Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30379
Developing a Research Framework for Investigating the Transparency of ePortfolios

Authors: Elizabeth Downs, Judith Repman, Kenneth Clark

Abstract:

This paper describes the evolution of strategies to evaluate ePortfolios in an online Master-s of Education (M.Ed.) degree in Instructional Technology. The ePortfolios are required as a culminating activity for students in the program. By using Web 2.0 tools to develop the ePortfolios, students are able to showcase their technical skills, integrate national standards, demonstrate their professional understandings, and reflect on their individual learning. Faculty have created assessment strategies to evaluate student achievement of these skills. To further develop ePortfolios as a tool promoting authentic learning, faculty are moving toward integrating transparency as part of the evaluation process.

Keywords: Transparency, web 2.0, e-learning evaluation, ePortfolios

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1084250

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1213

References:


[1] Bollinger, D.U. & Shepherd, C.E. (2010). Student perceptions of eportfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 295- 314.
[2] Chatham-Carpenter, A. (2010). Avoiding the pitfalls: Current practices and recommendations for ePortfolios in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38(4), 437-456.
[3] Dalsgaard, C & Paulsen, M.F. (2009). Transparency in cooperative online education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3). Available at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/671/1267.
[4] Houston, C. (20120). Digital natives, 21st century school libraries, and 21st century preparation programs: An information affirmation of Branch and deGroot. School Libraries Worldwide, 18(1), 138-143.
[5] Jones, E. (2010). A professional practice portfolio for quality learning. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 292-312.
[6] Lieberman, A., & Mace, D.P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1-2), 77- 88.
[7] Lorenzo,G., & Ittelson, J., G. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. ELI Paper 1: 2005, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Available at http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf.
[8] Lowenthal, P.R., & Thomas, D. (2010). Death to the digital dropbox: Rethinking student privacy and public performance. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 33 (3). Available at http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterl yMagazineVolum/DeathtotheDigitalDropboxRethin/213672.
[9] Pecheone, R.L., Pigg, M.J., Chung, R.R., & Souviney, R.J. (2005). Performance assessment and electronic portfolios: Their effect on teacher learning and education. Clearing House, 78(4), 164-176.
[10] Poellhuber, B. & Anderson, T. (2011). Distance students- readiness for social media and collaboration. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6). Available at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1018/1960.
[11] Tucker, P.D., Stronge, J.H., Gareis, C.R., & Beers, C.S. (2003). The efficacy of portfolios for teacher evaluation and professional development: Do they make a difference? Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(5), 572-602.