Biomethanation of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) by Membrane Anaerobic System (MAS) using POME as a Substrate

Authors: N.H. Abdurahman, Y. M. Rosli, N. H. Azhari, S. F. Tam

Abstract:

The direct discharge of palm oil mill effluent (POME) wastewater causes serious environmental pollution due to its high chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). Traditional ways for POME treatment have both economical and environmental disadvantages. In this study, a membrane anaerobic system (MAS) was used as an alternative, cost effective method for treating POME. Six steady states were attained as a part of a kinetic study that considered concentration ranges of 8,220 to 15,400 mg/l for mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and 6,329 to 13,244 mg/l for mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS). Kinetic equations from Monod, Contois and Chen & Hashimoto were employed to describe the kinetics of POME treatment at organic loading rates ranging from 2 to 13 kg COD/m3/d. throughout the experiment, the removal efficiency of COD was from 94.8 to 96.5% with hydraulic retention time, HRT from 400.6 to 5.7 days. The growth yield coefficient, Y was found to be 0.62gVSS/g COD the specific microorganism decay rate was 0.21 d-1 and the methane gas yield production rate was between 0.25 l/g COD/d and 0.58 l/g COD/d. Steady state influent COD concentrations increased from 18,302 mg/l in the first steady state to 43,500 mg/l in the sixth steady state. The minimum solids retention time, which was obtained from the three kinetic models ranged from 5 to 12.3 days. The k values were in the range of 0.35 – 0.519 g COD/ g VSS • d and values were between 0.26 and 0.379 d-1. The solids retention time (SRT) decreased from 800 days to 11.6 days. The complete treatment reduced the COD content to 2279 mg/l equivalent to a reduction of 94.8% reduction from the original.

Keywords: COD reduction, POME, kinetics, membrane, anaerobic, monod, contois equation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1056943

References:

[1] A.N. Ma; HA. Halim. Management of palm oil industrial wastes in Malaysia. Malaysia: Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia (PORIM)- Ministry of Primary Industries. (1988)
[2] C. Polprasert. Organic waste recycling. (1989). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[3] G. Singh.; LK, Huan; T, Leng; Kow DL. Oil palm and the environment. (1999). SDN. Bhd, Kuala Lumpur: Sp-nuda Printing.
[4] Anon. Biogas plants treating palm oil mill effluent in Malaysia. (1995). Rapa: Rural Energy.
[5] J. H.Tay. Complete reclamation of palm oil wastes. Resources conservation and Recycling 5, (1991): 383-392.
[6] A.B. Idris, and A. Al-Mamun. Effect of scale on the performance of anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) treating palm oil mill effluent, Proc. Fourth International Symposum on Waste Management Problems in Agro-Industry, Istanbul, Turkey (1998): pp. 206-211.
[7] Ma,A.N., S.C.Cheah; M.C.Chow. Current status of palm oil mill processing wastes management. In: Waste Management in Malaysia: Current status and prospects for bioremediation (1993): Pp.111-136.
[8] A.N. Ma. Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Regional Workshop on Anaerobic Treatment Technology of Wastewater from Agro-Industry. May (1990). P. 95-105.
[9] C.Chiemchaisri; Y.K. Wong. and Yamamoto, K. Organic stabilization and nitrogen removal in membrane separation bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. (1992). Wat. Sci. Tech., 25(10): 231-240.
[10] V.L. Pillay; B. Townsend; and Buckley, C.A. Improving the performance of anaerobic digesters at wastewater treatment; works: the coupled cross-flow microfiltration/digester process. Wat. Sci. Tech., (1994). 30(12): 329-337.
[11] A. Fakhru-l-Razi, Ultrafiltration membrane separation for anaerobic wastewater treatment. (1994). Wat. Sci. Tech. 30(12):321-327.
[12] W.R. Ross; J.P. Bannard;, K. Strohwald; C.J. Grobler, and J. Sanetra. Practical application of the ADUF process to the full-scale treatment of a maize-processing effluent. (1992). Wat. Sci. Tech. 25(10): 27-39.
[13] K. Strohwald; and W.R. Ross. Application of the ADUF process to brewery effluent on a laboratory scale. (1992). Wat. Sci. Tech. 25(10):95-105.
[14] A. Nagano; E. Arikawa, and H. Kobayashi. The treatment of liquor wastewater containing high-strength suspended solids by membrane bioreactor system. (1992). Wat. Sci. Tech. 26 (3-4): 887-895.
[15] J. Monod. Growth of bacteria cultures. Annu Rev Microbial. (1949): 3, 371-394.
[16] Y. R. Chen., A.G Hashimoto. Substrate Utilization Kinetic Model for Biological Treatment Processes, Biotechnol.Bioeng. (1980): 22, 2081- 2095.
[17] DE. Contois. Kinetics of bacteria growth: relationship between population density and space growth rate of continuous cultures. J. Gen Microbiol (1959): 21, 40-50.
[18] R. Borja-Padilla; and C.J. Banks. Thermophilic semi-continuous anaerobic treatment of POME. (1993). Biotechnology Letters, 15(7): 761-766.
[19] Ng. W. J., K, K. Wong; and K. K. Chin. Two-phase anaerobic treatment kinetics of palm oil wastes. (1985).Wa. Sci. Tech., 19(5): 667-669.
[20] B.A.Idris. and A. Al-Mamun. Effect of scale on the performance of anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) treating palm Oil mill effluent, Proc. Fourth International Symposium on Waste Management Problems in Agro-Industry, (1998). Istanbul, Turkey: 206-211.
[21] A. Fakhru-l-Razi. and M. J.M. M. Noor, Treatment of palm oil effluent (POME) with the membrane anaerobic system (MAS). (1999). Wat. Sci. Tech. 39(10-11): 159-163.
[22] A. G. Abdullah; Liew, Idris. A., Ahmadun. F.R., Baharin, B. S., Emby, F., Noor, M. J. Megat., Mohd., Nour.A.H. A Kinetic study of a membrane anaerobic reactor (MAR) for treatment of sewage sludge. (2005). Desalination 183, 439-445.
[23] A. A. L. Zinatizadeh,; A. R. Mohamed; G. D. Najafpour. Kinetic evaluation of palm oil mill effluent digestion in a high rate up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor. Process Biochemistry Journal (2006): 41, 1038-1046.
[24] C. P.L. Grady.; H. C. Lim. Biological Wastewater Treatment: Theory and Applications. New York. (1980). Macel Dekker Inc. pp. 220-222, 870-876.