Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33093
Effect of Lime on the California Bearing Ratio Behaviour of Fly Ash - mine Overburden Mixes
Authors: B. Behera, M. K. Mishra
Abstract:
Typically thermal power plants are located near to surface coal mines that produce huge amount of fly ash as a waste byproduct. Disposal of fly ash causes significant economic and environmental problems. Now-a-days, research is going on for bulk utilization of fly ash. In order to increase its percentage utilization, an investigation was carried out to evaluate its potential for haul road construction. This paper presents the laboratory California bearing ratio (CBR) tests and evaluates the effect of lime on CBR behavior of fly ash - mine overburden mixes. Tests were performed with different percentages of lime (2%, 3%, 6%, and 9%). The results show that the increase in bearing ratio of fly ash-overburden mixes was achieved by lime treatment. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were conducted on 28 days cured specimens. The SEM study showed that the bearing ratio development is related to the microstructural development.Keywords: California bearing ratio, Fly ash, Mine overburden, Lime.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1332302
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1628References:
[1] M. Ahmaruzzaman, "A review on the utilization of fly ash," Progress in Energy and Combustion Science J., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 327-363, Jun. 2010.
[2] N. S. Pandian, A. Sridharan and S. Srinivas, "Angle of internal friction for pond ashes," Testing and evaluation J., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 443-454, Nov. 2000.
[3] F. G. Bell, "Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils," Engineering Geology J., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 223-237, Jul. 1996.
[4] N. C. Consoli, P. D. M. Prietto, J. A. H. Carraro and K. S. Heineck, "Behavior of compacted soil-fly ash-carbide lime mixtures," ASCE J. Geotech. and Geoenviron. Engg., vol. 127, no. 7, pp. 774-782, Sept. 2001.
[5] H. A. Acosta, T. B. Edil and C. H. Benson, "Soil stabilization and drying using fly ash," Geo Engineering Report No. 03-03, Geo Engineering Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA, Jan. 2003.
[6] S. O. Faluyi and O. O. Amu, "Effects of Lime Stabilization on the pH Values of Lateritic Soils in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria," Applied Sciences J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 192-194, 2005.
[7] G. Rajasekaran, "Sulphate attack and ettringite formation in the lime and cement stabilized marine clays," Ocean Engineering J., vol. 32, no. 8-9, pp. 1133-1159, Jun. 2005.
[8] R. K. Goswami and C. Mahanta, "Leaching characteristics of residual lateritic soils stabilised with fly ash and lime for geotechnical applications", Waste Management J., vol. 27, no. 4, pp 466-481, 2007.
[9] A. Ghosh and U. Dey, "Bearing ratio of reinforced fly ash overlying soft soil and deformation modulus of fly ash," Geotextiles and Geomembranes J., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 313-320, Aug. 2009.
[10] R. Mackos, T. Butalia, W. Wolfe and H. W. Walker, "Use of limeactivated class F fly ash in the full depth reclamation of asphalt pavements: environmental aspects," Proceedings of World of Coal Ash Conference -09, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, paper no 121, May 2009.
[11] R. Ulusay, F. Arlkan, M. F. Yoleri and D. Caglan, "Engineering geological characterization of coal mine waste material and an evaluation in the context of back-analysis of spoil pile instabilities in a strip mine, SW Turkey," Engineering Geology J., vol. 40, no. 1-2, pp. 77-101, Nov. 1995.
[12] IS: 2720 Part 8, "Laboratory determination of water content - dry density relation using heavy compaction", Indian Standard methods of test for soils, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, pp. 1-9, 1983.
[13] IS: 2720 Part 16, "Laboratory determination of CBR", Indian Standard methods of test for soils, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, pp. 1- 15, 1987.
[14] B. Cetina, A. H. Aydilekb and Y. Guneyc, "Stabilization of recycled base materials with high carbon fly ash," Resources, Conservation and Recycling J., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 878-892, Sept. 2010.