Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 31100
Effect of Crude Oil Particle Elasticity on the Separation Efficiency of a Hydrocyclone
Abstract:The separation efficiency of a hydrocyclone has extensively been considered on the rigid particle assumption. A collection of experimental studies have demonstrated their discrepancies from the modeling and simulation results. These discrepancies caused by the actual particle elasticity have generally led to a larger amount of energy consumption in the separation process. In this paper, the influence of particle elasticity on the separation efficiency of a hydrocyclone system was investigated through the Finite Element (FE) simulations using crude oil droplets as the elastic particles. A Reitema-s design hydrocyclone with a diameter of 8 mm was employed to investigate the separation mechanism of the crude oil droplets from water. The cut-size diameter eter of the crude oil was 10 - Ðçm in order to fit with the operating range of the adopted hydrocylone model. Typical parameters influencing the performance of hydrocyclone were varied with the feed pressure in the range of 0.3 - 0.6 MPa and feed concentration between 0.05 – 0.1 w%. In the simulation, the Finite Element scheme was applied to investigate the particle-flow interaction occurred in the crude oil system during the process. The interaction of a single oil droplet at the size of 10 - Ðçm to the flow field was observed. The feed concentration fell in the dilute flow regime so the particle-particle interaction was ignored in the study. The results exhibited the higher power requirement for the separation of the elastic particulate system when compared with the rigid particulate system.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1083691Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1550
 A.J. Lynch, and T. C. Rao, and K. A. Prisbrey, International Journal of Mineral Process, Vol. 1, pp. 173-181, 1974.
 A. J. Lynch, T. C. Rao, and C. W. Bailey, International Journal of Mineral Process, Vol. 2, pp. 29-37, 1975.
 M. S. Klima, and B. H. Kim, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Vol. A33, pp. 1325-1340, 1988.
 C. A. C. Moraes, C. M. Hackenburg, C. Russo, and R. A. Medronho, Hydrocyclones, London & Bury Saint Edmunds: Mechanical Engineering Publication, pp. 339-421, 1996.
 S. Marti, F. M. Erdal, O. Shoham, S. Shirazi, and Kouba, G.E., Hydrocyclones, London & Bury Saint Edmunds: Mechanical Engineering Publication, pp. 339-421, 1996.
 E. Ortega-Rivas, Eng. Life Sci., Vol. 4, pp. 119-123, 2004.
 P. Seccombe, J. Chem. Tech. Biotech., Vol. 51, pp. 284-285, 1991.
 H. Yuan, D. Rickwood, I. C. Smyth, and M. T. Thew, Bioseparation, Vol. 6, pp. 159-163, 1996.
 J. J. Cilliers, S. T. L. Harrison, Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol 65, pp. 21-26, 1997.
 J. J. Cilliers, L. Diaz-Anadon, and F. S. Wee, Minerals Engineering, Vol. 17, pp. 591-597, 2004.
 G. Q. Dai, J. M. Li, and W. M. Chen, Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 74, pp. 217-223, 1999.
 A. F. Nowakowski, J. C. Cullivan, R. A. Williams, and T. Dyakowsi, Minerals Engineering, Vol. 17, pp. 785-790, 2004.
 M. Narasimha, R. Sripriya, and P. K. Banerjee, International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol. 75, pp. 53-68, 2005.
 R. A. Medronho, J. Schuetze, and W. Deckwer, Lat. Am. App. Res., Vol. 35, pp. 1-8, 2005.
 L. Svarovsky, Hydrocyclones, Holt: Reinehart and Winston Ltd., 1984.
 K. Rietema, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 15, pp. 298-325, 1965.
 M. A. Z. Coelho, and R. A. Medronho, Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 84, pp. 7-14, 2001.
 J. Gough, I. H. Gregory, and A. H. Muhr, Finite Element Analysis of Elastomers, Professional Engineering Publishing, 1999.
 F. D. Lloyd-Lucas, Finite Element Analysis of Elastomers, Professional Engineering Publishing, 1999.
 M. H. B. M. Shariff, and I. D. Stalker, Finite Element Analysis of Elastomers, Professional Engineering Publishing, 1999.
 H. T. Williams, S. Jamil, and V. A. Coveney, Finite Element Analysis of Elastomers, Professional Engineering Publishing, 1999.