Extracting Single Trial Visual Evoked Potentials using Selective Eigen-Rate Principal Components

Authors: Samraj Andrews, Ramaswamy Palaniappan, Nidal Kamel

Abstract:

In single trial analysis, when using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) signals, the selection of principal components (PCs) is an important issue. We propose a new method here that selects only the appropriate PCs. We denote the method as selective eigen-rate (SER). In the method, the VEP is reconstructed based on the rate of the eigen-values of the PCs. When this technique is applied on emulated VEP signals added with background electroencephalogram (EEG), with a focus on extracting the evoked P3 parameter, it is found to be feasible. The improvement in signal to noise ratio (SNR) is superior to two other existing methods of PC selection: Kaiser (KSR) and Residual Power (RP). Though another PC selection method, Spectral Power Ratio (SPR) gives a comparable SNR with high noise factors (i.e. EEGs), SER give more impressive results in such cases. Next, we applied SER method to real VEP signals to analyse the P3 responses for matched and non-matched stimuli. The P3 parameters extracted through our proposed SER method showed higher P3 response for matched stimulus, which confirms to the existing neuroscience knowledge. Single trial PCA using KSR and RP methods failed to indicate any difference for the stimuli.

Keywords: Electroencephalogram, P3, Single trial VEP.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1333322

References:

[1] Aunon, J.I., McGillem, C.D. and Childers, D.G., "Signal Processing in Event Potential Research: Averaging and Modelling," CRC Critical Review Bioengineering, vol. 5, pp. 323-367, 1981.
[2] Lange, D.H., and Inbar, G.F., "Variable Single-Trial Evoked Potential Estimation via Principal Component Identification," Proc. of IEEE EMBS International Conference, pp. 954-955, 1996.
[3] Andrews, S, Palaniappan, R., and Asirvadam, V.S., "Single Trial Source Separation of VEP Signals Using Selective Principal Components," Proc. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Medical Signal and Information Processing, pp. 51-57, 5-8 September 2004.
[4] Celka, P., Mesbah, M., Keir, M., Boashash, B., and Colditz, P., "Time-varying Dimension Analysis of EEG Using Principal Component Analysis and Model Selection", Proceedings of IEEE EMBS International Conference, pp. 1404-1407, 2000.
[5] Jolliffe, I.T., Principal Component Analysis, Springer-Verlag, 1986.
[6] Polich, J., "P300 in Clinical Applications: leaning, Method and Measurement," American Journal of EEG Technology, vol. 31, pp. 201-231, 1991.
[7] Snodgrass, J.G. and Vanderwart, M., "A Standardized Set of 260 Pictures: Norms for Name Agreement, Image Agreement, Familiarity, and Visual Complexity," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 174-215, 1980.
[8] Misulis, K.E., Spehlmann-s Evoked Potential Primer: Visual, Auditory and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Clinical Diagnosis, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994.
[9] Begleiter, H., Projesz, B., Reich, T., Edenberg, H.J., Goate, A., Blangero, J., Almasy, L., Foroud, T., Eerdewegh, P.V., Polich, J., Rohrbaugh, J., Kuperman, S., Bauer, L.O., O-Connor, S.J., Chorlian, D.B., Li, T.K., Conneally, P.M., Hesselbrock, V., Rice, J.P, Schuckit, M.A., Cloninger, R., Nurnberger Jr., J., Crowe, R. and Bloom, F.E., "Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis of Human Event-related Brain Potentials," Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 108, pp. 244-250, 1998.
[10] Bentin, S. and McCarthy, G., "The Effects of Immediate Stimulus Repetition on Reaction Time and Event-Related Potentials in Tasks of Different Complexity," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 130-149, 1994.