Towards External Varieties to Internal Varieties − Modular Perspective

Authors: AHM Shamsuzzoha, Tauno Kekäle, Petri Helo

Abstract:

Product customization is an essential requirement for manufacturing firms to achieve higher customers- satisfaction and fulfill business target. In order to achieve these objectives, firms need to handle both external varieties such as customer preference, government regulations, cultural considerations etc and internal varieties such as functional requirements of product, production efficiency, quality etc. Both of the varieties need to be accumulated and integrated together for the purpose of producing customized product. These varieties are presented and discussed in this paper along with the perspectives of modular product design and development process. Other development strategies such as modularity, component commonality, product family design and product platform are presented with a view to achieve product variety quickly and economically. A case example both for the concept of modular design and platform based product development process is also presented with the help of design structure matrix (DSM) tool. This paper is concluded with several managerial implications and future research direction.

Keywords: Customization modular design, platform development, product variety.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1331315

References:

[1] K. Grieve, and E. Ortiz, "Customer value management sins can be costly," DM Review, vol. 13, no.11, pp.38-40, 2003.
[2] L. Fuld, "Be prepared", Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no.11, pp.20- 21, 2003.
[3] C.P. Blocker, and D.J. Flint, "Exploring the dynamics of customer value in cross-cultural business relationships," Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 249-259, 2007.
[4] T. Blecker, G. Friedrich, B. Kaluza, N. Abdelkafi, and G. Kreutler, "Integrated series in information systems," in Information and Management Systems for Product Customization, Part III, Springer publisher, US, 2005, pp. 243-248.
[5] M.A. Schilling, and K. Steensma, "The use of modular organizational forms: an industry level analysis," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1149-1169, 2001.
[6] P.J. Newcomb, B.Bras, and D.W. Rosen, "Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle," in Proc. ASME design engineering technical conferences, DETC96/DTM-1516, Irvine, CA, 1996.
[7] K. Ulrich, "The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm," Research Policy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 419-440, 1995.
[8] J. Jiao, T.W. Simpson, and Z. Siddique, "Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 5-29, 2007.
[9] T. Lehtonen, "Designing modular product architecture in the new product development," Doctoral Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, 2007.
[10] D.V. Steward, System Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design, Petrocelli Books Inc., New York, 1981.
[11] D.V. Steward, "Partitioning and tearing systems of equations," SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, Series B, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 345-365, 1965.
[12] T. Blecker, and N. Abdelkafi,"Complexity and variety in mass customization systems: analysis and recommendations," Management Science, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 908-929, 2006.
[13] D. Anderson, Build-to-Order and Mass Customization: The Ultimate Supply Chain Management and Lean Manufacturing Strategy for Low- Cost On-Demand Production without Forecasts or Inventory, CIM Press, Cambria, CA, 2004.
[14] J. Efstathiou, and T. Zhang, "Future direction on mass customization research and practices: a research agenda," in: Charu Chandra / Ali Kamrani (Eds.): Mass Customization - A Supply Chain Approach, New York et al.: Kluwer Academic, 2004, pp. 237-259.
[15] D. Robertson, and K. Ulrich, "Planning product platforms," Sloan Management Review, vol. 39, no. 4, pp.19-31, 1998.
[16] M.S. Sawhney, "Leveraged high-variety strategies: from portfolio thinking to platform thinking," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 54-61, 1998.