Sustainability and Promotion of Inland Waterway Transportation Projects in Colombia: Case of the Magdalena River

Authors: David Julian Bernal Melgarejo

Abstract:

Inland Waterway Transportation (IWT) is playing an important role in national transport systems, water transportation is considered to be safe, energy efficient and environmentally friendly mode of transport, all benefits of IWT cause national awareness increase, for instance the Colombian government is planning to restore the navigability of the most important river of the country, the Magdalena’s River navigability, embrace waterway transportation in Colombia could strength competitiveness while reduce most of the transport externalities. However, the current situation of the Magdalena is deplorable, the most important river of Colombia has been abandoned for decades and the solution is beyond of a single administrative entity. This paper analyzes the outcomes of the Navigation And Inland Waterway Action and Development in Europe program (NAIADES) as a prospective to develop a similar program in Colombia with similar objectives and guidelines, considering sustainability, guarantying the long-term future results and adaptability of the program. Identifying stakeholders and policy experts, a set of individual interviews were carried out; findings support the idea of lack of integration within governmental institutions and lack of importance in marketing promotion as possible drawbacks on the implementation of IWT projects.

Keywords: Inland waterway transportation, Logistics, Sustainability, Multimodal transport systems, Water transportation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1337559

References:

[1] Inter-american Development Bank, “Public-Private Collaboration on Productive Development Policies in Colombia Public-Private Collaboration on,” 2014.
[2] Ministerio de transporte de Colombia, “Diagnostico del transporte 2011,” 2011.
[3] ECLAC, “Environmental Performance Review Colombia Highlights 2014,” 2014.
[4] USACE, “U.S. Port and Inland Waterways Modernization,” 2012.
[5] S. Mihić, M. Mihajlovic, and I. Škiljaica, “European policy for the promotion of inland waterway transport: A case study of the Danube River,” vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2498–2507, 2012.
[6] D. V Grier, “The Declining Reliability of the U.S. Inland Waterway System.”
[7] G. D. Escobar, “Puerto Multimodal de La Dorada,” Rev. Eje 21, 2014.
[8] DNP, “Documento Conpes 3758,” Bogotá D.C, 2013.
[9] D. P. Dolowitz and D. Marsh, “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making,” vol. 13, no. 1, 2000.
[10] C. Boyce and P. Neale, “Conducting In-Depth interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews,” 2006.
[11] T. Oisín, “Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Nonprobability Sampling,” Polit. Sci. Polit., vol. 40, no. 4, p. 24, 2007.
[12] The European Commission, Communication from the commission on the promotion of inland waterway transport “NAIADES.” 2006, pp. 1–15.
[13] The European Commission, “Mid-term progress report on the implementation of the NAIADES Action Programme for the promotion of inland waterway transport,” 2011.
[14] The European Commission, “Guidance document on Inland waterway transport and Natura 2000,” 2012.
[15] Y. Mahieu, T. Eu, and C. Republic, “Transport networks concentrated around economic hubs,” 2011.
[16] The European Commission, “Main Tables”. 2014. (Online). Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/transport/data/main_ta bles. (Accessed: 20-Apr-2014).
[17] D. Depietro, “Transport on the magdalena river: opportunities, advantages, and institutional challenges.”
[18] Cormagdalena, “Plan de manejo de la cuenca del río Magdalena-Cauca,” 2007.
[19] A. Blackman, R. Morgenstern, and E. Topping, “Institutional Analysis of Colombia’s Autonomous Regional Corporations (CARs),” 2006.