Preparing the Curve Number (CN) and Surface Runoff Coefficient (C) Map of the Basin in the Aghche Watershed, Iran
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33090
Preparing the Curve Number (CN) and Surface Runoff Coefficient (C) Map of the Basin in the Aghche Watershed, Iran

Authors: Ali Gholami, Ebrahim Panahpour, Amir Hossein Davami

Abstract:

In this research, a part of Aghche basin in Isfahan province with an area about 2000 hectars, was chosen to be obtain curve number coefficient runoff and W indicator in second Cook method By using aerial photos 1968 and 1995, the satellite data of the IRS in 2008. Then the process of land use changes in the period of study and its effect on the changes of curve number (CN), W indicator and surface runoff coefficient (C) of the basin was investigated. These results showed that on the track of these land use changes the weight averages curve number (CN), surface runoff coefficient (C) and W indicator of the basin were increased to 0.92, 0.02 and 0.78 unit in the first period of study and 1.18, 0.03, 0.99 Unit in the second period of study respectively.

Keywords: Aghche Watershed, Curve Numbers (CV), Land UseChanges, Surface Runoff Coefficient(C) Map, W indicator

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1329176

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2786

References:


[1] O. Symeonakis E., S. Koukoulas, A. Calvo, and E. Arnau, 2004.A land use change and land degradation study in Spain and Greece using Remote Sensing and GIS, proceeding of XXth International Society for Photogrammetric and Remote Sensing Congress, Istanbul, Turkey 12 - 23 July2004.
[2] Fohrer, N., S. Haverkamp, K. Eckhardt, and H. Frede, 2001. Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans & Atmosphere, 26: 577-582.
[3] Shrestha M. N., 2003. Spatially distributed hydrological modeling considering land-use change using remote sensing and GIS In The proceeding of 2003 Asia Map Conference, Nepal.
[4] Kochenderfer, J., N. Edwards, J. Pamela, and F. Wood, 1997. Hydrologic impacts of logging an Appalachian Watershed Using West Virginia's Best Management Practices, North Journal of applied forestry, 14(4):207-218.
[5] Melesse, A. M., W. D. Graham and J. D. Jordan, 2003. Spatially distributed watershed mapping and modeling: GIS based storm runoff response and hydrograph analysis: Part 2, Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 3 (2):2-28.
[6] Tan, C. H., A. M. Melesse and S.S. Yeh, 2002. Remote sensing and Geographic Information System in runoff coefficient estimation in China Taipe. Proceeding of Asian Association on Remote Sensing (AARS).
[7] Barati, S., S. Soltani Kupaee, S. J. Khajeh aldin, and B. Rayegani, 2010. The review of land use changes in Qalleh Shahrokh sub basin by using remote measuring techniques(period 1976 - 2003), Journal of Science and Agricultural Techniques and Natural Resources, 47: 349 - 365.
[8] Soil Conservation Service (SCS). National Engineering Handbook, Section 4 Hydrology. (US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC), 1985.
[9] McCuen, R. H., 1998. Hydrologic Analysis and Design. Prentice-Hall press. New Jersey
[10] United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, hydrology. Soil Conservation Service, US Government Printing Office, (Washington, DC), 1972.
[11] Mahdavi, M., 2003. Applied Hydrology. Tehran University Press.
[12] Ziaei, H. A., 2oo2. Principles of Watershed Management Engineering. Imam Reza University press.