Effect of Personalization on Students' Achievement and Gender Factor in Mathematics Education
The aim of this study is to point out whether personalization of mathematical word problems could affect student achievement or not. The research was applied on two-grades students at spring semester 2008-2009. Before the treatment, students personal data were taken and given to the computer. During the treatment, paper-based personalized problems and paper-based non personalized problems were prepared by computer as the same problems and then these problems were given to students. At the end of the treatment, students- opinion was taken. As a result of this research, it was found out that there were no significant differences between learners through personalized or non-personalized materials, and also there were no significant differences between gender through personalized and non-personalized problems. However, opinion of students was highly positive through the personalized problems.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1333154Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1454
 J. M. Hart, "The Effect of Personalized Word Problems", Teaching Children Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 504- 505, 1996.
 P. G. Anand, and S. M. Ross, "Using Computer Assisted Instruction to Personalize Arithmetic Materials for Elementary School Children", Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 72-78, 1987.
 C. L. Lopez, and H. J. Sullivan, "Effects of Personalized Math Instruction for Hispanic Students", Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 16, no. 1, 95-100, 1991.
 C. L. Lopez, and H. J. Sullivan, "Effect of Personalization of Instructional Context on the Achievement and Attitudes of Hispanic Students", Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 40, no. 4, 5-13, 1992.
 H. Y. Ku, and H. J. Sullivan, "Personalization of Mathematics Word Problems in Taiwan", Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 49-59, 2000.
 H. Y. Ku, and H. J. Sullivan, "Student Performance and Attitudes Using Personalized Mathematics Instruction", Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 21-34, 2002.
 H. Y. Ku, C. Harter, P. L. Liu, Y. C. Cheng, and L. Yang, "The Effects of Using Personalized Computer-Based Instruction in Mathematics Learning". National Educational Computing Conference (NECC), New Orleans, LA, 2004.
 C. J, Chen, and P. L. Liu, "Personalized Computer-Assisted Mathematics Problem-Solving Program and Its Impact on Taiwanese Students", Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 105 -121, 2007.
 Ömer Çakır Balta, "The Effect of Personalized Mathematical Word Problems Usage on Students- Achievement in Computer and Classroom Based Environments" Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies, Program of Educational Technology, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey, 2008.
 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2005, April). NAEP 2003 Mathematical Report Card for the Nation and the States. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics /results2003.
 J. P. Wright, and C. D. Wright, "Personalized Verbal Problems: An Application of the Language Experience Approach", Journal of Educational Research, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 358-362, 1986.
 E. T. Bates, and L. R. Wiest, "Impact of Personalization of Mathematical Word Problems on Student Performance", The Mathematics Educator, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 17-26, 2004.
 E. Tatar, and Y. Soylu, "Okuma-Anlamadaki Ba┼ƒar─▒n─▒n Matematik Ba┼ƒar─▒s─▒na Etkisinin Belirlenmesi ├£zerine Bir ├çal─▒┼ƒma", Kastamonu E─ƒitim Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 503-508, 2006.
 R. E. Mayer, "Memory for algebra story problems", Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 199-216, 1982.
 İ. Karataş, and B. G├╝ven, ( 2004, December). 8. S─▒n─▒f ├û─ƒrencilerinin Problem ├çözme S├╝recince Kulland─▒─ƒ─▒ Bilgi T├╝rlerinin Analizi. Available: http://www.matder.org.tr.
 E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, and De Win, L. "Influence of Rewording Verbal Problems on Children-s Problem Representations and Solutions", Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 460-470, 1985.
 T. Bailey, "Taking the Problems out of Word Problems", Teaching Pre K-8, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 60-61, 2002.
 S. M. Ross, D. McCormick, N. Krisak, and P. G. Anand, "Personalizing Context in Teaching Mathematical Concepts: Teacher-Managed and Computer-Assisted Models", Educational Communication and Technology Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 169-178, 1985.
 Cordova, D. I. (2005, April) The Effects of Personalization and Choice on Students' Intrinsic Motivation and Learning, Unpublished PHD, Stanford University, 1993. Available http://www.positivepractices.com/ Personal/ PersonalizationAbstracts.html.
 J. Davis-Dorsey, S. M. Ross, and G. R. Morrison, "The Role of Rewording and Context Personalization in the Solving of Mathematical Word Problems", Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 61-68, 1991.
 S. M. Ross, and P. G. Anand, "A Computer-Based Strategy for Personalizing Verbal Problems in Teaching Mathematics", Educational Communications and Technology Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 151-162, 1987.
 J. N. Herndon, "Achievement and continuing motivation under differing levels of personalized instruction", Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University, USA, 1988.
 Ö. Çakır Balta, N. ┼×im┼ƒek, and N. Tezcan, "A Web Based Generation System for Personalization of E-Learning Materials". WCSET 2009: World Congress on Science, Engineering and Technology. Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2009, pp. 419-422.
 A. Yildirim, and H. Simsek, Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arast─▒rma Yontemleri.
[Qualitative Methods in Social Sciences] (3rd edition). Ankara: Seckin Yay─▒nc─▒l─▒k. 2003.