Proximate Composition and Textural Properties of Cooked Sausages Formulated from Mechanically Deboned Chicken Meat with Addition of Chicken Offal
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33090
Proximate Composition and Textural Properties of Cooked Sausages Formulated from Mechanically Deboned Chicken Meat with Addition of Chicken Offal

Authors: Marija R. Jokanović, Vladimir M. Tomović, Mihajlo T. Jović, Branislav V. Šojić, Snežana B. Škaljac, Tatjana A. Tasić, Predrag M. Ikonić

Abstract:

Proximate composition (moisture, protein, total fat, and total ash) and textural characteristics (hardness, adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness and firmness and work of shear) of cooked sausages formulated from mechanically deboned chicken meat (MDCM) with addition of chicken offal (heart, gizzard or liver) were investigated. Chicken offal replaced equal weight (15 kg) of MDCM in standard sausage formulation. Regarding proximate composition sausage with heart addition was significantly (P<0.05) lower in moisture content (70.45%) than sausage with liver addition (71.35%), and significantly (P<0.05) the highest in total ash content (2.83%). Sausage with gizzard addition was significantly higher in protein content (9.77%) than sausage with liver addition (9.42%). Total fat content didn’t significantly (P>0.05) differ among all three sausages. The effect of offal addition was more notable in Warner-Bratzler shear test results than in texture profile analysis test. Firmness and work of shear were significantly different (P<0.05) among all three sausages. Sausage with liver addition was significantly (P<0.05) lower in hardness (1672 g) and chewiness (1020 g) and numerically the lowest in springiness (0.90) and adhesiveness (–70 g*s) comparing with other two sausages. Sausage with heart addition was significantly (P<0.05) higher in cohesiveness (0.74) comparing with other two sausages.

Keywords: Cooked sausage, mechanically deboned chicken meat, offal, proximate composition, texture

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1092203

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3936

References:


[1] M. B. Mielnik, K. Aaby, K. Rolfsen, M. R. Ellekjær and A. Nilsson, "Quality of comminuted sausages formulated from mechanically deboned poultry meat,” Meat Sci. vol. 61, pp. 73–84, 2002.
[2] F. G. Daros, M. L. Masson and S. C. Amico, "The influence of the addition of mechanically deboned poultry meat on the rheological properties of sausage,” J. Food Eng. vol. 68, pp. 185–189, 2005.
[3] S. Savadkoohi, K. Shamsi, H. Hoogenkamp, A. Javadi and A. Farahnaky, "Mechanical and gelling properties of comminuted sausages containing chicken MDM,” J. Food Eng. vol. 117, pp. 255–262, 2013.
[4] A. G. T. Pereira, E. Mendes Ramos, J. T. Teixeira, G. Pereira Cardoso, A. de Lemos Souza Ramos and P. R. Fontes, "Effects of the addition of mechanically deboned poultry meat and collagen fibers on quality characteristics of frankfurter-type sausages,” Meat Sci. vol. 89, pp. 519–525, 2011.
[5] L.A. Morin, F. Temelli and L. McMullen, "Interactions between meat proteins and barley (Hordeum spp.) b-glucan within a reduced-fat breakfast sausage system,” Meat Sci. vol. 68, pp. 419–430, 2004.
[6] S. Darine, V. Christophe and D. Gholamreza, "Production and functional properties of beef lung protein concentrates,” Meat Sci. vol. 84, pp. 315–322, 2010.
[7] H. W. Ockerman and C. L. Hansen, "Animal By-Product Processing,” Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd. 1988.
[8] W. F. Spooncer, "Organs and glands as human food”, In Edible meat by-products, Advances in meat research, vol. 5, Pearson AM, Dutson TR, Eds. London, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1988, pp. 197–217.
[9] T. Pussa, P. Raudsepp, P. Toomik, R. Pallin, U. Maeorg, S. Kuusik, R. Soidla, and M. Rei, "A study of oxidation products of free polyunsaturated fatty acids in mechanically deboned meat,” J Food Compos Anal. Vol. 22, pp. 307–314, 2009.
[10] J. R. Romans, C. W. Carlson, W. J. Costello, M. L. Greaser and K. W. Jones, "The meat we eat”. Interstate publishers Inc, Danville, 1994.
[11] ISO 1442, "Meat and meat products. Determination of moisture content (Reference method),” Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation, 1997.
[12] ISO 937, "Meat and meat products. Determination of nitrogen content (Reference method),” Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation, 1978.
[13] ISO 1443, "Meat and meat products. Determination of total fat content”. Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation, 1973.
[14] ISO 936, "Meat and meat products. Determination of total ash”. Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation, 1998.
[15] M. C. Bourne, "Texture profile analysis," Food Technol. vol. 32, pp. 62–66, 1978.
[16] F. Ruiz de Huidobro, E. Miguel, B. Blazquez and E. Onega, "A comparison between two methods (Warner–Bratzler and texture profile analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat,” Meat Sci. vol. 69, pp. 527–536, 2005.
[17] StatSoft, Inc. (2012). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12. Available: http://www.statsoft.com/
[18] J. Ayo, J. Carballo, M. T. Solas and F. Jimenez-Colmenero, "Physicochemical and sensory properties of healthier frankfurters as affected by walnut and fat content,” Food Chem. vol. 107, pp. 1547–1552, 2008.
[19] A. Totosaus and M. Lourdes Perez-Chabela, "Textural properties and microstructure of low-fat and sodium-reduced meat batters formulated with gellan gum and dicationic salts,” Food Sci Technol-Leb. vol. 42, pp. 563–569, 2009.
[20] H. -S. Yang, S. -G. Choi, J. -T. Jeon, G. -B. Park and S. -T. Joo, "Textural and sensory properties of low fat pork sausages with added hydrated oatmeal and tofu as texture-modifying agents,” Meat Sci. vol. 75, pp. 283–289, 2007.