Parametric Study of a Vapor Compression Refrigeration Cycle Using a Two-Phase Constant Area Ejector
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Parametric Study of a Vapor Compression Refrigeration Cycle Using a Two-Phase Constant Area Ejector

Authors: E. Elgendy

Abstract:

There are several ways of improving the performance of a vapor compression refrigeration cycle. Use of an ejector as expansion device is one of the alternative ways. The present paper aims at evaluate the performance improvement of a vapor compression refrigeration cycle under a wide range of operating conditions. A numerical model is developed and a parametric study of important parameters such as condensation (30-50°C) and evaporation temperatures (-20-5°C), nozzle and diffuser efficiencies (0.75-0.95), subcooling and superheating degrees (0-15K) are investigated. The model verification gives a good agreement with the literature data. The simulation results revealed that condensation temperature has the highest effect (129%) on the performance improvement ratio while superheating has the lowest one (6.2%). Among ejector efficiencies, the diffuser efficiency has a significant effect on the COP of ejector expansion refrigeration cycle. The COP improvement percentage decreases from 10.9% to 4.6% as subcooling degrees increases by 15K.

Keywords: Numerical modeling, R134a, Two phase ejector, Vapor compression refrigeration system.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1086537

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 5742

References:


[1] C. Aprea, R. Mastrullo, C. Renno, “Fuzzy control of the compressor speed in a refrigeration plant,” International Journal of Refrigeration 2004, 27(6), pp. 639-648.
[2] J. Sarkar, “Ejector enhanced vapor compression refrigeration and heat pump systems - A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012, 16 (9), pp. 6647-6659.
[3] A.A Kornhauser, “The use of an ejector as a refrigerant expander,” In: Proceedings of the USN/IIR-Purdue refrigeration conference 1990, West Lafayette, IN, USA, pp. 10–9.
[4] N. Bilir, H.K Ersoy, “Performance improvement of the vapour compression refrigeration cycle by a two-phase constant area ejector,” International Journal of Energy Research 2009, 33(5),pp. 469–80.
[5] J. Sarkar, “Performance characteristics of natural refrigerants based ejector expansion refrigeration cycles,” Proceedings of the IMechE, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy 2009,223, pp. 543–50.
[6] J. Sarkar, “Geometric parameter optimization of ejector-expansion refrigeration cycle with natural refrigerants,” International Journal of Energy Research 2010,34(1), pp. 84–94.
[7] E. Nehdi, L. Kairouani, M. Bouzaina, “Performance analysis of the vapour compression cycle using ejector as an expander,” International Journal of Energy Research 2007, 31(4), 364–75.
[8] K.F Fong, C.K Lee, T.T Chow, “Improvement of solar-electric compression refrigeration system through ejector-assisted vapour compression chiller for space conditioning in subtropical climate,” Energy Buildings 2011,43, pp. 3383–90.
[9] D. Li, E.A Groll, “Transcritical CO2 refrigeration cycle with ejectorexpansion device,” International Journal of Refrigeration 2005, 28, pp. 766–773.
[10] J.Q Deng, P.X Jiang, T. Lu, W. Lu, “Particular characteristics of transcritical CO2 refrigeration cycle with an ejector,” Applied Thermal Engineering 2007, 27, pp. 381–388.
[11] S.A Klein. Engineering Equation Solver (EES). F-Chart Software 2013, Madison: Wisconsin.