Influence of Combined Drill Coulters on Seedbed Compaction under Conservation Tillage Technologies

Authors: E. Šarauskis, L. Masilionyte, Z. Kriaučiūniene, K. Romaneckas

Abstract:

All over the world, including the Middle and East European countries, sustainable tillage and sowing technologies are applied increasingly broadly with a view to optimising soil resources, mitigating soil degradation processes, saving energy resources, preserving biological diversity, etc. As a result, altered conditions of tillage and sowing technological processes are faced inevitably. The purpose of this study is to determine the seedbed topsoil hardness when using a combined sowing coulter in different sustainable tillage technologies. The research involved a combined coulter consisting of two dissected blade discs and a shoe coulter. In order to determine soil hardness at the seedbed area, a multipenetrometer was used. It was found by experimental studies that in loosened soil, a combined sowing coulter equally suppresses the furrow bottom, walls and soil near the furrow; therefore, here, soil hardness was similar at all researched depths and no significant differences were established. In loosened and compacted (double-rolled) soil, the impact of a combined coulter on the hardness of seedbed soil surface was more considerable at a depth of 2 mm. Soil hardness at the furrow bottom and walls to a distance of up to 26 mm was 1.1 MPa. At a depth of 10 mm, the greatest hardness was established at the furrow bottom. In loosened and heavily compacted (rolled for 6 times) soil, at a depth of 2 and 10 mm a combined coulter most of all compacted the furrow bottom, which has a hardness of 1.8 MPa. At a depth of 20 mm, soil hardness within the whole investigated area varied insignificantly and fluctuated by around 2.0 MPa. The hardness of furrow walls and soil near the furrow was by approximately 1.0 MPa lower than that at the furrow bottom

Keywords: Coulters design, seedbed, soil hardness, combined coulters, soil compaction.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1071384

References:

[1] Arvidsson J., Westlin A., Sörensson F. Working depth in non-inversion tillage - Effects on soil physical properties and crop yield in Swedish field experiments. Soil & Tillage Research, 2013. 126, pp. 259-266.
[2] Arvidsson J., Bölenius E., and Cavalieri K. M. V. Effects of compaction during drilling on yield of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 2012. 39, pp. 44-51.
[3] Cavalieri K.M.V., Arvidsson J., Silva A.P., Keller T. Determination of precompression stress from uniaxial compression tests. Soil Tillage Research, 2008. 98, pp. 17-26.
[4] Feiza V., Feizien├À D., Au┼íkalnis A., Kadžien├À G. Sustainable tillage: results from long-term field experiments on Cambisol // Žemdirbyst├À=Agriculture, LŽI, LŽ┼¬U. - Akademija, 2010. Vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 3-14.
[5] Hou X., Wang X., Li R., Jia Z., Liang L., Wang J., Nie J., Chen X., and Wang Z. Effects of different manure application rates on soil properties, nutrient use, and crop yield during dryland maize farming. Soil Research, 2012. 50(6), pp. 507-514.
[6] McKenzie, Blair M. Spatial and temporal variability in soil physical conditions for root growth: interactions between soil, water and root growth for sustainable agriculture. Agrociencia, 2012.16.3: pp. 208-213.
[7] Mohammadi, K., Heidari, G., Khalesro, S., Sohrabi, Y. Soil management, microorganisms and organic matter interactions: A review. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2012. 10(86), pp. 19840-19849.
[8] Romaneckas K., Buragien├À S. Impact of conventional and sustainable soil tillage and sowing technologies on physical-mechanical soil properties. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 2009. 49(3), pp. 36-43.
[9] Romaneckas K., Pilipavičius V., Šarauskis E. Impact of seedbed density on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed germination, yield and quality of roots. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 2010. 8 (2), 599- 601.
[10] Romaneckas K., Romaneckien├À R., Pilipavi─ìius V., ┼áarauskis E. Effect of Sowing Depth and Seedbed Rolling on Sugar Beet, Zemdirbyste- Agriculture, 2009. Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 39-52.
[11] Šarauskis E., Vaiciukevicius E., Romaneckas K., Sakalauskas A., and Baranauskaite R. Economic and energetic evaluation of sustainable tillage and cereal sowing technologies in Lithuania. Rural Development 2009, Proceedings, 2009. 4 (1), pp. 280-285
[12] Satkus A., Velykis A. Modeling of seedbed creation for spring cereals in clayey soils. Agronomy research, 2008. 6, pp. 329-39.
[13] Slepetiene A., Liaudanskiene I., Slepetys J., Velykis A. The influence of reduced tillage, winter crops and ecologically managed long-term monoand multi-component swards on soil humic substances // Chemistry and Ecology. 2010. Vol. 26: 4, pp. 97-109.
[14] Tarakanovas P., Raudonius S. The program package "Selekcija" for processing statistical data. Akademija, Kedainiai, 2003. pp. 56 (in Lithuanian).