Biomass and Productivity Studies of Up-Land and Low-Land Vegetation in the Neglected Margin of a Tropical Lake
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Biomass and Productivity Studies of Up-Land and Low-Land Vegetation in the Neglected Margin of a Tropical Lake

Authors: Mayank Singh, O. P. Singh ‘Vatsa’, M. P. Singh

Abstract:

Present paper deals with an evaluation of magnitude of changes in biomass and net primary productivity at ‘Gujar Tal’ sloppy lake margin at Jaunpur in tropical semi-arid region of eastern U.P. (India). The study site abandoned or neglected lands (50 ×125 m) was divided into two zones, i.e. upper zone (up-land) and lower zone (low-land). Maximum biomass in the upper zone of dominant weed Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Stapf. was 207.47 g m-2 and ‘rest weeds’ was 457.45 g m-2 both in the month of September. In contrast, the peak biomass value in the lower zone of dominant weed Oryza rufipogon Griff. was 1571.44 g m-2 in October and ‘rest weeds’ 270.65 g m-2 in February. Among the two zones, the peak total community biomass was observed 1655.62 g m-2 (October) in the lower zone while its peak value for the upper zone 457.45 g m-2 (September) was comparatively low. Maximum percentage contribution of dominant weeds (D. bipinnata and O. rufipogon) in the respective upper and lower zones and ‘rest weeds’ in both the zones varied in different months in the total community biomass. The peak net primary productivity of dominant weed (D. bipinnata) was 2.09g m-2 day-1 (September) and ‘rest weeds’ was 2.37 g m-2 day-1 (August) in the upper zone, while the lower zone for O. rufipogon was 5.25 g m-2 day-1 (June) as this zone was inundated later and ‘rest weeds’ was 2.08 g m-2 day-1 (January, 2009). The annual net production of total community at site I was highest, 409.58 g m-2 yr-1 in the upper zone followed by 395.58 g m-2 per eight month in the lower zone as this zone was flooded with water during rainy season. The site significance of variations in biomass in relation to plant species was tested by analysis of variance. It was significant between months in all the two zones (p<0.01 and p<0.05).

Keywords: Biomass, Neglected Lake Margin, Productivity, Vegetation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1326789

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1672

References:


[1] R. S. Ambasht, "Wetland ecology, an overview,” Proc .Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 78: Special Issue pp. 3-12, 5-Lajpatrai Road, Allahabad, India, 2008.
[2] R. S. Ambasht, and N. K. Ambasht, "Land–water ecotone ecology,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India. Sect. (Biological Sciences) Special Issue, Wetland Ecology .Editor Prof. R. S. Ambasht, pp. 99-105, 5-Lajapatrai, Road, Allahabad, India, 2008.
[3] V. R. P. Sinha, and B. C. Jha, "Threatened wetland need rehabilitation to enhance fish production in India,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India (Allahabad). Sect.B., vol. 78, Special Issue, 2008.
[4] K. R. Verma, "Phytosociology productivity and energetic of macrophytes of Gujar lake (Khetasarai) Jaunpur,” Ph.D. Thesis, B.H.U, Varanasi, India, 1979.
[5] B. D. Tripathi, A. R. Upadhyay, and V. Pathak, "Physico - chemical and biological characterization of the large Oxbow Surhatal Wetland,” Proc. Nat. Acad .Sci . India, Sect.B, vol. 78, Special Issue, Allahabad, India, 2008.
[6] E. P. Odum, "Organic Production and turnover in old field succession,” Ecology, vol. 41, pp. 34-49, 1960.
[7] H. Lieth, and R. H. Whittaker, "Primary productivity of biosphere,” Ecological Studies, Springer Verlag, New York, 1975.
[8] F. B. Golley, "Structure and function of old field broom sedge community,” Ecol. Monogr, vol. 35, pp. 113-131, 1965.
[9] D. Muller – Dambios, and H. Ellenberg, "Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology,” John Wiley and Sons, New York,1974.
[10] R. C. Campbell, "Stastics for Biologist,” Cambridge University Press Publication. Landon, 1974.
[11] J. S. Singh, and L. Krishnamurthy, "Analysis of structure and function of tropical grassland vegetation of India,” Indian Rev.Life. Sci, vol. 1, pp. 225-270, 1981.
[12] J. S. Singh, and P. S. Yadava, "Seasonal variation in composition, plant biomass and net primary productivity of Tropical Grassland Vegetation of India,” Indian Review of life Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 225-270, 1974.
[13] R. Misra, "The status of plant communities in the upper, Gangetic plains,” .J. of Ind. Bot. Society, vol. 38, pp. 1-7, 2010.
[14] S. Sinha, and M. P. Singh, "Biomass and Primary Productivity of a neglected wasteland at Jaunpur (U.P.) India,” Plant Archieves, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 719-723, 2010.
[15] M. P. Singh, and R. S. Ambasht. "Biomass and Productivity of riparian wasteland,” In, Srivastava , U.S. National Academy of Sciences, India. T. N. Khushoo and M. Sharma (eds.), pp. 91-101, 1989.