Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30222
Human Factors Issues and Measures in Advanced NPPs

Authors: Jun Su Ha

Abstract:

Various advanced technologies will be adopted in Advanced Control Rooms (ACRs) of advanced Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), which is thought to increase operators’ performance. However, potential human factors issues coupled with digital technologies might be troublesome. Human factors issues in ACRs are identified and strategies (or countermeasures) for evaluating and analyzing each of issues are addressed in this study.

 

Keywords: Nuclear Power Plant, human performance, Human error, advanced control room, human factor issues

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1089583

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1628

References:


[1] S. H. Chang, S. S. Choi, J. K. Park, G. Heo, H. G. Kim, "Development of an Advanced Human-machine Interface for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 64, pp. 109–126, 1999.
[2] I. S. Kim, Computerized Systems for On-line Management of Failures: a State-Of The-Art Discussion of Alarm Systems and Diagnostic Systems Applied in the Nuclear Industry,” Reliability Engineering and Safety System, Vol. 44, pp. 279–295, 1994.
[3] H. Yoahikawa, T. Nakagawa, Y. Nakatani, T. Furuta, A. Hasegawa, "Development of an Analysis Support System for Man-machine System Design Information. Control,” Eng. Practice, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 417–425, 1997.
[4] T. Ohi,H. Yoshikawa, M. Kitamura, K. Furuta,A. Gofuku, K. Itoh, W. Wei, Y. Ozaki, "Development of an Advanced Human-machine Interface System to Enhanced Operating Availability of Nuclear Power Plants,” International Symposium on the Future I&C for NPP (ISOFIC2002), Seoul: 297–300, 2002
[5] S. J. Cho et al., The Evaluation of Suitability for the Design of Soft Control and Safety Console for APR1400, KHNP, TR. A02NS04.S2003.EN8, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2003.
[6] H. Yoshikawa, "Human-machine interaction in nuclear power plants,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 151-158, 2005.
[7] S. J. Leeand P. H. Seong, "Development of an Integrated Design Support System to Aid Cognitive Activities of Operators,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 703-716, 2007.
[8] J. S. Ha, P.H Seong, M. S. Lee, J. H. Hong, "Development of Human Performance Measures for Human Factors Validation in the Advanced MCR of APR-1400, ” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 2687-2700, 2007.
[9] J. S. Ha, P. H. Seong, "HUPESS: Human Performance Evaluation Support System,” In P.H. Seong (Eds.), Reliability and Risk Issues in Large Scale Safety-critical Digital Control Systems, Springer-Verlag London Limited, pp. 197-229, 2009.
[10] J. S. Ha, P. H. Seong, "A Human-machine Interface Evaluation Method: A Difficulty Evaluation Method in Information Searching (DEMIS),” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 94, pp. 1557-1567, 2009.
[11] J. M. O’Hara, R. E. Hall, "Advanced Control Rooms and Crew Performance Issues: Implications for Human Reliability,” IEEE Trans. Nucl.Sci., Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 919–923, 1992.
[12] J. M. O’Hara, W. F. Stubler, J. C. Higgins, and W. S. Brown, Integrated System Validation: Methodology and Review Criteria, NUREG/CR-6393, US NRC, 1997.
[13] M. R. Endsley and D. J. Garland, Eds., Situation Awareness: Analysis and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001.
[14] D. H. Lee, H. C. Lee, "A Review on Measurement and Applications of Situation Awareness for an Evaluation of Korea Next Generation Reactor Operator Performance,” IE Interface, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 751–758, 2000.
[15] R. E. Nisbett, T. D.Wilson, "Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Process,” Psycholog. Rev., vol. 84, pp. 231–295, 1997.
[16] M. R. Endsley, T. G. O. Brien, S. G. Charlton, Eds., "Situation Awareness Measurement in Test and Evaluation,” in Handbook of Human Factors Testing and Evaluation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.
[17] M. R. Endsley, "Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems,” Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 65–84, 1995.
[18] G. F. Wilson, M. R. Endsley, D. J. Garland, Eds., "Strategies for Psychophysiological Assessment of Situation Awareness,” in Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
[19] R. Williges, W. W. Wierwille, "Behavioral Measures of Aircrew Mental Workload,” Human Factors, vol. 21, pp. 549–574, 1979.
[20] C. D. Wickens, J. G. Hollands, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.
[21] Y. Lin, W. J. Zhang, and L. G.Watson, "Using eye movement parameters for evaluating human-machine interface frameworks under normal control operation and fault detection situations,” Int. J. Human Computer Studies, vol. 59, pp. 837–873, 2003.
[22] J. A. Veltman and A. W. K. Gaillard, "Physiological indices of workload in a simulated flight task,” Biol. Psychol., vol. 42, pp. 323–342, 1996.
[23] L. O. Bauer, R. Goldstein, and J. A. Stern, "Effects of information-processing demands on physiological response patterns,” Human Factors, vol. 29, pp. 219–234, 1987.
[24] J. H. Goldberg and X. P. Kotval, "Eye movement-based evaluation of the computer interface,” in Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety, S. K. Kumar, Ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press,1998.
[25] C. H. Ha and P. H. Seong, "Investigation on Relationship between Information Flow Rate and Mental Workload of Accident Diagnosis Tasks in NPPs,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1450–1459, 2006.
[26] P. Ø. Braarud, G. Jr. Skraaning, "Insights from a Benchmark Integrated System Validation of a Modernized NPP Control Room: Performance Measurement and the Comparison to the Benchmark System,” in NPIC&HMIT 2006, Albuquerque, NM, Nov., pp. 12–16, 2006.