The Differences in Normative Beliefs among Schoolchildren with Reactive, Proactive, Reactive-Proactive Aggression, and without Aggression

Authors: Annis Lai Chu Fung

Abstract:

This study is to fill up a research gap on examining the differences in normative beliefs (namely acceptance of weaknesses, acceptance of provoked aggression, and acceptance of unprovoked aggression) among different subtypes of aggressors and non-aggressors (reactive aggressors, proactive aggressors, reactive-proactive aggressors, and non-aggressors). 2,236 students (1,372 males and 864 females), aged from 11 to 18, completed a self-reported questionnaire. Results revealed that (a) schoolchildren with reactive-proactive aggression have the highest acceptance of provoked aggression, the highest acceptance of unprovoked aggression, and the lowest acceptance of weakness; (b) schoolchildren with proactive aggression have higher acceptance of unprovoked aggression and lower acceptance of weakness than reactive aggressors; and (c) schoolchildren without aggression have the lowest acceptance of provoked aggression, the lowest acceptance of unprovoked aggression, and the highest acceptance of weakness.

Keywords: Normative belief, schoolchildren, reactive, proactive, aggression.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100136

References:

[1] Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social information processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146-1158.
[2] Dodge, K. A., & Crick, N. R. (1990). Social information-processing bases of aggressive behavior in children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 8-22.
[3] Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: Evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12, 115-122.
[4] Bacchini, D., Esposito, G., & Affuso, G. (2009). Social experience and school bullying. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 17-32.
[5] Fite, P. J., Raine, A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. A. (2010). Reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent males. Examining differential outcomes 10 years later in early adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 141-157.
[6] Solberg, M. E., Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (2007). Bullies and victims at school: Are they the same pupils? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 441-464.
[7] Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanism in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993-1002.
[8] Roland, E., & Idsoe, T. (2001). Aggression and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 446-462.
[9] Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
[10] Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35, 1171-1190.
[11] Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2008). The cognitive basis of trait anger and reactive aggression: An integrative analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 36, 539-552.
[12] Andreou, E. (2001). Bully/victim problems and their association with coping behavior in conflictual peer interaction among school-age children. Educational Psychology, 21, 59-66.
[13] Arsenio, W. F., Adams, E., & Gold, J. (2009) Social information processing, moral reasoning and emotion attributions: Relations with adolescents' reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 80, 1739-1755.
[14] Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (1997). Bully victim problems and their association with Eysenck's personality dimensions in 8 to 13 year-olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 51-54.
[15] Chan, J. Y., Fung, A. L., & Gerstein, L. H. (2013). Correlates of pure and co-occurring proactive and reactive aggressors in Hong Kong. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 181-192.
[16] Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R. & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 2000.
[17] Werner, N. E., & Nixon, C. L. (2005). Normative beliefs and relational aggression: An investigation of the cognitive bases of adolescent aggressive behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 229-243.
[18] Huesmann, L. R. (1988). An information processing model for the development of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 13-24.
[19] Huesmann, L. R., & Guerra, N. G. (1997). Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408-419.
[20] Mcconville, D. W., & Cornell, D. G. (2003). Aggressive attitudes predict aggressive behavior in middle school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 179.
[21] Cornell, D. G., & Loper, A. B. (1998). Assessment of violence and other high-risk behaviors with a school survey. School Psychology Review, 27, 317-330.
[22] Gottheil, N. F., & Dubow, E. F. (2001). Tripartite beliefs models of bully and victim behavior. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 25-47.
[23] Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., et al. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159-171.
[24] Fung, A. L., Raine, A., & Gao, Y. (2009). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Reactive-Proactive aggression Questionnaire (RPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 473-479.
[25] Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
[26] Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
[27] Steiger, J. H. (1998). A note on multiple sample extensions of the RMESA fit index. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 411-419.
[28] Bentler, P.M., and Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
[29] Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445-455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.