Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33093
Stakeholder Background and Knowledge Regarding Green Home Rating in Malaysia
Authors: Muhammad Azzam Ismail, Fahanim Abdul Rashid, Deo Prasad
Abstract:
Green home rating has emerged as an important agenda to practice the principles of sustainability. In Malaysia, the establishment of the 'Green Building Index ' Residential New Construction- (GBI-RNC) has brought this agenda closer to the stakeholders of the local green building industry. GBI-RNC focuses on the evaluation of the environmental impacts posed by houses rather than assessing the Triple-Bottom-Line (TBL) of Sustainability which also include socio-economic factors. Therefore, as part of a wider study, a survey was conducted to gather the backgrounds of green building stakeholders in Malaysia and their responses to a number of exploratory questions regarding the setting up of a framework to rate green homes against the TBL. This paper reports the findings from Section A and B from this survey and discusses them accordingly with a conclusion that forms part of the basis for a new generation green home rating framework specifically for use in Malaysia.Keywords: Green home rating, Malaysia, stakeholder surveyanalysis
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1084600
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1595References:
[1] B. Gillham, The research interview. London: Continuum, 2000.
[2] S. Kvale, Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1996.
[3] J. Knodel, "The design and analysis of focus group studies," in Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art, D. L. Morgan, Ed., ed Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, Inc., 1993, pp. 35- 50.
[4] R. A. Krueger and M. A. Casey, Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 3 ed. Thousand Oaks, Califronia: Sage Publications Inc., 2000.
[5] D. L. Morgan, Focus groups as qualitative research vol. 16. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1988.
[6] D. L. Morgan and R. A. Krueger, "When to use focus groups and why," in Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art, D. L. Morgan, Ed., ed Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, Inc., 1993, pp. 3- 19.
[7] K. O'Brien, "Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups," in Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art, D. L. Morgan, Ed., ed Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, Inc., 1993, pp. 105-117.
[8] P. Salant and D. A. Dillman, How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1994.
[9] B. Wolff, et al., "Focus groups and surveys as complementary research methods: a case example," in Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art, D. L. Morgan, Ed., ed Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, Inc., 1993, pp. 118-136.
[10] J. M. Morse and L. Niehaus, Mixed method design: principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, Inc, 2009.
[11] E. Babbie, Survey research methods - 2nd ed, 2nd ed. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1998.
[12] P. Allen and K. Bennet, PASW statistics by SPSS: a practical guide, version 18.0. Melbourne: Cengage Learning, 2010.
[13] P. Allen and K. Bennet, SPSS for the health and behavioural sciences. Melbourne: Thomson, 2008.
[14] A. W. Kerr, et al., Doing statistics with SPSS. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2002.