Public Attachment to Religious Places: A Study of Place Attachment to Mosques in Malaysia
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Public Attachment to Religious Places: A Study of Place Attachment to Mosques in Malaysia

Authors: Mina Najafi, Mustafa Kamal Bin Mohd Shariff

Abstract:

Religious place attachment is an affective bond that develops between people and their religious settings. The published literature shows that although religion has a significant impact on the public ‘place attachment’, the architectural features and attributes of the places could still play an influencing role in strengthening this attachment. However, the role of architectural characteristics and features of the religious places, as the components that give them meaning(s), has not been adequately explored. This paper reports the impacts of factors influencing the physical and ambience quality of different styles of Malaysian mosques from the Muslim public perspective. Thereby, a survey was conducted to investigate Malaysian public attachment to selected five Malaysian state mosques with respect to their architectural characteristics and features. The survey employed the results of series of interviews as its theoretical basis. The finding proved that Malaysian ‘Muslim’ society has equally strong attachment to all selected mosques in spite of their different architectural styles. The findings also confirmed that the emotional attachment to the impressive aspects of architectural features (e.g. dome, minaret etc.) and the unique identity of the studied mosques is irrespective of the architectural styles, e.g. Modern vs. Postmodern. The paper also argued that religious activities and pleasant architectural characteristic of the studied places including the functional facilities are equally important factors in forming place attachment. This is a new approach to the study of physical and ambience quality of mosques, hence providing sufficient theoretical basis for further investigations and improvements.

Keywords: Place Attachment, Place Identity, Physical Features, Malaysian Mosques.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1090719

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 4322

References:


[1] Altman, I. and S.M. Low, Place attachment. 1992, New York: Plenum Press.
[2] Giuliani, M.V. and R. Feldman, Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1993. 13: p. 267-274.
[3] Manzo, L.C., Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003. 23.
[4] Kyle, G., et al., Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004. 24: p. 213-225.
[5] Hernandez, B., et al., Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007. 27: p. 310-319.
[6] Tuan, Y.F., Space and place: The perspective of experience. 1977, London: Edward Arnold.
[7] Hay, B., Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1998. 18: p. 5-29.
[8] Stokols, D., Instrumental and Spiritual Views of People-Environment Relations. American Psychologist, 1990. 45(5): p. 641-646.
[9] Mazumdar, S. and S. Mazumdar, Religion and place attachment: A study of sacred places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004. 24: p. 385-397.
[10] Watson, S. and J. Kucko, Thorncrown and the Mildred B. Cooper Chapels: Sacred Structures Designed by Fay Jones. Journal of Interior Design, 2001. 27(2): p. 14 - 25.
[11] White, J.F., Protestant Worship and Church Architecture: Theological and Historical Considerations. 2003: Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
[12] Ahmad, A.G. The Architectural Styles of Mosques in Malaysia: From Vernacular to Modern. in Symposium on Mosque Architecture: The Historic and Urban Developments of Mosque Architecture. 1999. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
[13] Stedman, R.C., Is it really just a social construction: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources, 2003. 16: p. 671-685.
[14] Mazumdar, S. and S. Mazumdar, Religion, immigration, and home making in diaspora: Hindu space in Southern California. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009. 29: p. 256-266.
[15] Canter, D., The psychology of place. 1977: The Architectural Press Ltd.
[16] Relph, E., Place and placelessness. 1976, London: Pion.
[17] Stokols, D. and S.A. Shumaker, People in places: A transactional view of settings, in Cognition social behaviour and the environment, Harvey, Editor. 1981, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
[18] Stedman, R.C., Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behaviour from place based cognitions, attitude and identity. Environment and behaviour, 2002. 34(5): p. 561-581.
[19] Smaldone, D., C. Harris, and N. Sanyal, An exploration of place as a process: The case of Jackson Hole, WY. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2005. 25: p. 397-414.
[20] Genereux, R.L., L.M. Ward, and J.A. Russell, The behavioral component in the meaning of places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1983. 3(1): p. 43-55.
[21] Gustafson, P., Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001. 21: p. 5-16.
[22] Davenport, M.A. and D.H. Anderson, Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society and Natural Resources, 2005. 18: p. 625-641.
[23] Proshansky, H.M., A.K. Fabian, and R. Kaminoff, Place- identity: physical world socialization of self. journal of Environmental Psychology, 1983. 3: p. 57-83.
[24] Bonaiuto, M., G. Breakwell, and I. Cano, Identity processes and environmental threat: the effects of nationalism and local identity upon perception of beach pollution. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1996. 6(1): p. 157-175.
[25] Devine-Wright, P. and E. Lyons, Remembering pasts and representing places: the construction of national identities in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1997. 17(1): p. 33-45.
[26] Steele, F., The sense of place. 1981: CBI Publishing Company, Inc.
[27] Rapoport, A., The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach. 1990: the university of Arizona Press, Tucson.
[28] Montgomery, J., Making a city: urbanity, Vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 1998. 3.
[29] Kaltenborn, B.P., Nature of place attachment: A study among recreation homeowners in southern Norway. Leisure Sciences, 1997. 19: p. 175-189.
[30] Williams, D.R., et al., Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 1992. 14: p. 29-46.
[31] Hummon, D.M., Community Attachment: Local Sentiment & Sense of place. 1992, New York: Plenum.
[32] Moore, R.L. and A.R. Graefe, Attachments to recreation settings: the case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 1994. 16: p. 17-31.
[33] Hidalgo, M.C. and B. Hernández, Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001. 21(3): p. 273-282.
[34] Williams, D.R. and J.W. Roggenbuck. Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. in Paper presented at the Outdoor Planning and Management, NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research. 1989. San Antonio, TX.
[35] Fried, M., Grieving for a lost home, in The urban condition: people and policy in the Metropolis, L.J. Duhl, Editor. 1963, Basic Books, Inc.: New York. p. 151-171.
[36] Tuan, Y.-F., Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. 1974, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[37] Tuan, Y.F., Place: An existential perspective The Geographical Review, 1975. 65: p. 15-65.
[38] Gieryn, T.F., A space for place in psychology. Annu.Review of Sociology, 2000. 26: p. 463-496.
[39] Mazumdar, S. and S. Mazumdar, Sacred space and place attachment. journal of Environmental Psychology, 1993. 13(3): p. 231-242.
[40] Barrie, T., Spiritual path, Sacred place. 1996, Boston: Shambala Publications, Inc.
[41] Eliade, M., The Sacred and The Profane: The Nature of Religion 1957, New York: Harcourt Publishing.
[42] Roberts, N.W., Building Type Basics for Places of Worship. 2004, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
[43] Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan, and R. Ryan, With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. 1998, Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
[44] Mohamad Rasdi, M.T., Mosque Architecture in Malaysia: Classification of Styles and Possible Influence Journal Alam Bina 2007. 9(3): p. 1-37.
[45] Kumar, R., Research methodology. A step-by-step guide for beginners. 2005: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[46] Curtis, W., Modern architecture Since 1900. Third ed. 1996: Phaidon Press, Oxford.
[47] Jencks, C., The New Paradigm in Architecture: Language of Post-Modern Architecture. 17 ed. 2002, London: Yale University Press.
[48] Najafi, M. and M.K.M. Sharif, Factors influencing public attachment to mosques in Malaysia. International Journal of Architectural Research (IJAR), 2011. 5(3): p. 07-24.
[49] Williams, D.R. and J.J. Vaske, The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 2003. 49(6): p. 830-840.
[50] Creswell, J.W., Qualitative inquiry and research design. 1998: Sage Pub.
[51] Fink, A., How to sample in survey. 2003, London: Sage Publication Ltd.
[52] Groat, L. and D. Wang, Architectural Research Methods. 2002: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
[53] Stake, E.R., The art of case study research. 1995: SAGE Publications.
[54] Nasar, J.L., Environmental aesthetic: Theory, research and applications. 1998: Cambridge University Press.
[55] Samah, B.A. and T. Suandi, Statistics for Social Research. 1999.
[56] Babbie, E., Survey Research Methods, ed. second. 1990, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
[57] Possick, C., Locating and relocating oneself as a Jewish Settler on the West Bank: Ideological squatting and eviction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004. 24(1): p. 53-69.
[58] Jones, L., The Hermeneutics of Sacred Architecture: Experience, Interpretation, Comparison, Volume 1: Monumental Occasions: Reflections on the Eventfulness of Religious Architecture. 2000, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[59] Shamai, S., Sense of Place: an Empirical Measurement. Geofmm, 1991. 22: p. 347-358.
[60] Jorgenson, B.R. and R.C. Steadman, A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005: p. 1-12.
[61] Mohamad Rasdi. M.T., The mosque as a community development center: Programme and architecture design guideline for contemporary Muslim societies. 1998, Johor Bahru: University Teknologi Malaysia.
[62] Mazumdar, S., Religious place attachment, squatting, and qualitative research: a commentary. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2005. 25: p. 87-95.
[63] Rose, G. Place and identity: A sense of place. In D. Massey & P. J. (eds.) (Eds.),A Place in the World? Place, Cultures, and Globalization (pp. 88-132). 1995. Oxford:The Open University.
[64] Lewicka, M. What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effectsof place scale on place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 2009. 30: p.35-51.
[65] Dubisch, J. In a Different Place: Pilgrimage, Gender and Politics of a GreekIsland. 1995. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[66] Rapoport, A. Human Aspects of Urban Form. 1977. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[67] Serageldin, I. Contemporary expressions of Islam in buildings:the religious and the secular. Paper presented at the Expressions of Islam inbuildings. 1990. Indonesia.
[68] Khan, H.-U., & Holod, R. The mosque and the modern world.1997. London: Thames, and Hudson.