Monte Carlo Analysis and Fuzzy Sets for Uncertainty Propagation in SIS Performance Assessment

Authors: Fares Innal, Yves Dutuit, Mourad Chebila

Abstract:

The object of this work is the probabilistic performance evaluation of safety instrumented systems (SIS), i.e. the average probability of dangerous failure on demand (PFD_avg) and the average frequency of failure (PFH), taking into account the uncertainties related to the different parameters that come into play: failure rate (λ), common cause failure proportion (β), diagnostic coverage (DC)... This leads to an accurate and safe assessment of the safety integrity level (SIL) inherent to the safety function performed by such systems. This aim is in keeping with the requirement of the IEC 61508 standard with respect to handling uncertainty. To do this, we propose an approach that combines (1) Monte Carlo simulation and (2) fuzzy sets. Indeed, the first method is appropriate where representative statistical data are available (using pdf of the relating parameters), while the latter applies in the case characterized by vague and subjective information (using membership function). The proposed approach is fully supported with a suitable computer code.

Keywords: Fuzzy sets, Monte Carlo simulation, Safety instrumented system, Safety integrity level.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1088822

References:

[1] IEC 61508 standard, Functional safety of electrical/electronic /programmable electronic safety-related systems. Parts 1 to 7, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
[2] Y. Dutuit, F. Innal, A. Rauzy, and J-P. Signoret, “Probabilistic assessments in relationship with safety integrity levels by using fault trees,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 93, pp. 1867– 1876, 2008.
[3] F. Innal, “Contribution to modelling safety instrumented systems and to assessing their performance-Critical analysis of IEC 61508 standard,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bordeaux, France, 2008.
[4] M. Sallak, “Evaluation de paramètres de sûreté de fonctionnement en présence d’incertitudes et aide à la conception: Application aux Systèmes Instrumentés de Sécurité,” Ph.D. dissertation, Nancy Université, Institut Nationnal Polytechnique de Lorraine, France, 2007.
[5] M. Sallak, C. Simon, and J.-F. Aubry, “A fuzzy probabilistic approach for determining safety integrity level,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16 (1), pp. 239–248, 2008.
[6] U. Hauptmanns, “The impact of reliability data on probabilistic safety calculations,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 21 (1), pp. 38–49, Jan. 2008.
[7] NASA, Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners. NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance,Washington, 2002.
[8] T. Aven. Foundations of Risk Analysis - A Knowledge and Decisionoriented Perspective. Chichester: Wiley, 2003.
[9] IEC 61508 standard, Functional safety of electrical/electronic/ programmable electronic safety-related systems. Parts 1 to 7, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998- 2000.
[10] J. L Rouvroye, “Enhanced Markov Analysis as a method to assess safety in the process industry,” Ph.D. dissertation, Technische Universiteit, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2001.
[11] W. Mechri, “Evaluation de la performance des Systèmes Instrumentés de Sécurité à paramètres imprécis,” Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Tunis El Manar, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Tunis, Tunisia, 2011.
[12] L. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and control, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965.
[13] K. B Misra, and G. G Weber, “A new method for fuzzy fault tree analysis” Microelectronics and Reliability, vol. 29(2), pp. 195–216, 1989.
[14] M. A. Lundteigen, “Safety instrumented systems in the oil and gas industry,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Trondheim, Norway, 2009.
[15] T. Bedford, and R. Cooke, Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
[16] C. E Kim, Y. J Ju, and M. Gens, “Multilevel fault tree analysis using fuzzy numbers” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 23(7), pp. 695– 703, 1996.
[17] D. Dubois, L. Foulloy, G. Mauris, and H. Prade, “Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities,” Reliable computing, vol. 10, pp. 273–297, 2004.