Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
FEA for Teeth Preparations Marginal Geometry

Authors: L. Sandu, F. Topalâ, S. Porojan

Abstract:

Knowledge of factors, which influence stress and its distribution, is of key importance to the successful production of durable restorations. One of this is the marginal geometry. The objective of this study was to evaluate, by finite element analysis (FEA), the influence of different marginal designs on the stress distribution in teeth prepared for cast metal crowns. Five margin designs were taken into consideration: shoulderless, chamfer, shoulder, sloped shoulder and shoulder with bevel. For each kind of preparation three dimensional finite element analyses were initiated. Maximal equivalent stresses were calculated and stress patterns were represented in order to compare the marginal designs. Within the limitation of this study, the shoulder and beveled shoulder margin preparations of the teeth are preferred for cast metal crowns from biomechanical point of view.

Keywords: finite element, marginal geometry, metal crown

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1331789

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1709

References:


[1] S. Rosenstiel, M. Land, J. Fujimoto, Contemporary fixed prosthodontics, 3rd ed. Mosby, St. Louis, 2001.
[2] P.L. Tan, D.G. Gratton, A.M. Diaz-Arnold, D.C. Holmes, "An In Vitro Comparison of Vertical Marginal Gaps of CAD/CAM Titanium and Conventional Cast Restorations", J Prosthodons, 2008 (17): 378-83.
[3] A.B. Olivera, T. Saito, "The Effect of Die Spacer on Retention and Fitting of Complete Cast Crowns", J Prosthodont 2006;15:243-9.
[4] A. Bindl, W.H. Mormann, "Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations", J Oral Rehabil, 2005 Jun;32(6):441-7.
[5] M. F. Ayad, "Effects of Tooth Preparation Burs and Luting Cement Types on the Marginal Fit of Extracoronal Restorations", J Prosthodont, 2009, 18:145-51.
[6] E.A. Tsitrou, R. van Noort, "Minimal preparation designs for single posterior indirect prostheses with the use of the Cerec system", Int J Comput Dent, 2008;11(3-4):227-40.
[7] F. Beuer, H. Aggstaller, D. Edelhoff, W. Gernet, "Effect of Preparation Design on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Crown Copings", Dent Mater J 2008; 27(3): 362´╝ì7.
[8] P. Kohorst, H. Brinkmann, J. Li, L. Borchers, M. Stiesch, "Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems", Eur J Oral Sci, 2009;117(3):319-25.
[9] N. De Jager, P. Pallav, A.J. Feilzer, "The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced allceramic dental crowns", Dent Mater, 2005,21(3):242-51.
[10] A. Shinya, L.V. Lassila, P.K. Vallittu, A. Shinya, "Three-dimensional finite element analysis of posterior fiber reinforced composite fixed partial denture: framework design for pontic", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2009;17(2):78-84.
[11] E.A. Tsitrou, M. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, R. van Noort, "A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns", J Dent, 2010;38(1):16-22.