Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
A Matrix Evaluation Model for Sustainability Assessment of Manufacturing Technologies

Authors: Q. Z. Yang, B. H. Chua, B. Song

Abstract:

Technology assessment is a vital part of decision process in manufacturing, particularly for decisions on selection of new sustainable manufacturing processes. To assess these processes, a matrix approach is introduced and sustainability assessment models are developed. Case studies show that the matrix-based approach provides a flexible and practical way for sustainability evaluation of new manufacturing technologies such as those used in surface coating. The technology assessment of coating processes reveals that compared with powder coating, the sol-gel coating can deliver better technical, economical and environmental sustainability with respect to the selected sustainability evaluation criteria for a decorative coating application of car wheels.

Keywords: Evaluation matrix, sustainable manufacturing, surface coating, technology assessment

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1080920

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2256

References:


[1] G. Bechmann, M. Decker, U. Fiedeler, B-J Krings, "Technology assessment in a complex worl", International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol3, No 1, 2007, pp2-27.
[2] J. P. Martino, Technological forecasting for decision making, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
[3] P. Wildman and J. Warner, Problem-solving and decision-making tool kit, Amherst, MA: HRD Press, 2003.
[4] N. Cross, Engineering design methods: strategies for product design, West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 1994.
[5] Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, International Organization for Standardization, 14040:2006.
[6] A. Boussabaine and R. Kirkham, Whole Life-cycle Costing: Risk and Risk Responses, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
[7] R. E. H. M. Smith, "State of the art technology assessment in Europe", in Proc. 2nd European congress on technology assessment, Milan, 1990.
[8] J. van den Ende, K. Mulder, M. Knot, E. Moors, P. Vergragt, "Traditional and modern technology assessment: Toward a toolkit", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 58, no. 1-2, pp. 5- 21, 1998.
[9] T. J. Foxon, P. Pearson, Z. Makuch, M. Mata, "Policy Drivers and Barriers for Sustainable Innovation". Available: http://www.sustainabletechnologies.ac.uk/PDF/106_Monograph.pdf.
[10] J. Pope, D. Annandale, A. Morrison-Saunders, "Conceptualising sustainability assessment", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 24, pp. 595-616, 2004.
[11] B. Roy, Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
[12] Y. Akao, Quality function deployment. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press, 1990.
[13] A. Rip, T. Misa, J. Schot (editors). The approach of constructive technology assessment, London: Pinter Publisher, 1995.
[14] J. Schot and A. Rip, "The past and future of constructive technology assessment", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2/3), 1997, pp. 251-268.
[15] J. Pope, J, "Facing the gorgon: sustainability assessment and policy learning in Western Australia", PhD dissertation, Murdoch University, 2007. Available: http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/pubfiles/adt- MU20070330. 154243/02Whole