Comparison of Finite-Element and IEC Methods for Cable Thermal Analysis under Various Operating Environments
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Comparison of Finite-Element and IEC Methods for Cable Thermal Analysis under Various Operating Environments

Authors: M. S. Baazzim, M. S. Al-Saud, M. A. El-Kady

Abstract:

In this paper, steady-state ampacity (current carrying capacity) evaluation of underground power cable system by using analytical and numerical methods for different conditions (depth of cable, spacing between phases, soil thermal resistivity, ambient temperature, wind speed), for two system voltage level were used 132 and 380 kV. The analytical method or traditional method that was used is based on the thermal analysis method developed by Neher-McGrath and further enhanced by International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and published in standard IEC 60287. The numerical method that was used is finite element method and it was recourse commercial software based on finite element method. 

Keywords: Cable ampacity, Finite element method, underground cable, thermal rating.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1091184

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 5779

References:


[1] J. H. Neher and M.H. McGrath, "The Calculation of the Temperature Rise and Load Capability of Cable Systems”, AIEE Transactions – Power Apparatus and Systems, Part III, Vol. 76, Issue 3, Apr. 1957, pp. 752-764.
[2] IEC 60287, "Calculation of the Current Rating (100% Load Factor)”, 2006.
[3] Francisco de Leon, George J. Anders, "Effects of Backfilling on Cable Ampacity Analyzed With the Finite Element Method", IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery Vol. 23, No. 2, April 2008.
[4] Youyuan Wang, Rengang Chen, Weigen Chen, Jian Li, Lin Du, Qing Yang, "Calculation of the Current Carrying Capability of Duct Laying Electric Cable and Analysis of the Influential Factors", 2010 IEEE International Power Modulator and High Voltage Conference (IPMHVC),pp 735-738, Atanta, GA, USA, 23-27 May 2010.
[5] M. S. Al-Saud, M. A. El-Kady, R. D. Findlay, "Accurate Assessment of Thermal Field and Ampacity of Underground Power Cables", 2006 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE '06), pp 651-654, Ottawa, Canada, May 2006.
[6] M. S. Al-Saud, M. A. El-Kady, R. D. Findlay, "Advanced Thermal Field Sensitivity Analysis of Power Cables", 2007 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE '07), pp 133-136, Vancouver, Canada, 22-26 April 2007.
[7] S. Kahourzade, A. Mahmoudi, B. Nim Taj, O. Palizban, "Ampacity Calculation of the Underground Power Cables in Voluntary Conditions by Finite Element Method", 2011 8th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), pp 657-660, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 17-19 May 2011.
[8] M. A. Mozan, M. A. El-Kady, A. A. Mazi, "Advanced Thermal Analysis of Underground Power Cables", 5th International Middle East Power Conference (MEPCON'97), pp 506-510, Alexandria, Egypt, 4-6 January 1997.
[9] M. S. Al-Saud, M. A. El-Kady, R. D. Findlay, "Combined Simulation–Experimental Approach to Power Cable Thermal Loading Assessment”, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 2, No. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 13-21.
[10] From Saudi Electricity Company documents, Riyadh, 2013.
[11] Yongchun Liang, "Steady-state Thermal Analysis of Power Cable Systems in Ducts Using Streamline Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin Finite Element Method", IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 19, No. 1, February 2012.
[12] ES ISO 15099, "Thermal Performance of Windows, Doors and Shading Devices-Detailed Calculations”, 2012.
[13] C. Hannan, "Measurements and Modeling of Air and Flow in a Brick Wall Cavity”, Master thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2007.
[14] ANSYS Finite Element Simulation Software, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA.