Secondary Science Teachers’ Views about Purposes of Practical Works in School Science
Authors: Kew-Cheol Shim, Sung-Hwan Moon, Ji-Hyon Kil, Kyoungho Kim
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper was to examine views of secondary school science teachers about purposes to use practical works in school science. The instrument to survey consisted eighteen items, which were categorized into four components as follows: ‘Scientific inquiry’, ‘Scientific knowledge’, ‘Science-related attitude’, and ‘STS (science-technology-society)’. Subjects were 152 secondary school science teachers (male 70 and female 82; middle school 50 and high school 102), who are teaching in 42 schools of 8 provinces. On the survey, science teachers were asked to answer on 5-point Lickert scale (from 1 to 5) how they thought of using practical works on purposes with domains of science objectives in school. They had positive views about using practical works for improving scientific inquiry process skills, science-related attitudes, and perceptions about STS literacy, and acquiring scientific knowledge. They would have the most willingness of using practical works for ‘Scientific Inquiry’ among domains of science objectives in school.
Keywords: Secondary school, science teacher, practical work, scientific inquiry, scientific knowledge, science-related attitude, STS.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093754
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2324References:
[1] H. Cho, I. H. Yang, and H. Lee, "Comparison between secondary school science teachers' and students' perceptions about the important aims of laboratory activities in science instructions”, Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, vol. 32., no. 2, pp. 103-120, Dec. 2008.
[2] MOE (Ministry of Education), Science Curriculum. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Daehangyogwaseo, Inc., Dec. 1997.
[3] MOEST (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology),Science Curriculum for High School Students. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Dec. 2009.
[4] MOEST (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology),Curriculum for Middle School Students. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Dec. 2009.
[5] R. Millar, The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy of Science, Oct. 2004.
[6] E. Woodley, "Practical work in school science - why is it important?”, School Science Review, vol. 91, no. 335, pp. 49-51, Dec. 2009.
[7] R. Watson, The role of practical work. In M. Monk & J. Osborne, Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say, Buckingham, UK : Open University Press. 2000, pp. 57-71.
[8] K. C. Shim, Y. S. Kang, J. B. Shin, and H. S. Kim, "An analysis of learning contents in the life science textbooks under the 7th curriculum: on the unit of stimuli and response”, Biology Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 114-123, Jun. 2004.
[9] K. C. Shim, H. S. Kim, and Y. C. Park, "Analysis of inquiry activities presented in the 7th grade life science textbooks based on the 7th curriculum”, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 551-560, Sep. 2002.
[10] D. Hodson, Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory, In J. J. Wellington, Practical work in school Science, London, UK: Routledge, 1998, pp. 93-108.
[11] D. Hodson, "A critical look at practical work in school science”, School Science Review, vol. 71, no. 256, pp. 33-40, Mar. 1990.
[12] A. Hofstein, Practical Work and Science Education II. In P. Fensham, Development and dilemmas in Science Education, New York, USA: The Farmer Press, 1998, pp. 194-195.
[13] R. Lazarowitz, andP. Tamir, Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. Gabel, Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, New York, USA : Macmillan, 1994, pp. 94-130.
[14] S. Y. Bae, and Y. Park, "Teachers’ perceptions about priority and hinderance of science objectives”, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 572-581, Dec. 2000.
[15] SCORE (Science Community Representing Education), Practical work in science: a report and proposal for a strategic framework, London, UK : Gatsby Technical Education Project, Dec. 2008.
[16] V. N. Lunetta, and A. Hofstein, Simulations and laboratory practical activity, In B. E. Woolnough, Practical science: The role and reality of practical work in school science, London, UK : Open University Press, 1991, pp. 125-137.
[17] H. L. Kim, and S. H.Yeau," An analysis on scientific inquiry process in the middle school 8th grade science textbook published by 7th national curriculum and students”, Biology Education, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 390-397, Dec. 2004.
[18] M. K. Kim, J. L. Hong and N. K. Chang, "Development of the instrument for assessing the degree of ambivalence of the attitudes of high school students”, Biology Education, vol. 29,no. 1, pp. 27-33, Mar. 2001.
[19] K. C. Shim, B. Y. Lee, and H. S. Kim, Analysis of learning concepts related to metabolism presented in the life field of science textbooks according to the national common basic curriculum, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, vol. 23, no.6, pp. 627-633, Dec. 2003.
[20] S. C. Song, and K. C. Shim, "Study on perception of high school students of biotechnology”, Environmental Education, vol. 23, no. 1,pp. 99-111, Mar. 2010.
[21] S. C. Song, H. J. Kim, C. H. Lee, J. M. Kim, and K. C. Shim, "Study on high school students' interest in biology”, Biology Education, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 384-393, Sep. 2007.
[22] H. L. Hong, K. C. Shim, and N. K. Chang, "A study of Korean middle school students' interests in biology and their implications for biology education” International Journal of Science Education, vo. 20, no. 8, pp. 989-999, Sep. 1998.
[23] R. Yager, "STS : Thinking over the years”, The Science Teacher, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 52-53, Mar. 1990
[24] J. H. Kim, K. C. Shim, S. C. Song, K. Kim, N. I. Kim, J. Bae, and K. H. So, "Secondary school students’ perceptions about biological issues in South Korea”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 440-442, Jun. 2012.
[25] E. Yildiz, E. Akapinar, B. Aydogdu, and O. Ergin, "Science teachers’ attitudes towards aims of the science experiments’, Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-6, Dec. 2006.