Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30848
Sensitivity Computations of Time Relaxation Model with an Application in Cavity Computation

Authors: Monika Neda, Elena Nikonova


We present a numerical study of the sensitivity of the so called time relaxation family of models of fluid motion with respect to the time relaxation parameter χ on the two dimensional cavity problem. The goal of the study is to compute and compare the sensitivity of the model using finite difference method (FFD) and sensitivity equation method (SEM).

Keywords: Sensitivity, deconvolution, time relaxation, Navier- Stokes equations

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1004


[1] F. Pahlevani, Sensitivity Computations of Eddy Viscosity Models with an Application in Drag Computation, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids., 52-4:381-392, 2006.
[2] M. Anitescu and W. J. Layton, Sensitivities in Large Eddy Simulation and Improved Estimates of Turbulent Flow Functionals J.C.P, 178: 391-426, 2001.
[3] M. Anitescu and W. J. Layton, Uncertainties in large eddy simulation and improved of turbulent flow functionals, 2002.
[4] M. Anitescu, F. Pahlevani and W. J. Layton, Implicit for local effects and explicit for nonlocal effects is unconditionally stable Electronic Trnasactions of Numerical Analysis, 18: 174-187, 2004.
[5] J. Borggaard and J. Burns, A sensitivity equation approach to shape optimization in fluid flows Flow control, 49-78, 1995.
[6] J. Borggaard, D. Pelletier and E. Turgeon, A continuous sensitivity equation method for flows with temperature, SIAM, 14-24, 1993.
[7] J. Borggaard, D. Pelletier and E. Turgeon, A continuous sensitivity equation method for flows with temperature dependent properties, in Proceedings of the 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplanary Analysis and Design, 2481 1993.
[8] J. Borggaard, D. Pelletier and E. Turgeon, Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for variable property flows, in Proceedings of the 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 0140, 1993.
[9] J. Borggaard and J. Burns, A PDE sensitivity equation method for optimal aerodynamic design, Journal of Computational Physics, 136:366-384, 1997.
[10] J. Borggaard and A. Verma, Solutions to continuous sensitivity equations using Automatic Differentiation, SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, 22:39-62, 2001.
[11] A. Godfrey and E. Cliff, Direct calculation of aerodynamic force derivatives: A sensitivity equation approach, in proceedings of the 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 0393, 1998.
[12] J. Guermond, Stabilization of Galerkin approximations of transport equations by subgrid modeling, M2AN, 33: 1293-1316, 1999.
[13] M. Gunzburger, Sensitivities, adjoints and flow optimization, Int. Jour. Num. Meth. Fluids, 31:53-78, 1999.
[14] P. Sagaut and T.Lˆe, Some investigations of the sensitivity of large eddy simulation, Tech. Rep., 1997-12, ONERA.
[15] A. Dunca and Y. Epshteyn, On the Stolz-Adams deconvolution LES model, SIAM J. Math Analysis, 2006
[16] L. Stanley and D. Stewart, Design sensitivity analysis: Computational issues of sensitivity equation methods, Frontiers in Mathematics, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2002.
[17] N. A. Adams and S. Stolz, Deconvolution methods for subgrid-scale approximation in large eddy simulation Modern Simulation Strategies for Turbulent Flow, 2001.
[18] N. A. Adams and S. Stolz, A subgrid-scale deconvolution approach for shock capturing J.C.P, 178: 391-426, 2001.
[19] R. Guenanff, Non-stationary coupling of Navier-Stokes/Euler for the generation and radiation of aerodynamic noises, PhD thesis, Universite Rennes, Rennes, France, 2004.
[20] F. Hecht, O. Pironneau and K. Oshtsuka, Software Freefem++,, 2003.
[21] V. J. Ervin, W. J. Layton and Monika Neda, Numerical Analysis of a Higher Order Time Relaxation Model of Fluids, International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling, 4(3-4): 648-670.