Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Implementing an Intuitive Reasoner with a Large Weather Database

Authors: Yung-Chien Sun, O. Grant Clark

Abstract:

In this paper, the implementation of a rule-based intuitive reasoner is presented. The implementation included two parts: the rule induction module and the intuitive reasoner. A large weather database was acquired as the data source. Twelve weather variables from those data were chosen as the “target variables" whose values were predicted by the intuitive reasoner. A “complex" situation was simulated by making only subsets of the data available to the rule induction module. As a result, the rules induced were based on incomplete information with variable levels of certainty. The certainty level was modeled by a metric called "Strength of Belief", which was assigned to each rule or datum as ancillary information about the confidence in its accuracy. Two techniques were employed to induce rules from the data subsets: decision tree and multi-polynomial regression, respectively for the discrete and the continuous type of target variables. The intuitive reasoner was tested for its ability to use the induced rules to predict the classes of the discrete target variables and the values of the continuous target variables. The intuitive reasoner implemented two types of reasoning: fast and broad where, by analogy to human thought, the former corresponds to fast decision making and the latter to deeper contemplation. . For reference, a weather data analysis approach which had been applied on similar tasks was adopted to analyze the complete database and create predictive models for the same 12 target variables. The values predicted by the intuitive reasoner and the reference approach were compared with actual data. The intuitive reasoner reached near-100% accuracy for two continuous target variables. For the discrete target variables, the intuitive reasoner predicted at least 70% as accurately as the reference reasoner. Since the intuitive reasoner operated on rules derived from only about 10% of the total data, it demonstrated the potential advantages in dealing with sparse data sets as compared with conventional methods.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, intuition, knowledge acquisition, limited certainty.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1333464

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1043

References:


[1] R. M. Hogarth, Educating Intuition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2001.
[2] M. Gladwell, Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company, 2005.
[3] Y.-C. Sun and O. G. Clark, "A computational model of an intuitive reasoner for ecosystem control," unpublished.
[4] W. R. Burrows, "Combining classification and regression trees and the neuro-fuzzy inference system for environmental data modeling," in Proc. 18th International Conf. of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, New York, 1999.
[5] G. Latini and G. Passerini, Handling Missing Data: Applications to Environmental Analysis. Billerica, MA: Computational Mechanics Inc., 2004
[6] H. Liu, F. Hussain, C. L. Tan, and M. Dash. (2002). "Discretization: an enabling technique," Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 26, pp 393-423, 2002.
[7] L. Breiman, J. Friedman, C. J. Stone, and R. A. Olshen, Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International Group, 1984.
[8] G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran, Statistical Methods. Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press, 1967.
[9] J. P. Ignizio, Introduction to Expert System. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill, Inc., 1991
[10] K. Demirli, S. X. Cheng, and P. Muthukumaran, "Subtractive clustering based modeling of job sequencing with parametric search," Fuzzy Sets Systems, vol. 137, pp 235-270, 2003.
[11] D. Pedro, "Unifying instance-based and rule-based induction," Machine Learning, vol. 24, pp 141-168, 1996.
[12] E. H. Mamdani and S. Assilian, "An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller," International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, vol. 51, pp 135-147, 1999.
[13] W. Pedrycz, Fuzzy control and fuzzy systems (2nd, extended ed.). Taunton, UK: Research Studies Press Ltd., 1993.
[14] A. Loskiewicz-Buczak and R. E. Uhrig, "Information fusion by fuzzy set operation and genetic algorithms," Simulation, vol. 65, pp 52-66, 1995.
[15] L. A. Kurgan and K. J. Cios, "CAIM discretization algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 16, pp 145-153, 2004.
[16] S. L. Chiu, "A cluster estimation method with extension to fuzzy model identification," In Proc. of the 3rd IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, vol. 2, pp 1240-1245, 1994.
[17] S. Visa and A. Ralescu, "Issues in mining imbalanced data sets - a review paper," in Proc. of the 16th Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conf., Dayton, 2005.
[18] A. Estabrooks, T. Jo, and N. Japkowicz,. "A multiple resampling method for learning from imbalanced data sets," Computational Intelligence, vol. 20, pp 18-36, 2004.
[19] M. St├ñger, P. Lukowicz, and G. Tröster, "Dealing with class skew in context recognition," in Proc of the 26th IEEE International Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, Lisboa, Portugal, 2006.
[20] C. M. Ennett, M. Frize, and C. R. Walker, "Influence of missing values on artificial neural network performance," Medinfo. V. L. Patel, R. Rogers and R. Haux. London, UK: IOS Press, 2001.