Enzymatic Saccharification of Dilute Alkaline Pre-treated Microalgal (Tetraselmis suecica) Biomass for Biobutanol Production

Authors: M. A. Kassim, R. Potumarthi, A. Tanksale, S. C. Srivatsa, S. Bhattacharya

Abstract:

Enzymatic saccharification of biomass for reducing sugar production is one of the crucial processes in biofuel production through biochemical conversion. In this study, enzymatic saccharification of dilute potassium hydroxide (KOH) pre-treated Tetraselmis suecica biomass was carried out by using cellulase enzyme obtained from Trichoderma longibrachiatum. Initially, the pre-treatment conditions were optimised by changing alkali reagent concentration, retention time for reaction, and temperature. The T. suecica biomass after pre-treatment was also characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectra and Scanning Electron Microscope. These analyses revealed that the functional group such as acetyl and hydroxyl groups, structure and surface of T. suecica biomass were changed through pre-treatment, which is favourable for enzymatic saccharification process. Comparison of enzymatic saccharification of untreated and pre-treated microalgal biomass indicated that higher level of reducing sugar can be obtained from pre-treated T. suecica. Enzymatic saccharification of pre-treated T. suecica biomass was optimised by changing temperature, pH, and enzyme concentration to solid ratio ([E]/[S]). Highest conversion of carbohydrate into reducing sugar of 95% amounted to reducing sugar yield of 20 (wt%) from pre-treated T. suecica was obtained from saccharification, at temperature: 40°C, pH: 4.5 and [E]/[S] of 0.1 after 72 h of incubation. Hydrolysate obtained from enzymatic saccharification of pretreated T. suecica biomass was further fermented into biobutanol using Clostridium saccharoperbutyliticum as biocatalyst. The results from this study demonstrate a positive prospect of application of dilute alkaline pre-treatment to enhance enzymatic saccharification and biobutanol production from microalgal biomass.

Keywords: Microalgal biomass, enzymatic saccharification, biobutanol, fermentation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096021

References:

[1] Naik, S.N., Goud, V.V., Rout, P.K., Dalai, A.K. (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14: 578-597.
[2] Dürre, P. (2007) Biobutanol: An attractive biofuel. Biotechnol J 2: 525- 1534.
[3] Jang, Y.S., Malaviya, A., Cho, C., Lee, J., Lee, S.Y. (2012) Butanol production from renewable biomass by Clostridia. Bioresource Technol 123: 653-663.
[4] Qureshi, N., Ezeji, T.C. (2008) Butanol, ‘a superior biofuel’ production from agricultural residues (renewable biomass): recent progress in technology. Biofuels, Bioprod Bior 2: 319-330.
[5] Ellis, J.T., Hengge, N.N., Sims, R.C., Miller, C.D. (2012) Acetone, butanol, and ethanol production from wastewater algae. Bioresource Technol 111: 491-495.
[6] Harun, R., Singh, M., Forde, G.M., Danquah, M.K. (2010) Bioprocess engineering of microalgae to produce a variety of consumer products. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14: 1037-1047.
[7] Balat, M. (2011) Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: A review. Energ Convers Manage 52: 858- 875.
[8] Harun, R., Danquah, M.K. (2011) Enzymatic hydrolysis of microalgal biomass for bioethanol production. Chem Eng J, 168: 1079-1084.
[9] Zeng, X., Danquah, M.K., Halim, R., Yang, S., Chen, X.D., Lu, Y. (2013) Comparative physicochemical analysis of suspended and immobilized cultivation of Chlorella sp. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88: 247-254.
[10] Nielsen, S.S. (2010) Phenol-Sulfuric Acid Method for Total Carbohydrates, Food Analysis Laboratory Manual, Springer US2010, pp. 47-53.
[11] González López, C.V., García, M.D.C.C., Fernández, F.G.A., Bustos, C.S., Chisti, Y., Sevilla, J.M.F. (2010) Protein measurements of microalgal and cyanobacterial biomass. Bioresource Technol 101: 7587- 7591.
[12] McIntosh, S., Vancov, T. (2010) Enhanced enzyme saccharification of Sorghum bicolor straw using dilute alkali pretreatment. Bioresource Technol. 101: 6718-6727.
[13] Saha, B.C., Cotta, M.A. (2008) Lime pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of rice hulls to ethanol. Biomass Bioenerg 32: 971-977.
[14] Baadhe, R.R., Potumarthi, R., Mekala, N.K. (2014) Influence of dilute acid and alkali pretreatment on reducing sugar production from corncobs by crude enzymatic method: A comparative study. Bioresource Technol 162: 213-217.
[15] Rawat, R., Kumbhar, B.K., Tewari, L. (2013) Optimization of alkali pretreatment for bioconversion of poplar (Populus deltoides) biomass into fermentable sugars using response surface methodology. Ind Crop Prod 44: 220-226.
[16] Kim, S., Holtzapple, M.T. (2005) Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresource Technol 96: 1994-2006.
[17] Zhu, L., O’Dwyer, J.P., Chang, V.S., Granda, C.B., Holtzapple, M.T. (2008) Structural features affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility, Bioresource Technol 99: 3817-3828.
[18] Chen, Y., Stevens, M.A., Zhu, Y., Holmes, J., Xu, H. (2013) Understanding of alkaline pretreatment parameters for corn stover enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Biofuels 6: 1-10.
[19] Lima, M.A., Lavorente, G.B., Silva, H.K.D., Bragatto, J., Rezende, C.A., Bernardinelli, O.D., deAzevedo, E.R., Gomez, L.D., McQueen- Mason, S.J., Labate, C.A., Polikarpov, I. (2013) Effects of pretreatment on morphology, chemical composition and enzymatic digestibility of eucalyptus bark: a potentially valuable source of fermentable sugars for biofuel production – part 1. Biotechnol Biofuels 6: 1-17.
[20] Grierson, S., Strezov, V., Shah, P. (2011) Properties of oil and char derived from slow pyrolysis of Tetraselmis chui. Bioresource Technol 102: 8232-8240.
[21] Siengchum, T., Isenberg, M., Chuang, S.S.C. (2013) Fast pyrolysis of coconut biomass – An FTIR study. Fuel 105: 559-565.
[22] Kumar, L., Chandra, R., Saddler, J. (2011) Influence of steam pretreatment severity on post-treatments used to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated softwoods at low enzyme loadings. Biotechnol Bioeng 108: 2300-2311.
[23] Sun, X.F., Xu, F., Sun, R.C., Fowler, P., Baird, M.S. (2005) Characteristics of degraded cellulose obtained from steam-exploded wheat straw. Carbohyd Res 340: 97-106.
[24] Laureano-Perez, L., Teymouri, F., Alizadeh, H., Dale, B. (2005) Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 124: 1081-1099.
[25] Gautam, S.P., Bundela, P.S., Pandey, A.K., Khan, J., Awasthi, M.K., Sarsaiya, S. (2011) Optimization for the production of cellulase enzyme from municipal solid waste residue by two novel cellulolytic fungi. Biotechnol Res Intern 1-8.
[26] Andreaus, J., Azevedo, H., Cavaco-Paulo, A. (1999) Effects of temperature on the cellulose binding ability of cellulase enzymes. J Mol Catal B: Enzym 7: 233-239.
[27] Hamzah, F., Idris, A., Shuan, T.K. (2011) Preliminary study on enzymatic hydrolysis of treated oil palm (Elaeis) empty fruit bunches fibre (EFB) by using combination of cellulase and β 1-4 glucosidase. Biomass Bioenerg 35: 1055-1059.
[28] Xu, Z., Wang, Q., Jiang, Z., Yang, X.X., Ji, Y. (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated soybean straw. Biomass Bioenerg 31: 162-167.