Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31097
A Study of Relationship between WBGT and Relative Humidity to Worker Performance

Authors: A.R. Ismail, M. R. A. Rani, Z. K. M. Makhbul, M. J. M. Nor, M. N. A. Rahman


The environmental factors such as temperature and relative humidity are very contribute to the effect of comfort, health, performance and worker productivity. To ensure an ergonomics work environment, it is possible to require a specific attention especially in industries. The aim of this study is to show the effect of temperature and relative humidity on worker productivity in automotive industry by taking a workstation in an automotive plant as the location to conduct the study. From the analysis of the data, there were relationship between temperature and relative humidity on worker productivity. Mathematical equation to represent the relationship between temperatures and relative humidity on the production rate is modelled. From the equation model, the production rate for the workstation can be predicted base on the value of temperature and relative humidity.

Keywords: Productivity, comfort, relative humidity, WBGT

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2122


[1] Attwood, D.A., Deeb, J.M. & Danz-Reece M.E. 2004. Ergonomic solutions for the process industries. Elsevier.
[2] Hedge, A. Sims Jr, W.R. & Becker, F.D. 1990. Cornell University Study: Lighting the Computerized Office (12 Ogos 2007).
[3] IFC. 2003. Environmental and social guidelines for occupational and safety.
[4] Kahya, E. 2007. The effect of job characteristics and working conditions on job performance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 37: 515-523.
[5] Kim, S.Y. & Kim, J.J. 2006. Influence of light fluctuation on occupant visual perception. Journal of Building and Environment. 42: 2888-2899.
[6] Lee, S.Y & Brand, J.L. 2005. Effect of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 25: 323-333.
[7] Parsons, K.C. 2000. Environmental ergonomics: a review of principles, methods and models. Journal of Applied Ergonomic. 31: 581-594. Philips Lighting, The Netherlands.
[8] Van Bommel, W.J.M., Beld, G.J. & Ooyen, M.H.F. 2002. Industrial lighting and productivity. August 2002.
[9] Zeheeruddin & Garima. 2006. A neuro-fuzzy approach for prediction of human work efficiency in noisy environment. Journal of Applied Soft Computing. 6: 283-294.