Enzyme Involvement in the Biosynthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles by Geobacillus wiegelii Strain GWE1 Isolated from a Drying Oven

Authors: Daniela N. Correa-Llantén, Sebastián A. Muñoz-Ibacache, Mathilde Maire, Jenny M. Blamey

Abstract:

The biosynthesis of nanoparticles by microorganisms, on the contrary to chemical synthesis, is an environmentally-friendly process which has low energy requirements. In this investigation, we used the microorganism Geobacillus wiegelii, strain GWE1, an aerobic thermophile belonging to genus Geobacillus, isolated from a drying oven. This microorganism has the ability to reduce selenite evidenced by the change of color from colorless to red in the culture. Elemental analysis and composition of the particles were verified using transmission electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. The nanoparticles have a defined spherical shape and a selenium elemental state. Previous experiments showed that the presence of the whole microorganism for the reduction of selenite was not necessary. The results strongly suggested that an intracellular NADPH/NADH-dependent reductase mediates selenium nanoparticles synthesis under aerobic conditions. The enzyme was purified and identified by mass spectroscopy MALDI-TOF TOF technique. The enzyme is a 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase. Histograms of nanoparticles sizes were obtained. Size distribution ranged from 40-160 nm, where 70% of nanoparticles have less than 100 nm in size. Spectroscopic analysis showed that the nanoparticles are composed of elemental selenium. To analyse the effect of pH in size and morphology of nanoparticles, the synthesis of them was carried out at different pHs (4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0). For thermostability studies samples were incubated at different temperatures (60, 80 and 100 ºC) for 1 h and 3 h. The size of all nanoparticles was less than 100 nm at pH 4.0; over 50% of nanoparticles have less than 100 nm at pH 5.0; at pH 6.0 and 8.0 over 90% of nanoparticles have less than 100 nm in size. At neutral pH (7.0) nanoparticles reach a size around 120 nm and only 20% of them were less than 100 nm. When looking at temperature effect, nanoparticles did not show a significant difference in size when they were incubated between 0 and 3 h at 60 ºC. Meanwhile at 80 °C the nanoparticles suspension lost its homogeneity. A change in size was observed from 0 h of incubation at 80ºC, observing a size range between 40-160 nm, with 20% of them over 100 nm. Meanwhile after 3 h of incubation at size range changed to 60-180 nm with 50% of them over 100 nm. At 100 °C the nanoparticles aggregate forming nanorod structures. In conclusion, these results indicate that is possible to modulate size and shape of biologically synthesized nanoparticles by modulating pH and temperature.

Keywords: Genus Geobacillus, NADPH/NADH-dependent reductase, Selenium nanoparticles.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1097351

References:

[1] C. Ip, “Selenium and ER stress response: Implication and exploitation for cancer therapy”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Selenium in Biology and Medicine, July 2006, pp. 25-30, University Wisconsin, Madison, pp: 63-63.
[2] X. Gao, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, “Hollow sphere selenium nanoparticles. Their in vitro anti-hydroxyl radical effect”. Adv. Mater, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 290- 293, Feb. 2002.
[3] H. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Yu, “Elemental selenium at nano size possesses lower toxicity without compromising the fundamental effect on selenoenzymes: comparison with selenomethionine in mice”, Free Radic. Biol. Med., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1524-1533, May 2007.
[4] D. Peng, J. Zhang, Q. Liu, E. Taylor, “Size effect of elemental selenium nanoparticles (Nano-Se) at supranutritional levels on selenium accumulation and glutathione S-transferase activity”, J. Inorg. Biochem., vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 1457-1463, Oct. 2007.
[5] R. Oremland, M. Herbel, J. Blum, S. Langley, T. Beveridge, P. Jayan, T. Sutto, A. Ellis, S. Curran, “Structural and spectral features of selenium nanospheres produced by Se-respiring bacteria”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol., 70, no. 1, pp. 52-60, Jan. 2004.
[6] P. Tejo, N. Sharma, R. Prakash, K. Raina, J. Fellowes, C. Pearce, J. Lloyd, R. Pattrick, “Aerobic microbial manufacture of nanoscale selenium: exploiting nature’s bio-nanomineralization potential”, Biotechnol. Lett., vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1857-1862, Aug. 2009.
[7] V. Yadav, N. Sharma, R. Prakash, K. Raina, L. Bharadwaj, P. Tejo, “Generation of Selenium containing Nano-structures by soil bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa”, Biotechnol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 299-304, 2008.
[8] A. Abdelouas, W. Gong, W. Lutze, J. Shelnutt, R. Franco, I. Moura, “Using cytochrome c3 to make selenium nanowires” Chem. Mater., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1510-1512, May 2000.
[9] Y. Gorby, T. Beveridge, R. Blakemore, “Characterization of the bacterial magnetosome membrane”. J. Bacteriol., vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 834-841, Feb. 1988.
[10] W. Leinfelder, K. Forchhammer, F. Zinoni, G. Sawers, M. Mandrand- Berthelot, A. Böck, “Escherichia coli genes whose products are involved in selenium metabolism”. J. Bacteriol., vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 540-546, Feb. 1988.
[11] M. Tanaka, Y. Okamura, A. Arakaki, T. Tanaka, H. Takeyama, T. Matsunaga, “Origin of magnetosome membrane: proteomic analysis of magnetosome membrane and comparison with cytoplasmic membrane”, Proteomics, vol. 6, no. 19, pp. 5234-5247, Oct. 2006.
[12] A. Arakaki, J. Webb, T. Matsunaga, “A novel protein tightly bound to bacterial magnetic particles in magnetospirillum magneticum strain AMB-1” J. Biol. Chem. Vol. 278, no. 10, pp. 8745-8750, Mar. 2003.
[13] G. Kaur, M. Iqbal, M. Bakshi, “Biomineralization of fine selenium crystalline rods and amorphous spheres”. J. Phys. Chem. C vol. 113, no. 31, pp. 13670-13676, July 2009.
[14] J. Dobias, E. Suvorova, R. Bernier-Latmani, “Role of proteins in controlling selenium nanoparticle size”, Nanotechnology, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 1-9, May 2011.
[15] S. He, Z. Guo, Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. Wang, N. Gu, “Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using the bacteria Rhodopseudomonas capsulata”. Mater Lett., vol. 61, no. 18, pp. 3984-3987, July 2007.
[16] D. Correa-Llantén, J. Larraín-Linton, P. Muñoz, M. Castro., F. Boehmwald, J. Blamey, “Characterization of the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus sp. Strain GWE1 isolated from a sterilization oven”, Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 278-283, Sept. 2013.
[17] M. Amenábar, J. Blamey, “Purification and characterization of a thermostable glutamate dehydrogenase from a thermophilic bacterium isolated from a sterilization drying oven”, B.M.B. Rep., vol., 45, no. 2, pp. 91-95, Feb. 2012.
[18] P. Fesharaki, P. Nazari, M. Shakibaie, S. Rezaie, M. Banoee, M. Abdollahi, A. Shahverdi, “Biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles using KlebsielIa pneumoniae and their recovery by a simple sterilization process”, Braz. J. Microbiol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 461–466, June 2010.