pp. 341-349, 2005.
[12] Mitsubishi Materials, “Tool news: solid carbide drills”, 2011.6 update B095A, 2011.
[13] J. Nomani, A. Pramanik, T. Hilditch, G. Littlefair, “Machinability study of first generation duplex (2205), second generation duplex (2507) and austenite stainless steel during drilling process”, Wear, vol. 304, pp. 20-28, 2013.
[14] V.C. Venkatesh, W. Xue, “A study of the built-up edge in drilling with indexable coated carbide inserts”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 58, pp. 379-384, 1996.