Analysis of Entrepreneurship in Industrial Cluster

Authors: Wen-Hsiang Lai

Abstract:

Except for the internal aspects of entrepreneurship (i.e.motivation, opportunity perspective and alertness), there are external aspects that affecting entrepreneurship (i.e. the industrial cluster). By comparing the machinery companies located inside and outside the industrial district, this study aims to explore the cluster effects on the entrepreneurship of companies in Taiwan machinery clusters (TMC). In this study, three factors affecting the entrepreneurship in TMC are conducted as “competition”, “embedded-ness” and “specialized knowledge”. The “competition” in the industrial cluster is defined as the competitive advantages that companies gain in form of demand effects and diversified strategies; the “embedded-ness” refers to the quality of company relations (relational embedded-ness) and ranges (structural embedded-ness) with the industry components (universities, customers and complementary) that affecting knowledge transfer and knowledge generations; the “specialized knowledge” shares theinternal knowledge within industrial clusters. This study finds that when comparing to the companieswhich are outside the cluster, the industrial cluster has positive influence on the entrepreneurship. Additionally, the factor of “relational embedded-ness” has significant impact on the entrepreneurship and affects the adaptation ability of companies in TMC. Finally, the factor of “competition” reveals partial influence on the entrepreneurship.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Industrial Cluster, Industrial District, Economies of Agglomerations, Taiwan Machinery Cluster (TMC).

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1094124

References:

[1] Schumpeter, J.A. (1965). Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History. In: Aitken HG (ed) Explorations in enterprise. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
[2] Fransman, M. (1986). "International competitiveness, technical change and the state: The machine tool industry in Taiwan and Japan," World Development, 14(12), 1375-1396.
[3] Covin, J. G. and Slevin, D. P., 1991. A Conceptual Model Of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior.
[4] Zahra, S.A., 1993. A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior.
[5] Audretsch, D. B. and Lehmann, E. E. (2005) "Entrepreneurial Access and Absorption of Knowledge Spillovers: Strategic Board and Managerial Composition for Competitive Advantage," CEPR Discussion Papers 5335, C.E.P.R.
[6] Eckhardt, J.T. and Shane, S.S., 2003. Opportunities and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management 29(3), 333–349.
[7] Miller, D. (1983), "The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firm,” Management Science, 29, 770-791.
[8] Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan: London.
[9] Rabellotti. R. (1998) "Collective effects in Italian and Mexican footwear industrial clusters,”Small Business Economics, 10(3), 243-262.
[10] Sørensen, J.B. and Sorenson, O.(2003), "From Conception to Birth: Opportunity Perception and Resource Mobilization in Entrepreneurship,” Advances in Strategic Management, 20, 89-117.
[11] Sorenson, O. and Audia, P.G. (2000), "The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States ,” American Journal of Sociology, 106, 424-462.
[12] Gartner, W.B.,1985. A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, 696-706.
[13] Canina, L., Enz, C.A. and Harrison, J.S. (2005), "Agglomeration effects and strategic orientation: Evidence from the US lodging industry,” Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 565-581.
[14] Uzzi. B. and Gillespie.J.J., 2002. Knowledge Spillover In Corporate Financing Networks: Embedded-ness and The Firm’s Debt Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 595–618.
[15] Dayasindhu. N., 2002.Embeddedness, knowledge transfer, industry clusters and global competitiveness: a case study of the Indian software industry. Technovation 22, 551–560.
[16] Rajneesh, N.andSantangelo, G.D. (2011), "New insights on the role of location advantages in international innovation,” MERIT Working Papers 045, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
[17] Krugman, K.(1991), "What's new about the new economic geography?”Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), 7-17.
[18] Bentler, P.M. and Bonnet, D.C. (1980), "Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structure,” Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
[19] Phelps, N.A., 1992. External Economies, Agglomeration and Flexible Accumulation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 17( 1),35-46
[20] MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W. and Sugawara, H. M. (1996), "Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling,”Psychological Methods, 1(2),130-149.
[21] Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nded.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[22] Brookfield, J.,2003. Firm Strategy, Organizational Structure and Industrial Districts: A Study of Taiwan’s Machine Tool Industry.