Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30579
Motion Control of a Ball Throwing Robot with a Flexible Robotic Arm

Authors: Yizhi Gai, Yukinori Kobayashi, Yohei Hoshino, Takanori Emaru


Motion control of flexible arms is more difficult than that of rigid arms, however utilizing its dynamics enables improved performance such as a fast motion in short operation time. This paper investigates a ball throwing robot with one rigid link and one flexible link. This robot throws a ball at a set speed with a proper control torque. A mathematical model of this ball throwing robot is derived through Hamilton’s principle. Several patterns of torque input are designed and tested through the proposed simulation models. The parameters of each torque input pattern is optimized and determined by chaos embedded vector evaluated particle swarm optimization (CEVEPSO). Then, the residual vibration of the manipulator after throwing is suppressed with input shaping technique. Finally, a real experiment is set up for the model checking.

Keywords: Motion Control, flexible robotic arm, CEVEPSO, ball throwing robot

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3154


[1] W. Mori, J. Ueda and T. Ogasawara, “A 1-dof dynamics pitching robot that independently controls velocity, angular velocity and direction of a ball”, Advanced Robotics, pp. 921-942, 2012.
[2] Y. Hoshino and Y. Kobayashi, “Shock and vibration control of a golf-swing robot at impacting the ball”, Journal of System Design and Dynamics, vol. 2, no. 5.
[3] R. C. Eberhart and Y. Shi, Computing Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2007.
[4] Y. Gai, Y. Kobayashi, R. Yamakawa, Y. Hoshino and T. Emaru, “Motion control of a flexible robotic arm by utilizing its dynamics”, Asia-Pacific Vibration Conference, vol. 4, pp.1971-1979, 2011.
[5] M. I. Solihin, W. Akmeliawati and R. Akmeliawati, “PSO-based optimization of state feedback tracking controller for a flexible link manipulator”,International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition, pp. 72-76, 2009.
[6] A. Shayeghi, H. Shayeghi and H. E. Kalasar, “Application of PSO technique for seismic control of tall building”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, pp. 851-858, 2009.
[7] Nadia Nedjah, Leandro dos Santos Coelho and Luiza de Macedo de Mourelle, Multi-Objective Swarm Intelligent Systems. Springer, 2009.
[8] K. E. Parsopoulos and M. N. Vrahatis, Particle Swarm Optimization and Intelligence: Advances and Applications. Information Science Reference, 2009.
[9] J. G. Vlachogiannis and K. Y. Lee, “Multi-objective based on parallel vector evaluated particle swarm optimization for optimal steady-state performance of power systems”, Expert Systems with Applications, pp. 10802-10808, 2009.
[10] S. N. Omkar, D. Mudigere, G. N. Naik and S. Gopalakrishnan, “Vector evaluated particle swarm optimization (VEPSO) for multi-objective design optimization of composite structures”, Computers and Structures, pp. 1-14, 2008.
[11] H. Jiang, C. K. Kwong, Z. Chen and Y. C. Ysim, “Chaos particle swarm optimization and T-S fuzzy modeling approaches to constrained predictive control”, Expert Systems with Applications, pp. 194-201, 2012.
[12] B. Alatas, E. Akin and A. B. Ozer, “Chaos embedded particle swarm optimization algorithms”, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, pp. 1715-1734, 2009.
[13] W.Singhose and W. Seering, Command Generation for Dynamics Systems. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2011, pp. 33-54.