Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31198
Groundwater Seepage Estimation into Amirkabir Tunnel Using Analytical Methods and DEM and SGR Method

Authors: Hadi Farhadian, Homayoon Katibeh

Abstract:

In this paper, groundwater seepage into Amirkabir tunnel has been estimated using analytical and numerical methods for 14 different sections of the tunnel. Site Groundwater Rating (SGR) method also has been performed for qualitative and quantitative classification of the tunnel sections. The obtained results of above mentioned methods were compared together. The study shows reasonable accordance with results of the all methods unless for two sections of tunnel. In these two sections there are some significant discrepancies between numerical and analytical results mainly originated from model geometry and high overburden. SGR and the analytical and numerical calculations, confirm high concentration of seepage inflow in fault zones. Maximum seepage flow into tunnel has been estimated 0.425 lit/sec/m using analytical method and 0.628 lit/sec/m using numerical method occured in crashed zone. Based on SGR method, six sections of 14 sections in Amirkabir tunnel axis are found to be in "No Risk" class that is supported by the analytical and numerical seepage value of less than 0.04 lit/sec/m.

Keywords: DEM, water Seepage, Amirkabir Tunnel, SGR, Analytical Method

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099876

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3572

References:


[1] Goodman, RE, Moye, DG, Schalkwyk, AV, Javandel, I, (1965) Groundwater inflows during tunnel driving. Bull. Ass. Eng. Geologists 2, pp. 35–56.
[2] Freeze RA, Cherry JA, (1979) Groundwater: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
[3] Heuer RE (1995) Estimating rock-tunnel water inflow. In Proceeding of the Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. Ed. G. E. Williamson and I. M. Growring; pp. 41-60.
[4] Lei S (1999) An analytical solution for steady flow into a tunnel. Ground Water 37, pp. 23–26.
[5] El Tani M (1999) Water inflow into tunnels. Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress ITA- ITES 1999, Oslo, pp. 61–70, Balkema.
[6] Karlsrud K (2001) Water control when tunneling under urban areas in the Olso region. NFF publication, 2001. 12(4): pp. 27-33
[7] Lombardi G (2002) Private communication.
[8] El Tani M (2003) Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 18 (1), pp. 49-55.
[9] Farhadian H, Aalianvari A, Katibeh H, (2012) Optimization of Analytical Equations of Groundwater Seepage into Tunnels: A Case Study of Amirkabir Tunnel. J. Geo. Soc. India 80, pp. 96-100.
[10] Katibeh H, Aalianvari A (2009) Development of a new method for tunnel site rating from groundwater hazard point of view. J. App. Sci. 9, pp. 1496-1502.
[11] Jing I, Hudson JA (2002) Numerical methods in Roch Mechanics. International journal of rock mechanincs and mining science, vol. 39, pp. 409-427.
[12] Itasca (2004) UDEC manuals, Minneapolis: Itasca Consulting group Inc.
[13] SCE Company (2006) Geological and Engineering Geological Report for Amirkabir Water Conveyance Tunnel Project (Lot1), unpublished report.