Dynamic Admission Control for Quality of Service in IP Networks
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Dynamic Admission Control for Quality of Service in IP Networks

Authors: J. Kasigwa, V. Baryamureeba, D. Williams

Abstract:

The goal of admission control is to support the Quality of Service demands of real-time applications via resource reservation in IP networks. In this paper we introduce a novel Dynamic Admission Control (DAC) mechanism for IP networks. The DAC dynamically allocates network resources using the previous network pattern for each path and uses the dynamic admission algorithm to improve bandwidth utilization using bandwidth brokers. We evaluate the performance of the proposed mechanism through trace-driven simulation experiments in view point of blocking probability, throughput and normalized utilization.

Keywords: Bandwidth broker, dynamic admission control(DAC), IP networks, quality of service, real-time flows.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1072002

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1247

References:


[1] Elek, V., Karlsson, G. and Ronngren, R. (2000). Admission Control Based on End-to-End Measurements. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM 2000, 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Stockholm Sweden, 2:622-630.
[2] Samir, C., and Jongbok, B. (2002). Quest for the end-to-end network QoS. Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1919-1925.
[3] Eleni, M., Charalampos, C., Panos, G., Danny, G. and Griffin, D. (2003). Admission Control for Providing QoS in DiffServ IP Networks. The TEQUILA Approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 38-44.
[4] Mei, Y., Yan, H., Jaime, K., Meejeong, L. Tatsuya, S. and Matsubara, D. (2004). An End-to-End QoS Framework with On-Demand Bandwidth Reconfiguration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 0-7803-8356- 7/04.
[5] L. Mathy, C. Edwards and D. Hutchison, The Internet: A Global Telecommunications Solution? IEEE Network Magazine, pp.46-57, July/August 2000.
[6] M. Albrecht, M. Kster, (2003). End-to-end QoS Management for Delaysensitive Scalable., The Proceedings of the 25 Annual Conf. on Local Computer Networks (LCN-03), Tampa, FL.
[7] A.Terzis, .The role of BB in Traffic Engineering. Proc. of ICNP-99, IEEE Computer Society. Sec 3.4.1.
[8] Z.-L.Zhang et al., On Scalable Design of Bandwidth Brokers, IEICE Trans. Commun., Vol.E84-B, No.8, pp.2011-2025, August 2001.
[9] Rhee, W.S, Lee, J., Yang, M., Kim, S. (2003). "Admission control mechanism using measurement based dynamic provisioning in differentiated service network," IEEE ICCS2003, Singapore.
[10] Rhee, W., Kim, H., Park, K., Kim, K., and Kim, S. (2001). Two Phase Edge-to-Edge Distributed Measurement Based Admission Control Mechanism in Large IP Networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE GLOBECOM 2001, 2571-2575.
[11] Zhiqun, Z., Xu, S., and Wei, D. (2004). MPLS ATCC. An Active Traffic and Congestion Control Mechanism in MPLS. In: Proceedings of the International Conferences on Infotech and Infonet (ICII2004, 5(3):234- 241.
[12] P. Bratley, B. Fox, and L. Schrage, A Guide to Simulation. New York: Springer-Verlag, second ed., 1987.