Effect of Sensory Manipulations on Human Joint Stiffness Strategy and Its Adaptation for Human Dynamic Stability

Authors: Aizreena Azaman, Mai Ishibashi, Masanori Ishizawa, Shin-Ichiroh Yamamoto

Abstract:

Sensory input plays an important role to human posture control system to initiate strategy in order to counterpart any unbalance condition and thus, prevent fall. In previous study, joint stiffness was observed able to describe certain issues regarding to movement performance. But, correlation between balance ability and joint stiffness is still remains unknown. In this study, joint stiffening strategy at ankle and hip were observed under different sensory manipulations and its correlation with conventional clinical test (Functional Reach Test) for balance ability was investigated. In order to create unstable condition, two different surface perturbations (tilt up-tilt (TT) down and forward-backward (FB)) at four different frequencies (0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 Hz) were introduced. Furthermore, four different sensory manipulation conditions (include vision and vestibular system) were applied to the subject and they were asked to maintain their position as possible. The results suggested that joint stiffness were high during difficult balance situation. Less balance people generated high average joint stiffness compared to balance people. Besides, adaptation of posture control system under repetitive external perturbation also suggested less during sensory limited condition. Overall, analysis of joint stiffening response possible to predict unbalance situation faced by human

Keywords: Balance ability, joint stiffness, sensory, adaptation, dynamic.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096017

References:

[1] N. M. Arts. (2009, Balance Disorders. NIDCD Fact Sheet.
[2] M. Lacour, et al., "Posture control, aging, and attention resources: Models and posture-analysis methods," Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 38, pp. 411-421, 2008.
[3] D. A. Winter, et al., "Stiffness Control of Balance in Quiet Standing " Journal of Neurophysiology vol. 80, p. 12, 1998.
[4] K. McGinnis, et al., "Dynamic joint stiffness and co-contraction in subjects after total knee arthroplasty," Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 28, pp. 205-210, 2013.
[5] R. C. Fitzpatrick, et al., "Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components," The Journal of Physiology, vol. 454, pp. 533-547, August 1, 1992 1992.
[6] I. D. Loram, et al., "Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: is sway size controlled by ankle impedance?," J Physiol, vol. 532, pp. 879-91, May 1 2001.
[7] C. Maurer and R. J. Peterka, "A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control," J Neurophysiol, vol. 93, pp. 189-200, Jan 2005.
[8] H. van der Kooij, et al., "Comparison of different methods to identify and quantify balance control," Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 145, pp. 175-203, 2005.
[9] M. Schmid, et al., "Adaptation to continuous perturbation of balance: Progressive reduction of postural muscle activity with invariant or increasing oscillations of the center of mass depending on perturbation frequency and vision conditions," Human Movement Science, vol. 30, pp. 262-278, 2011.
[10] M. D. Mann, The Nervous System Iand Behavior: An Introduction. Hagerstown, Maryland: Harper and Row, 1981.
[11] P. W. Duncan, et al., "Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance," J Gerontol, vol. 45, pp. M192-7, Nov 1990.