**Commenced**in January 2007

**Frequency:**Monthly

**Edition:**International

**Paper Count:**31105

##### Measuring Teachers- Beliefs about Mathematics: A Fuzzy Set Approach

**Authors:**
M.A. Lazim,
M.T.Abu Osman

**Abstract:**

**Keywords:**
Conjoint analysis,
belief,
membership function,
degree of similarity

**Digital Object Identifier (DOI):**
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1080736

**References:**

[1] Curriculum Development Centre, Ministry of Education, Malaysia. Integrated Curriculum for Secondary School, KualaLumpur: Government Publication, 2001.

[2] P. Cobb. Contexts, goals, beliefs and learning mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2-9, 1986

[3] M.F. Pajeras, Teachers- beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 62, pp. 307-332, 1992.

[4] P. Ernest, The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics, in Bloomfield, A. and Harries, T. (Eds). Teaching and Learning in Mathematics, Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics. 1994.

[5] A.G. Thompson. The relationship of teachers- conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol.15, pp. 105-127, 1984.

[6] S. Lerman. Alternative perspectives of the nature of mathematics and their influence on the teaching mathematics, British Educational Research Journal, 16, 53-61. 1990

[7] A.G. Thompson. Teachers- beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research: In A.D Grouws (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, NY: Macmillan. 1992.

[8] B. Shealy. Conceptualizing the development of two first-year secondary mathematics teachers- beliefs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, 1994.

[9] L.A. Zadeh . Fuzzy Set, Information and Control, Vol. 8, pp. 338 - 353, 1965.

[10] L.A. Zadeh. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Part 1 and 2, Information Sciences, Vol. 8, pp. 199- 249, pp. 301- 357, 1975

[11] H.J. Zimmerman. Fuzzy Sets Theory and its applications (2nd revised ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academics Publishers, 1991.

[12] C.C. Ragin. Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago: Chicago Univ Press, 2000.

[13] K. Asai,. Fuzzy Systems for Management. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1995.

[14] G.Bojadziev and ,M. Bojadziev. Fuzzy Logic for Business, Finance and Management. Singapore; World Scientific, 1997.

[15] S. Weon, and J. Kim. Learning achievement evaluation strategy using fuzzy membership function, 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno: NV, 2001.

[16] P.E. Green, and V. Srinivasan. Conjoint analysis in market research: New developments and directions, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, pp. 3- 19, 1990.

[17] I.B.Turksen, and I.A. Willson.. A fuzzy set preference model for consumer choice. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 68, pp. 253- 353, 1994.

[18] G. Carter, and K. S. Norwood, The relationship between teacher and student beliefs about mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, Vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 62-67, 1997.

[19] D.R. Wittink and P Cattin, Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, pp. 91-96, 1989.

[20] R. Borasi, The invisible hand operating in mathematics instruction: Students- Conceptions and Expectations. Teaching and Learning Mathematics in the 1990s. Reston, VA: NCTM, 1990.

[21] C.S. Lim. A study on Malaysian Mathematician-s way of knowing. Report on Short Term Research Grant, Penang: Universiti Sains Malaysia Press, 2002.

[22] C.S. Lim. Public Images of Mathematics. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Exeter, UK, 1999.

[23] A.G. Thompson. Teachers- beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research, in A.D Grouws (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, NY: Macmillan, 1992.

[24] S. Perdikaris,. Mathematizing the Van Hiele levels: a fuzzy set approach, International Journal of Mathematics Education and Science Technology, Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41-47, 1996.

[25] C.S. Crowther, W.H. Batchelder, and X. Hu, Measurement -theoretic analysis of fuzzy logic model of perception, Psychological Review, Vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 396-408, 1995.

[26] M. A. Lazim, Construction of conceptual knowledge of quadratic functions in QFtica: A fuzzy approach and multiple representations. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University College of Science and Technology, Malaysia, 2004.

[27] M.A. Lazim, W.A. Salihin, and M.T. Abu Osman, Fuzzy sets in the social sciences: An overview of related research, Jurnal Teknologi, Vol.41, no.E, pp.43-54, 2004.