Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30172
Maintenance Function's Performance Evaluation Using Adapted Balanced Scorecard Model

Authors: A. Bakhtiar, B. Purwanggono, N. Metasari

Abstract:

PT XYZ is a bottled drinking water company. To preserve production resources owned by the company so that the resources could be utilized well, it has implemented maintenance management system, which has important role in company's profitability, and is one of the factors influenced overall company's performance. Yet, up to now the company has never measured maintenance activities' contribution to company's performance. Performance evaluation is done according to adapted Balanced Scorecard model fitted to maintenance function context. This model includes six perspectives: innovation and growth, production, maintenance, environment, costumer, and finance. Actual performance measurement is done through Analytic Hierarchy Process and Objective Matrix. From the research done, we can conclude that the company's maintenance function is categorized in moderate performance. But, there are some indicators which has high priority but low performance, which are: costumers' complain rate, work lateness rate, and Return on Investment.

Keywords: Maintenance, performance, balanced scorecard, objective matrix.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1059885

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2262

References:


[1] I. Alsyouf, "Measuring Maintenance Performance Using A Balanced Scorecard Approach," Journal of Quality in Maintenance Eng., vol.12 no 2 pp. 133-149. 2006.
[2] S. Blumenberg, "Benchmarking Financial Processes with Data Envelopment Analysis," International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management.
[3] A. Charnes, et.al, "A Developmental Study of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units in The U.S. Air Forces," Research Report CCS 460. Texas: Center for Cybernetic Studies University of Texas. 1984
[4] A.S. Corder, Maintenance Management Techniques, New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1988.
[5] K. Dervitsiotis. 1981. Operational Managements. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
[6] I.R Ferdian and R.N. Purwatoro. 2006. Pengukuran Kinerja Bank Syariah: Integrasi Pendekatan DEA dengan Analisis Rasio Keuangan. Usahawan No. 10 Tahun XXXV.
[7] A. Garg, and S.G. Deshmukh. 2006. Maintenance management: literature review and directions. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. Vol. 12 No. 3, 2006 pp. 205-238.
[8] V. Gasperz, 1998. Manajemen Produktivitas Total: Strategi Peningkatan Produktivitas Bisnis Total. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[9] V. Gasperz, 2003. Sistem Manajemen Kinerja Terintegrasi: Balanced Scorecard dengan Six Sigma untuk Organisasi Bisnis dan Pemerintah. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[10] K.S. Ghebrit, 2004. Productivity Measurement, Dissertation of Pretoria University.
[11] K.M.A Al Harbi, 2000. Optimization of Staff Numbers in The Process Industries: An Application of DEA. International Journal of Manpower. Vol 21 no 1 pp 47-59.
[12] A. Parida, 2003. Development of Multi-criteria Hierarchical Framework for Maintenance Performance Measurement: Concepts, Issues and Challenges. Doctoral Thesis of Luleå University of Technology.
[13] N.M. Paz and W. Leigh. 1993. Maintenance Scheduling: Issues, Results, and Research Needs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Vol. 14 No. 8, 1994, pp. 47-69.
[14] J. Riggs, J and G. Felix. 1983. Productivity Measurement by Objectives. National Productivity Review.
[15] T.L. Saaty, 1994. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill Company.
[16] R. Simons and A. Davila, 2000. Performance Measurement & Control System for Implementing Strategy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[17] E. Siswadi and R.N. Purwatoro, Paradigma Baru Pengukuran Efisiensi Kinerja Relatif Berbasis Pendekatan Matematik. Usahawan No.6 Tahun XXXIV. 2005.
[18] Steering Committee for Review of Commonwealth/State Sevice Provision. 1997. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Technique for Measuring the Efficiency of Government Service Delivery. Canberra: AGPS.
[19] D.J. Sumanth, 1984. Productivity Engineering and Management. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
[20] Sutarman and W. Katon. 2003. Perencanaan Kebutuhan Dan Pengadaan Material Pesawat Telepon Tipe Pte 991 N-3. Jurnal Teknik Industri Vol 5 No.4 Universitas Pasundan.
[21] A.H.C. Tsang, “Measuring Maintenance Performance: A Holistic Approach.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Vol. 19 no 7 pp. 691-715. 1999.
[22] T. Wireman, Developing Performance Indicators for Managing Maintenance. New York: Industrial Press Inc., 2005.