Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 31097
Comparing Data Analysis, Communication and Information Technologies Expertise Levels in Undergraduate Psychology Students
Authors: Ana Cázares
Abstract:Aims for this study: first, to compare the expertise level in data analysis, communication and information technologies in undergraduate psychology students. Second, to verify the factor structure of E-ETICA (Escala de Experticia en Tecnologias de la Informacion, la Comunicacion y el Análisis or Data Analysis, Communication and Information'Expertise Scale) which had shown an excellent internal consistency (α= 0.92) as well as a simple factor structure. Three factors, Complex, Basic Information and Communications Technologies and E-Searching and Download Abilities, explains 63% of variance. In the present study, 260 students (119 juniors and 141 seniors) were asked to respond to ETICA (16 items Likert scale of five points 1: null domain to 5: total domain). The results show that both junior and senior students report having very similar expertise level; however, E-ETICA presents a different factor structure for juniors and four factors explained also 63% of variance: Information E-Searching, Download and Process; Data analysis; Organization; and Communication technologies.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1083391Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1006
 ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS-S) and Performance Indicators for Students, ISTE, 2007.
 L. Markauskaite, "Exploring the structure of trainee teachers- ICT literacy: the main components of, and relationships between, general cognitive and technical capabilities" Educational Technology, Resaerch and development, 55, pp. 547-572, 2007.
 JD. G. Oblinger & J.L. Oblinger, (2009, February 10). Educating the Net Generation Available: http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/5989.
 OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, "Are students ready for a technology-rich world? Briefing Notes for Japan", is available from the OECD-s Online Bookshop (www.oecd.org).
 A. C├ízares, "Proficiency and attitudes toward Data Analysis and Information Technologies' use in Psychology Undergraduate", Computers in Human Behavior, submitted for publication.
 L. J. Cronbach & P. E. Meehl, "Construct validity in psychological test", Offprinted from the Psychological Bulletin, vol. 52, No. 4, July, 1955.
 J.G. Benitez., Los modelos causales como metodolog├¡a para la validez de constructo, Barcelona, Espa├▒a: Alamex, S.A., 1986, pp. 25-27.
 C.C. Kuhlthau, "Information skills for an information society: A review of research". ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources, Syracuse, New York, December 1987.
 T. M. Vitolo and Ch. Coulston, "Taxonomy of information literacy competencies", Journal of Information Technology Education, vol 1, no. 1, pp. 43 -50, 2002.
 T. F. N. Laird and G. D. Kuh, "Students experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement", Research in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 211-233, March 2005.
 B.S. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), M.D. Engelhart,, Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & rathwohl, D.R. (1956). "Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals". Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay, 1956.
 Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of selfefficacy. Retrieved December 20, 2008. Available: http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html.
 Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71-81). New York, NY: Academic Press.