Detecting Interactions between Behavioral Requirements with OWL and SWRL
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Detecting Interactions between Behavioral Requirements with OWL and SWRL

Authors: Haibo Hu, Dan Yang, Chunxiao Ye, Chunlei Fu, Ren Li

Abstract:

High quality requirements analysis is one of the most crucial activities to ensure the success of a software project, so that requirements verification for software system becomes more and more important in Requirements Engineering (RE) and it is one of the most helpful strategies for improving the quality of software system. Related works show that requirement elicitation and analysis can be facilitated by ontological approaches and semantic web technologies. In this paper, we proposed a hybrid method which aims to verify requirements with structural and formal semantics to detect interactions. The proposed method is twofold: one is for modeling requirements with the semantic web language OWL, to construct a semantic context; the other is a set of interaction detection rules which are derived from scenario-based analysis and represented with semantic web rule language (SWRL). SWRL based rules are working with rule engines like Jess to reason in semantic context for requirements thus to detect interactions. The benefits of the proposed method lie in three aspects: the method (i) provides systematic steps for modeling requirements with an ontological approach, (ii) offers synergy of requirements elicitation and domain engineering for knowledge sharing, and (3)the proposed rules can systematically assist in requirements interaction detection.

Keywords: Requirements Engineering, Semantic Web, OWL, Requirements Interaction Detection, SWRL.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1057453

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1802

References:


[1] A. Nhlabatsi, R. Laney, and B. Nuseibeh, "Feature interaction: The security threat from within software systems," Progress in Informatics, no. 5, pp. 75-90, 2008.
[2] R. G. Crespo, "Identification of feature denial of services," in 2nd International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services, and Technologies, NGMAST 2008, September 16-19, 2008, pp. 571-575, 2008.
[3] W. Pree, "Component-based software development - a new paradigm in software engineering?," in Proceedings of the 1997 Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference and International Computer Science Conference, APSEC'97 and ICSC'97, December 2-5, 1997, pp. 523-524, 1997.
[4] S. Apel and C. Kästner, "An Overview of Feature-Oriented Software Development," Journal of Object Technology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 49-84, Aug. 2009.
[5] T. Elrad, R. E. Filman, and A. Bader, "Aspect-oriented programming," Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 29-32, 2001.
[6] G. A. Lewis, E. Morris, S. Simanta, and L. Wrage, "Effects of Service-Oriented Architecture on software development lifecycle activities," Software Process Improvement and Practice, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 135-144, 2008.
[7] I. Sommerville, "Integrated requirements engineering: A tutorial," IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 16-23, 2005.
[8] V. Gervasi and D. Zowghi, "Reasoning about inconsistencies in natural language requirements," ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 277-330, 2005.
[9] W. N. Robinson, S. D. Pawlowski, and V. Volkov, "Requirements Interaction Management," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 132-190, Jun. 2003.
[10] A. Nhlabatsi, "Initialisation Problems in Feature Composition," PhD thesis, The Open University, 2009.
[11] M. Shehata, A. Eberlein, and A. Fapojuwo, "A taxonomy for identifying requirement interactions in software systems," Computer Networks, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 398-425, Feb. 2007.
[12] A. Classen, P. Heymans, and P. Schobbens, "What's in a Feature: A Requirements Engineering Perspective," in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, vol. 4961, pp. 16-30, 2008.
[13] M. Heisel and J. Souquières, "A Heuristic Approach to Detect Feature Interactions in Requirements," in Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems V, pp. 165-171, 1998.
[14] E. Sarmiento, M. R. S. Borges, and M. L. M. Campos, "Applying an event-based approach for detecting requirements interaction," in ICEIS 2009 - 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, May 6-10, 2009, pp. 225-230, 2009.
[15] M. Shehata, "Detecting Requirements Interactions Using Semi-Formal Methods," PhD thesis, University of Calgary, 2005.
[16] R. Laney, T. T. Tun, M. Jackson, and B. Nuseibeh, "Composing Features by Managing Inconsistent Requirements," in Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems IX, pp. 129-144, 2007.
[17] C. Liu, "Ontology-based requirements conflicts analysis in activity diagrams," in International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, ICCSA 2009, June 29-July 2, 2009, LNCS, vol. 5593, pp. 1-12, 2009.
[18] O. Lassila and R. R. Swick, "Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification."
[Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/.
[Accessed: 02-Oct-2010].
[19] S. Bechhofer et al., "OWL Web Ontology Language Reference."
[Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
[Accessed: 07-Oct-2010].
[20] F. Baader et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[21] I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean, "SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML."
[Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.
[Accessed: 07-Oct-2010].
[22] H. Boley, S.Tabet, and G.Wagner, "Design rationale of RuleML: a markup language for Semantic Web rules". Proc. Semantic Web Working Symp, California, USA, Aug. 2001, pp. 381-401, 2001.
[23] N. Noy, M. Sintek, S. Decker, M. Crubezy, R. Fergerson, and M. Musen, "Creating semantic web contents with protege-2000," IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 60-71, 2001.
[24] E. Wang and Y. S. Kim, "A teaching strategies engine using translation from SWRL to Jess," in 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2006, June 26-30, 2006, LNCS vol. 4053, pp. 51-60, 2006.
[25] M. Shehata, A. Eberlein, and A. Fapojuwo, "Using semi-formal methods for detecting interactions among smart homes policies," Science of Compter Programming, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 125-161, Jul. 2007.