Critical Assessment of Scoring Schemes for Protein-Protein Docking Predictions

Authors: Dhananjay C. Joshi, Jung-Hsin Lin

Abstract:

Protein-protein interactions (PPI) play a crucial role in many biological processes such as cell signalling, transcription, translation, replication, signal transduction, and drug targeting, etc. Structural information about protein-protein interaction is essential for understanding the molecular mechanisms of these processes. Structures of protein-protein complexes are still difficult to obtain by biophysical methods such as NMR and X-ray crystallography, and therefore protein-protein docking computation is considered an important approach for understanding protein-protein interactions. However, reliable prediction of the protein-protein complexes is still under way. In the past decades, several grid-based docking algorithms based on the Katchalski-Katzir scoring scheme were developed, e.g., FTDock, ZDOCK, HADDOCK, RosettaDock, HEX, etc. However, the success rate of protein-protein docking prediction is still far from ideal. In this work, we first propose a more practical measure for evaluating the success of protein-protein docking predictions,the rate of first success (RFS), which is similar to the concept of mean first passage time (MFPT). Accordingly, we have assessed the ZDOCK bound and unbound benchmarks 2.0 and 3.0. We also createda new benchmark set for protein-protein docking predictions, in which the complexes have experimentally determined binding affinity data. We performed free energy calculation based on the solution of non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation (nlPBE) to improve the binding mode prediction. We used the well-studied thebarnase-barstarsystem to validate the parameters for free energy calculations. Besides,thenlPBE-based free energy calculations were conducted for the badly predicted cases by ZDOCK and ZRANK. We found that direct molecular mechanics energetics cannot be used to discriminate the native binding pose from the decoys.Our results indicate that nlPBE-based calculations appeared to be one of the promising approaches for improving the success rate of binding pose predictions.

Keywords: protein-protein docking, protein-protein interaction, molecular mechanics energetics, Poisson-Boltzmann calculations

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1083331

References:

[1] E. Katchalski-Katzir, I. Shariv, M. Eisenstein, A.A. Friesem, C. Aflalo, I.A. Vakser, Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89 (1992) 2195-2199.
[2] B. Honig, A. Ray, C. Levinthal, Conformational flexibility and protein folding: rigid structural fragments connected by flexible joints in subtilisin BPN, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73 (1976) 1974-1978.
[3] C. Barillari, J. Taylor, R. Viner, J.W. Essex, Classification of water molecules in protein binding sites, Journal of the American Chemical Society 129 (2007) 2577-2587.
[4] J.M.J. Swanson, S.A. Adcock, J.A. McCammon, Optimized radii for Poisson-Boltzmann calculations with the AMBER force field, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 1 (2005) 484-493.
[5] J.M.J. Swanson, J.A. Wagoner, N.A. Baker, J.A. McCammon, Optimizing the Poisson dielectric boundary with explicit solvent forces and energies: Lessons learned with atom-centered dielectric functions, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 3 (2007) 170-183.
[6] R.W. Harrison, I.V. Kourinov, L.C. Andrews, The Fourier-Green's function and the rapid evaluation of molecular potentials, Protein Eng 7 (1994) 359-369.
[7] H.A. Gabb, R.M. Jackson, M.J.E. Sternberg, Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information, Journal of Molecular Biology 272 (1997) 106-120.
[8] G. Moont, H.A. Gabb, M.J.E. Sternberg, Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes, Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 35 (1999) 364-373.
[9] R.M. Jackson, H.A. Gabb, M.J.E. Sternberg, Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: Application to the docking problem, Journal of Molecular Biology 276 (1998) 265-285.
[10] C. Dominguez, R. Boelens, A.M. Bonvin, HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information, Journal of the American Chemical Society 125 (2003) 1731-1737.
[11] S.J. de Vries, A.D. van Dijk, M. Krzeminski, M. van Dijk, A. Thureau, V. Hsu, T. Wassenaar, A.M. Bonvin, HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: new features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets, Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 69 (2007) 726-733.
[12] A.D. van Dijk, A.M. Bonvin, Solvated docking: introducing water into the modelling of biomolecular complexes, Bioinformatics 22 (2006) 2340-2347.
[13] J. Fernandez-Recio, M. Totrov, R. Abagyan, ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains, Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 52 (2003) 113-117.
[14] J.J. Gray, S. Moughon, C. Wang, O. Schueler-Furman, B. Kuhlman, C.A. Rohl, D. Baker, Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations, Journal of Molecular Biology 331 (2003) 281-299.
[15] S. Chaudhury, A. Sircar, A. Sivasubramanian, M. Berrondo, J.J. Gray, Incorporating biochemical information and backbone flexibility in RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 6-12, Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 69 (2007) 793-800.
[16] S. Chaudhury, J.J. Gray, Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles, Journal of Molecular Biology 381 (2008) 1068-1087.
[17] D.W. Ritchie, G.J.L. Kemp, Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces, Journal of Computational Chemistry 20 (1999) 383-395.
[18] D.W. Ritchie, G.J.L. Kemp, Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations, Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 39 (2000) 178-194.
[19] D.W. Ritchie, G. Macindoe, L. Mavridis, V. Venkatraman, M.D. Devignes, HexServer: an FFT-based protein docking server powered by graphics processors, Nucleic Acids Research 38 (2010) W445-W449.
[20] D.W. Ritchie, V. Venkatraman, Ultra-fast FFT protein docking on graphics processors, Bioinformatics 26 (2010) 2398-2405.
[21] R. Chen, Z.P. Weng, Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics, Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 47 (2002) 281-294.
[22] R. Chen, L. Li, Z.P. Weng, ZDOCK: An initial-stage protein-docking algorithm, Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 52 (2003) 80-87.
[23] B. Pierce, Z. Weng, ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function, Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 67 (2007) 1078-1086.
[24] Z.P. Weng, J. Mintseris, B. Pierce, K. Wiehe, R. Anderson, R. Chen, Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction, Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 69 (2007) 511-520.
[25] Z.P. Weng, B. Pierce, A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance, Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 72 (2008) 270-279.
[26] H.M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T.N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I.N. Shindyalov, P.E. Bourne, The Protein Data Bank, Nucleic Acids Research 28 (2000) 235-242.
[27] M.D. Daily, D. Masica, A. Sivasubramanian, S. Somarouthu, J.J. Gray, CAPRI rounds 3-5 reveal promising successes and future challenges for RosettaDock, Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 60 (2005) 181-186.
[28] J.J. Gray, S.E. Moughon, T. Kortemme, O. Schueler-Furman, K.M. Misura, A.V. Morozov, D. Baker, Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment, Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 52 (2003) 118-122.
[29] H. Hwang, T. Vreven, B.G. Pierce, J.H. Hung, Z. Weng, Performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in CAPRI rounds 13-19, Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 78 (2010) 3104-3110.
[30] A.M.J.J. Bonvin, P.L. Kastritis, Are Scoring Functions in Protein-Protein Docking Ready To Predict Interactomes? Clues from a Novel Binding Affinity Benchmark, Journal of Proteome Research 9 (2010) 2216-2225.
[31] J. Janin, P.L. Kastritis, I.H. Moal, H. Hwang, Z.P. Weng, P.A. Bates, A.M.J.J. Bonvin, A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity, Protein Science 20 (2011) 482-491.
[32] J. Mintseris, K. Wiehe, B. Pierce, R. Anderson, R. Chen, J. Janin, Z. Weng, Protein-Protein Docking Benchmark 2.0: an update, Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 60 (2005) 214-216.
[33] H. Hwang, B. Pierce, J. Mintseris, J. Janin, Z. Weng, Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0, Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 73 (2008) 705-709.
[34] R. Wang, Y. Lu, X. Fang, S. Wang, An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44 (2004) 2114-2125.
[35] D.A. Case, T.E. Cheatham, 3rd, T. Darden, H. Gohlke, R. Luo, K.M. Merz, Jr., A. Onufriev, C. Simmerling, B. Wang, R.J. Woods, The Amber biomolecular simulation programs, Journal of Computational Chemistry 26 (2005) 1668-1688.
[36] N.A. Baker, D. Sept, S. Joseph, M.J. Holst, J.A. McCammon, Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98 (2001) 10037-10041.
[37] A.M. Buckle, G. Schreiber, A.R. Fersht, Protein-protein recognition: crystal structural analysis of a barnase-barstar complex at 2.0-A resolution, Biochemistry 33 (1994) 8878-8889.
[38] R.D. Gorham, C.A. Kieslich, D. Morikis, Electrostatic Clustering and Free Energy Calculations Provide a Foundation for Protein Design and Optimization, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 39 (2011) 1252-1263.