Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30371
Teager-Huang Analysis Applied to Sonar Target Recognition

Authors: J.-C. Cexus, A.O. Boudraa

Abstract:

In this paper, a new approach for target recognition based on the Empirical mode decomposition (EMD) algorithm of Huang etal. [11] and the energy tracking operator of Teager [13]-[14] is introduced. The conjunction of these two methods is called Teager-Huang analysis. This approach is well suited for nonstationary signals analysis. The impulse response (IR) of target is first band pass filtered into subsignals (components) called Intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) with well defined Instantaneous frequency (IF) and Instantaneous amplitude (IA). Each IMF is a zero-mean AM-FM component. In second step, the energy of each IMF is tracked using the Teager energy operator (TEO). IF and IA, useful to describe the time-varying characteristics of the signal, are estimated using the Energy separation algorithm (ESA) algorithm of Maragos et al .[16]-[17]. In third step, a set of features such as skewness and kurtosis are extracted from the IF, IA and IMF energy functions. The Teager-Huang analysis is tested on set of synthetic IRs of Sonar targets with different physical characteristics (density, velocity, shape,? ). PCA is first applied to features to discriminate between manufactured and natural targets. The manufactured patterns are classified into spheres and cylinders. One hundred percent of correct recognition is achieved with twenty three echoes where sixteen IRs, used for training, are free noise and seven IRs, used for testing phase, are corrupted with white Gaussian noise.

Keywords: Target Recognition, features extraction, empirical mode decomposition, Teager-Kaiser energy operator

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1057305

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1893

References:


[1] J.F. Hoffman, "Classification of spherical targets using likelihood and quadrature components," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 49, pp. 23-30, 1971.
[2] P.C. Chesnut, and R.W. Floyd, "An aspect independent sonar targetrecognition method," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 70, pp. 727-734, 1981.
[3] H.L. Roitblat, P.W. Moore, P.E. Nachtigall, R.H. Penner, and W.W.L.Au, "Natural echolocation with an artificial neural network," Int. J. Neural Networks, vol. 1, pp. 707-716, 1989.
[4] W.W.L. Au, "Comparison of sonar discrimination: Dolphin and artificialneural network," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 95, pp. 2728-2735, 1994
[5] F. Magand and, P. Chevret, "Time-frequency analysis of energydistribution for circumferential waves on cylindrical elastic shells," Acta Acust. vol. 82, pp. 707-716, 1996.
[6] D.M. Drumheller, D.H. Hughes, B.T. O'Connor and, C.F. Gaumond,"Identification and synthesis of acoustic scattering components via the wavelet transform," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 97, pp. 3649-3656, 1995
[7] P. Chevret, F. Magand and, L. Besacier, "Time-frequency analysis ofcircumferential wave energy distribution for spherical shells. Application to sonar recognition," Appl. Sig. Process., vol. 3, pp. 136-142, 1996.
[8] B. Boashash, "Time-Frequency Signal Analysis -Methods&Applications", Longman-Cheshire, Melbourne and John Wiley Halsted Press, New York, total pages 547, 1992.
[9] P. Chevet, N. Gache, and V. Zimpfer, "Time-frequency filters for target classification", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1829-1837, 1999.
[10] F. Hlawatsch, and W. Kozek, "Time-frequency projection filters and time-frequency signal expansions," IEEE Trans. Sig. Process., vol. 42, pp. 3321-3334, 1994.
[11] N. Huang et al., "The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis," Proc.Royal Society London A, vol. 454, pp. 903-995, 1998.
[12] R.R. Goodman, and R. Stern, ''Reflection and transmission of sound by elastic spherical shells,'' J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 338-344,1962.
[13] P. Flandrin, G. Rilling and, P. Gonçalves, "EMD as a filter bank," IEEESig. Process. Lett., vol. 11, no;. 2, pp. 112-114, 2003.
[14] H.M. Teager, and S.M. Teager, "Evidence for nonlinear sound production mechanisms in the vocal tract," vol. 55 of D, pp. 241-261,France: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1990.
[15] J.F. Kaiser, "On simple algorithm to calculate the 'energy' of signal," IEEE Proc. ICCASP, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 381-384, 1990
[16] P. Maragos, J.F. Kaiser, and T.F. Quatieri, "On amplitude and frequency demodulation using energy operators," IEEE Trans. Sig. Process., vol. 41, pp. 1532-1550, 1993.
[17] P. Maragos, J.F. Kaiser and, T.F. Quatieri, "On separating amplitude from frequency modulations using energy operators," Proc. ICASSP.,vol. 2, pp. 1-4, 1992.
[18] P. Maragos, J.F. Kaiser, and T.F. Quatieri, "Energy separation in signal modulation to speech analysis," IEEE Trans. Sig. Process., vol. 41, pp. 3024-3051, 1993.
[19] A. Potamianos and, P. Maragos, "A comparison of the energy operator and Hilbert transform approach to signal and speech demodulation," Sig.Proc., vol. 37, pp. 95-120, 1994.
[20] A.C. Bovik, P. Maragos, and T.F. Quatieri, "AM-FM energy detection and separation in noise using multiband energy operators," IEEE Trans.Sgi. Process., vol. 41, pp. 3245-3265, 1993.
[21] H.M. Teager and, S.M. Teager, "Evidence for nonlinear speech production mechanisms in the vocal tract," in Proc. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Speech Production and Speech Modeling, Bonas, France, July, pp. 214-261, 1989.
[22] A.O. Boudraa, J.C. Cexus, F. Salzenstein and L. Guillon, "IF estimationusing EMD and nonlinear Teager energy operator," Proc. of First Int.Symp. Control, Commun. and Sig. Process., Tunisia, pp. 45-48, 2004.
[23] F. Magand, "Reconnaissance de cibles par Sonar actif large bande. Application a des coques de forme simple et a la classification des especes de poissons de mer," PhD Thesis, ICPI Lyon, France 1996.